Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )__)

 Filed by the Registrant Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12

Caterpillar Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Thanother than the Registrant)

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX)Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)5) Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)1) Amount previously paid:
(2)2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)3) Filing Party:
(4)4) Date Filed:





Table of Contents




Table of Contents

Caterpillar’s reputation is one of our greatest assets. We all share the responsibility to protect it – every day. We have earned our solid reputation by developing, building and delivering great products and services, and by acting according to the highest ethical standards.

Integrity
The Power of Honesty

Integrity is the foundation of all we do. It is a constant. Those with whom we work, live and serve can rely on us.

Excellence
The Power of Quality

The power of quality. We set and achieve ambitious goals. The quality of our products and services reflects the power and heritage of Caterpillar.

Teamwork
The Power of Working Together

We help each other succeed. We are a team, sharing our unique talents to help those with whom we work, live and serve.

Commitment
The Power of Responsibility

We embrace our responsibilities. Individually and collectively we make meaningful commitments — first to each other, and then to those with whom we work, live and serve.

Sustainability
The Power of Endurance

We are committed to building a better world. Sustainability is part of who we are and what we do every single day.




Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We are sending you these proxy materials in connection with Caterpillar’s solicitation of proxies, on behalf of its Board of Directors, for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Annual Meeting). Distribution of these materials is scheduled to begin on May 2, 2017.1, 2020. Please submit your vote andor proxy by telephone, mobile device, Internet,internet, or, if you received your materials by mail, you can also complete and return your proxy or voting instruction form by mail.

LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

5

PROXY SUMMARY

26

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

26

Shareholder Voting Matters

26

Our Director Nominees

37

Governance Highlights

48

20162019 Performance Highlights

48

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

59

DIRECTORS & GOVERNANCE

10

PROPOSAL 1

6

Proposal 1 - Election of Directors

610

Overview of Ourour Board

610

Board Attendance - 2019

610

Board Evolution Since 20112015

711

Diversity of Skills and Expertise

11

Director Continuous Education and Development

712

Global ExperienceBoard’s Role in Risk Oversight

12

Director Nominations and Evaluations

712

Director Candidate Biographies and Qualifications

814

Director Compensation

1218

Board Election and Leadership Structure

1319

Duties and Responsibilities of ChairmanPresiding Director

1320

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct

1320

Board Evaluation Process

1420

Board Committees

1420

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight15
Director Nominations and Evaluations16

Director Independence Determinations

1722

Communication Withwith the Board

1722

Investor Outreach

1822

Awards and Recognitions18
Sustainability19

Political Contributions and Lobbying

1923

Related Party Transactions

23

AUDIT

2024

PROPOSAL 2

AUDIT

21
Proposal 2 - Ratification of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

2124

Audit Fees and Approval Process

2124

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee Information

2125

Anonymous Reporting of Accounting and Other Concerns

2225

Audit Committee Report

25

COMPENSATION

2227

PROPOSAL 3

COMPENSATION

23
Proposal 3 - Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

2327

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

2428

Executive Summary

2428

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

2832

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

41
20162019 Summary Compensation Table

4142

20162019 All Other Compensation Table

4243

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20162019

4344

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20162019 Fiscal Year End

4445

20162019 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

4547

20162019 Pension Benefits

4647

20162019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

4748

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

48
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

49

CEO Pay Ratio

50
Compensation Risk50
Proposal 4 - Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Executive Compensation Votes

51

Proposal 5 - Approve the Amended and Restated 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan

51
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

52

PROPOSAL 4

60

Proposal 6 - Shareholder Proposal – Provide a Report of Lobbying Activities

52

PROPOSAL 5

60

Proposal 7 - Shareholder Proposal – Decrease Percent of Ownership Required to Call Special Shareholder MeetingIndependent Board Chairman

54

PROPOSAL 6

62

Proposal 8 - Shareholder Proposal – Provide a Report of Lobbying PrioritiesShareholder Action by Written Consent

6356

Proposal 9 - Shareholder Proposal – Include Sustainability as a Performance Metric under Executive Incentive Plans

65
Proposal 10 - Shareholder Proposal – Amend the Company’s Compensation Clawback Policy67
Proposal 11 - Shareholder Proposal – Adopt a Permanent Policy that the Chairman be Independent69
OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION

58

Matters Raised at the Annual Meeting Not Included in this Statement

7158

Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 2021 Annual Meeting

58

Persons Owning More Than Five Percent of Caterpillar Common Stock

7158

Security Ownership of Executive Officers and Directors

7259

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports

7259

Matters Raised at the Annual Meeting Not Included in This Statement73
Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 2018 Annual Meeting73

Access to Form 10-K

60

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

7360

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Meeting Attendance and Voting

7461

Admission and Ticket Request Procedure77
EXHIBIT A - AMENDED AND RESTATED CATERPILLAR INC. 2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN78



2020 PROXY STATEMENT    3



Back to Contents

DEARTable of ContentsFELLOW SHAREHOLDERS,

D. JAMES UMPLEBY III

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

“AS WE CONTINUE TO EXECUTE ON David L. Calhoun
Chairman of the Board

DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS,


I am honored to serve your interests as Caterpillar’s recently elected non-executive chairman of the board of directors. Your board has played a very active role in recent months. Following a thorough and deliberative succession planning process, the board elected Jim Umpleby as Caterpillar’s chief executive officer effective January 1, 2017. Jim has more than 35 years of experience at Caterpillar, most recently as group president of the Energy & Transportation business segment and a member of the executive office.

Doug Oberhelman, our chairman and CEO since 2010, has retired and we want to acknowledge his enormous contributions to our company over his 41-year career. Doug led our management team through the most severe business cycle in our history. The team took extraordinary steps to optimize our manufacturing and distribution footprint, lower overhead costs, and invest in competitively differentiated technologies. Over this very challenging period we improved our competitive position, protected our financial position, and developed a very capable leadership team for the future.

A leadership transition is an appropriate time to take a fresh look at our company’s strategy. Jim has brought a diverse management team together to review our strategy and will report recommendations later this year. Caterpillar remains the worldwide market leader in an array of businesses with great prospects. We have a global dealer network that is the envy of our competitors. As our customers seek greater productivity than ever before, they require technology solutions to, among other things, make them more efficient, and increase safety, equipment utilization and performance. Caterpillar is committed to meeting those needs, and more, for all of our customers. Your board will be closely involved in this strategy review process to help ensure our choices create maximum long term value for shareholders.

Caterpillar is also committed to good governance and compliance with all regulations and laws, and we have a very robust system in place to support and monitor our performance on this commitment, which is reviewed by the board on an annual basis and by the audit committee at its regularly scheduled meetings. Employee compliance matters are brought to our attention through the Caterpillar Office of Business Practices and audit staff reviews. Caterpillar’s code of conduct, known as Our Values in Action, is applied consistently across our global enterprise, acknowledged annually by all employees and benchmarked against the best in industry. Board members must also read, understand, and acknowledge our commitment to these Values every year. We regularly benchmark our corporate governance, compensation, compliance and other practices against peers and preferences of organizations such as The Council of Institutional Investors, of which we are a member.

On March 2, 2017, federal law enforcement authorities executed search warrants at three of our Peoria-area facilities. The warrants, while also related to export filings, were connected in part to a matter we previously disclosed relating to our Switzerland-based subsidiary, CSARL. We take this matter very seriously, we are cooperating with the government investigation, and we have a strong team in place to manage this matter. Caterpillar has retained former U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr and Jim has asked him to review matters related to the search warrants, take a fresh look at Caterpillar’s disputes with the government, get all the facts, and then help bring these matters to an appropriate resolution.



OUR STRATEGY FOR LONG-TERM
PROFITABLE
GROWTH, WE ALSO
FOCUS
ON WINNING THE RIGHT
WAY,
FOR OUR CUSTOMERS, OUR
EMPLOYEES AND OUR
COMMUNITIES AROUND THE
WORLD.”


TableDear Fellow Shareholders,

On behalf of Contents

As partthe Board of Directors and our leadership transition,entire company, I cordially invite you to attend the board separated the rolesAnnual Meeting of chairman and chief executive officer.Shareholders on June 10, 2020, at 8 a.m. Central Time. This structure allows our new CEOmeeting will be entirely virtual in order to focus on running the business while, as non-executive chairman, I ensure the board is providing Jim the resources and counsel to make our company successful. We believe a strong and independent board is integraladhere to the long term successrecommendations of our company. Our movepublic health officials during the COVID-19 pandemic. The virtual format will give more shareholders the opportunity to splitparticipate in the chairmeeting, while ensuring everyone’s health and CEO role at this moment in time demonstrates that commitment. The board intends to review the appropriateness of this structure on a biannual basis.safety.

We regularly review the composition and qualifications of our board, and are delighted that Ray Wilkins, a former executive of AT&T Inc., joined our board in April 2017. Ray brings a broad array of leadership and business skills, including communications and information technology expertise that will serve the emerging needs of our company and augment the Board’s knowledge in these areas.

Shareholder relationships and outreach are a critical part of the board’s oversight. In addition to regular investor relations engagement, we meet annually with manyreceiving an update on the performance of the company, you will have the opportunity to vote on several items related to our institutional shareholders.business. Please refer to page 61 for information on how to participate in this year’s shareholder meeting.

The board of directors is honored to represent Caterpillar and our shareholders. We encourage you to review this proxy statement to learn more about your Board of Directors, our governance practices, compensation programs and philosophy, and other important items. Your vote is important. Please vote your shares ateither by virtually attending the upcoming annual meeting.meeting, by voting online separately, via your mobile phone, by telephone or by mail. Thank you for your ongoing investment in, and support of, Caterpillar as we continue to execute our enterprise strategy for long-term profitable growth and shareholder value.

Sincerely,

Very truly yours,


David L. CalhounD.JamesUmplebyIII
Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer


2020 PROXY STATEMENT    5



Back to Contents

PROXYTable of ContentsSUMMARY

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider.consider when casting your vote. You should read the complete proxy statement before voting.

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


Time

TIME & Date:DATE

PLACE

RECORD DATE

ADMISSION

8:00 a.m. - Central Time

June 14, 2017

Place:10, 2020

250 Dozer Drive, Athens, Georgia 30606-0701
Record Date:

Virtual Meeting

www.meetingcenter.io/268805716

Password: CAT2020

The close of business

on April 17, 2017

Admission:13, 2020

Please

To attend and register for the
Virtual Meeting, please follow the
instructions contained in the Admission Procedure on page 7761


SHAREHOLDER VOTING MATTERS

Proposal

Board’s Voting

Recommendation

Page

Reference

1

Election of 11 Directors Named in This Proxy Statement

FOR Each Nominee

10

2

Ratification of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

FOR

24

3

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

FOR

27

4

Shareholder Proposal – Provide a Report of Lobbying Activities

AGAINST

52

5

Shareholder Proposal – Independent Board Chairman

AGAINST

54

6

Shareholder Proposal – Shareholder Action by Written Consent

AGAINST

56


PROPOSALBOARD’S VOTING
RECOMMENDATION
    PAGE
REFERENCE
1   Election of thirteen Directors named in this Proxy StatementFOR each Nominee6
2Ratification of our Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFOR21
3Advisory Vote to approve Executive CompensationFOR23
4Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Executive Compensation VotesOne Year51
5Approve the Amended and Restated Caterpillar Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive PlanFOR51
6Shareholder Proposal – Provide a Report of Lobbying ActivitiesAGAINST60
7Shareholder Proposal – Decrease Percent of Ownership Required to Call Special Shareholder MeetingAGAINST62
8Shareholder Proposal – Provide a Report of Lobbying PrioritiesAGAINST63
9Shareholder Proposal – Include Sustainability as a Performance Measure under Executive Incentive PlansAGAINST65
10Shareholder Proposal – Amend the Company’s Compensation Clawback PolicyAGAINST67
11Shareholder Proposal – Adopt a Permanent Policy that the Chairman be IndependentAGAINST69

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    6


Back to Contents

OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Nominee and Principal Occupation

Independent

Age

Director
Since

Other Public Company Boards

Caterpillar

Committees

AC

CHRC

PPGC

Kelly A. Ayotte

Former U.S. Senator representing
New Hampshire

Yes

51

2017

The Blackstone Group Inc.

Boston Properties, Inc.

News Corporation

 

 

David L. Calhoun

Presiding Director of Caterpillar Inc.

President and CEO

of The Boeing Company

Yes

62

2011

The Boeing Company

 

 

 

 

Daniel M. Dickinson

Managing Partner of HCI Equity Partners

Yes

58

2006

None

 

 

Juan Gallardo

Chairman and Former CEO of Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V.

Yes

72

1998

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico, S.A.B. de C.V.

Grupo Financiero Santander Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V.

Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V.

 

 

William A. Osborn

Former Chairman and CEO of Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company

Yes

72

2000

Abbott Laboratories
General Dynamics Corporation

 

 

Debra L. Reed-Klages

Former Chairman and CEO of Sempra Energy

Yes

63

2015

Chevron Corporation

Lockheed Martin

 

 

Edward B. Rust, Jr.

Former Chairman and CEO of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Yes

69

2003

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

S&P Global Inc.

 

 

Susan C. Schwab

Professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy and Strategic
Advisor for Mayer Brown LLP;
former United States Trade Representative

Yes

65

2009

The Boeing Company

FedEx Corporation

Marriott International, Inc.

 

 

 

D. James Umpleby III

Chairman and CEO of Caterpillar Inc.

No

62

2017

Chevron Corporation

 

 

 

Miles D. White

Executive Chairman of the Board, Abbott Laboratories

Yes

65

2011

Abbott Laboratories

McDonald’s Corporation

 

 

Rayford Wilkins, Jr.

Former CEO of Diversified Businesses
at AT&T Inc.

Yes

68

2017

Morgan Stanley
Valero Energy Corporation

 

 

2AC: |

2017 Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

DIRECTORCAT COMMITTEES
NOMINEE AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION

INDEPENDENT

AGE

SINCE

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS

AC

CC

PPGC

David L. Calhoun Independent Chairman
Senior Managing Director of The Blackstone Group, L.P.

Yes

59

2011

Nielsen Holdings PLC
The Boeing Company

Daniel M. Dickinson
Managing Partner of HCI Equity Partners

Yes

55

2006

None

Juan Gallardo
Former CEO of Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V.

Yes

69

1998

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico,
S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Financiero Santander Mexico,
S.A.B. de C.V.
Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V.

Jesse J. Greene, Jr.
Instructor at Columbia Business School and former Vice President of Financial Management and Chief Financial Risk Officer of International Business Machines Corporation

Yes

72

2011

None

Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.
Former United States Ambassador to China and former Governor of Utah

Yes

57

2012

Chevron Corporation
Ford Motor Company
Hilton Worldwide HoldingsInc.

Dennis A. Muilenburg
Chairman, President and CEO of The Boeing Company

Yes

53

2011

The Boeing Company

William A. Osborn
Former Chairman and CEO of Northern Trust Corporation

Yes

69

2000

Abbott Laboratories
General Dynamics Corporation

Debra L. Reed
Chairman and CEO of Sempra Energy

Yes

60

2015

Halliburton Company
Sempra Energy

Edward B. Rust, Jr.
Former Chairman and CEO of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Yes

66

2003

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
S&P Global Inc.

Susan C. Schwab
Professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy and a Strategic Advisor for Mayer Brown LLP; former United States Trade Representative

Yes

62

2009

FedEx Corporation
Marriott International, Inc.
The Boeing Company

Jim Umpleby
CEO of Caterpillar Inc.

No

59

2017

None
Miles D. White
Chairman and CEO of Abbott Laboratories

Yes

62

2011

Abbott Laboratories
McDonald’s Corporation

Rayford Wilkins, Jr.
Former CEO of Diversified Businesses at AT&T

Yes

65

2017

Morgan Stanley
Valero Energy Corporation


AC: Audit Committee       CC:CHRC: Compensation and Human Resources Committee       PPGC: Public Policy and Governance Committee


  Chair
  Member


Chair

2017 Proxy Statement  |3

Member


2020 PROXY STATEMENT    7



Back to Contents

Table of ContentsGOVERNANCEHIGHLIGHTS

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Our commitment to good corporate governance stems from our belief that a strong governance framework creates long-term value for our shareholders, strengthens Board and management accountability and builds trust in the Company and its brand. Our governance framework includes, but is not limited to, the following highlights:

BOARD AND GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

Board and Governance Information

Board and Governance Information

BOARD AND GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

Size of Board

11

13Average Director Tenure7 years
Number of Independent Directors12Supermajority Voting Threshold for MergersNo
Average Age of Directors62Proxy AccessYes
Board Meetings Held in 20169Shareholder Action by Written ConsentNo
Annual Election of DirectorsYesShareholder Called Special MeetingsYes
Mandatory Retirement Age72Poison PillNo
Women and Minority Board Members38%

Code of Conduct for Directors, Officers and Employees

Yes

Majority

Number of Independent Directors

10

Supermajority Voting inThreshold for Mergers

No

Average Age of Directors

64

Proxy Access

Yes

Average Director ElectionsTenure (in years)

11

Yes

Shareholder Action by Written Consent

No

Annual Election of Directors

Yes

Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings

Yes

Mandatory Retirement Age

74

Poison Pill

No

Gender and Diversity

45%

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers

Yes

Separate Chair and CEO

Majority Voting in Director Elections

Yes

Yes

Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policies

Yes

Independent ChairYesCompensation Recoupment PolicyYes

2016 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

DIVIDEND PAYMENTSCOST REDUCTIONSTRONG BALANCE SHEET

$1.8 billion

Our dividend has remained a high priority throughout this difficult economic cycle andin 2016 we paid $1.8 billion in dividends to shareholders.

Caterpillar has paid a cash dividend every year since the Company was formed and has paid a quarterly dividend since 1933.Independent Presiding Director

Yes

~$2.3 billionClawback Policy

Period costs and variable manufacturing costs were $2.3 billion lower in 2016 – restructuring and cost reduction actions and lower incentive pay helped mitigate the impact of lower sales.


$7.2 billion

Despite significant restructuring costs, we ended 2016 with$7.168billion of cash on the balance sheet and Machinery, Energy & Transportation (ME&T) debt-to-capital ratio at41%.Yes


4 |

2017 Proxy Statement




Table of Contents2019 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN

PROFIT PER SHARE

STRONG BALANCE SHEET

15.4%

$10.74

$6.2 billion

Delivered operating margin of 15.4% in line with 2019 Investor Day Targets on 2% lower sales and revenues.

Profit per share was $10.74 in 2019, up from $10.26 in 2018. Adjusted profit per share* was $11.06 in 2019, compared with $11.22 in 2018.

Returned $6.2 billion to Shareholders in line with 2019 Investor Day Targets. The Company repurchased $4.0 billion of common shares and paid $2.1 billion in dividends, while ending 2019 with a cash balance of $8.3 billion.

*

Adjusted Profit Per Share is a non-GAAP measure and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is included on page 60.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    8


Back to Contents

510 Lake Cook Road, Suite 100

100 NE Adams Street
Peoria, Illinois 61629Deerfield, IL 60015
Phone (309) 675-1000(224) 551-4160
www.caterpillar.com

NOTICENOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS

In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board of Directors, after careful consideration, has decided to hold this year’s Annual Meeting exclusively online. If you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, please see the information below as well as the attendance and registration instructions on page 61. There will be no physical location for the Annual Meeting this year.

MEETING INFORMATION

JUNE 10, 2020

8:00 a.m. Central Time

Website: www.meetingcenter.io/268805716

Password: CAT2020

MEETINGAGENDA

Date:June 14, 2017
Time:8:00 a.m.
Place:250 Dozer Drive
Athens, GA 30606-0701
Record Date:April 17, 2017
1.

Elect11 director nominees named in this Proxy Statement

2.

Ratifyour independent registered public accounting firm for 2020

3.

Approve, by non-binding vote, executive compensation

4.

Voteon shareholder proposals

5.

Addressanyotherbusiness that properly comes before the meeting

RECORD DATE

April 13, 2020

By Order of the Board of Directors

Suzette M. Long

Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
May 1, 2020

MEETING AGENDA:

Electthirteen director nominees named in this Proxy Statement
Ratifyour independent registered public accounting firm for 2017
Approve, by non-binding vote, executive compensation
Approve, by non-binding vote, the frequency of executive compensation votes
Voteto approve the Amended and Restated 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Voteon shareholder proposals
Anyother business that properly comes before the meeting

PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARESSHARES:


We encourage shareholders to vote promptly, as this will save the expense of additional proxy solicitation.

You may vote in the following ways:

By InternetBy Mobile Device By TelephoneBy Mail

BY INTERNET


BY MOBILE DEVICE

BY TELEPHONE

BY MAIL

vote online at
www.caterpillar.com/
proxymaterials


scan this QR code
to vote with
your
mobile device


call the number
included on
your
proxy card or notice


mail your signed
proxy or voting
instruction form



By Order of the Board of Directors


Christopher M. Reitz
Corporate Secretary
May 2, 2017

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Shareholder meeting to be held on June 10, 2020.

This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the 20162019 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.eproxyaccess.com/cat2017.www.investorvote/CAT.



2017 Proxy Statement

 |5

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    9



Back to Contents


Table of ContentsDIRECTORS& GOVERNANCE

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT

What am I voting on?

Shareholders are being asked to elect thirteenthe 11 director nominees named in this Proxy Statement for a one-year term.

Board Voting Recommendation:

FORthe election of each of the Board’s director nominees.

OVERVIEWOFOURBOARD

BOARDATTENDANCE-2019OVERVIEW OF OUR BOARD

   

Board

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

 

99%

Audit

10

 

 

10

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

Compensation &
Human Resources

6

 

3

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

6

3

 

Attendance for
incumbent directors for
2019

 

Public Policy &
Governance

6

6

4

 

6

 

 

6

6

 

 

 

 

*

The Board of Directors approved certain committee membership changes effective April 12, 2019. As part of those changes, Mr. Calhoun left the Compensation & Human Resources Committee (CHRC) and joined the Public Policy & Governance Committee (PPGC) and Mr. Wilkins left the Audit Committee and joined the CHRC. Messrs. Calhoun and Wilkins attended all of their former and newly assigned committee meetings held during 2019.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    10

GENDER AND
DIVERSITY
DIRECTOR
AGE
DIRECTOR
TENURE

Back to ContentsBOARD ATTENDANCE

 
Board9999989997998
Audit11 11   11 11    
Compensation &
Human Resources
77  7    7  7
Public Policy &
Governance
5  5 5    55 




98%
Attendance for 2016



The Board’s policy is to encourage and expect that all directors should attend the annual shareholder meeting.each Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All directors attended the 2016 shareholder meeting.2019 Annual Meeting. The independent directors generally meet in executive session as part of each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Ed Rust, who was Caterpillar’sThe Board’s independent Presiding Director, in 2016,David L. Calhoun, presided over the Board’s executive sessions in 2016.2019.

6 |

2017 Proxy Statement



TableBOARDEVOLUTIONSINCE2015

Three new directors elected

Rotation of ContentsBoard committee chairs

Presiding Director elected

Expanded qualifications and diversity represented on Board

DIVERSITYOFSKILLSANDEXPERTISE

BOARD EVOLUTION SINCE 2011

Eight new directors elected

Full rotation of Board committee chairs

Independent Chairman elected

Reallocation of committee responsibilities

Expanded qualifications and diversity represented on Board

DIVERSITY OF SKILLS AND EXPERTISE

Our independent Board nominees offer a diverse range of skills and experience in relevant areas.

SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR SKILLS, CORE COMPETENCIES AND ATTRIBUTES

   
              

Caterpillar Board
Tenure (Years)

3

9

14

22

20

5

17

11

3

9

3

11 years
Average Tenure

Board of Directors Experience (other Boards)

100%

Audit Committee Financial Expert

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100% of
Audit Committee Members

CEO / Leadership

100%

Business Development and Strategy

 

91%

Government / Regulatory Affairs

 

 

82%

Customer and Product Support Services

 

 

82%

Finance & Accounting

 

 

82%

Risk Management

 

91%

Technology

 

 

 

73%

Global Experience

 

91%

Manufacturing / Logistics

 

 

 

 

 

 

45%

Gender and Diversity

 

 

 

 

 

 

45%

Age

51

62

58

72

72

63

69

65

62

65

68

64 years
Average Age

GLOBAL EXPERIENCE 2020 PROXY STATEMENT    11


As shown by the yellow highlighted areas in the map below, our independent directors have international experience that aligns with Caterpillar’s global presence.Back to Contents


2017 Proxy Statement

 |7




Table of ContentsDIRECTORCONTINUOUSEDUCATIONANDDEVELOPMENT

The Board has nominatedCompany places a high importance on the following individuals to stand for election for a one-year term expiring at the annual meetingcontinuous development of shareholders in 2018.

The number of persons comprising the Caterpillar Board of Directors is currently established as thirteen. If any of the Board’s nominees should become unavailable to serve as a Director prior to the Annual Meeting, the size of the Board and number of Board nominees will be reduced accordingly.

DIRECTOR CANDIDATE BIOGRAPHIES AND QUALIFICATIONS

its Board. Directors have beenopportunities for ongoing education and development through participation in meetings, subscriptions to relevant publications and attendance at activities and professional development training offered by associations such as the National Association of Corporate Directors and Lead Director Network. Directors receive specialized presentations from experts in the Company’s various businesses in the course of their current positions forservice. Since the past five years unless otherwise noted. Information is aslast annual shareholder meeting, these presentations have included updates on digital strategy, customer support, the operations of April 1, 2017.

 

DAVID L. CALHOUN

Senior Managing Director and Head of Private Equity Portfolio Operations of The Blackstone Group L.P. (private equity firm)

Other current directorships (2)Age59
Nielsen Holdings PLC
The Boeing Company
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2011
Medtronic, Inc
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent Chairman of the Board
Compensation

Key Qualifications and Skills:

Mr. Calhoun was previously Executive Chair of Nielsen Holdings N.V. (marketing and media information) (2014-2015). Prior to his position at Blackstone, Mr. Calhoun served as Chairman of the Executive Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Nielsen Company B.V. (2006-2013).

The Board believes that Mr. Calhoun provides valuable insight and perspective into general strategic and business matters, stemming from his extensive executive and management experience with Blackstone, Nielsen and GE. Mr. Calhoun also has significant manufacturing and high-technology industry expertise as evidenced by his leadership of GE’s aircraft engines and transportation businesses.


 

DANIEL M. DICKINSON

Managing Partner of HCI Equity Partners (private equity firm)

Other current directorships (0)Age55
None
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2006
Mistras Group, Inc.
Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd.
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Audit

Key Qualifications and Skills:

The Board believes that Mr. Dickinson’s experience in mergers and acquisitions, private equity business and role as an investment banker provides important insights for evaluating investment opportunities. His significant financial experience, both in the U.S. and internationally, contributes to the Board’s understanding and ability to analyze complex issues. His experience as a former director of large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


 

JUAN GALLARDO

Former CEO of Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V. (beverage industry)

Other current directorships (3)Age69
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Financiero Santander Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V.
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since1998
Lafarge SA
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Public Policy and Governance

Key Qualifications and Skills:

Mr. Gallardo retired as the CEO of Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V. in 2016. Mr. Gallardo resides in Mexico where Caterpillar has a presence. The Board believes that Mr. Gallardo’s international business experience, particularly in Latin America and South America, is important for the Company’s understanding of these markets. His extensive background in trade-related issues also contributes to the Board’s expertise. In addition, his experience as a chief executive officer and director of large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


8 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Tablecertain Energy and Transportation businesses, cybersecurity, lean manufacturing, connected assets and the Cat® dealer network. These opportunities allow directors to be well informed and to expand their knowledge of Contents

 

JESSE J. GREENE, JR.

Instructor at Columbia Business School

Other current directorships (0)Age72
None
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2011
None
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Compensation

Key Qualifications and Skills:

Mr. Greene is currently an instructor at Columbia Business School in New York City where he teaches corporate governance, risk management and other business topics at the graduate and executive education levels. He was formerly Vice President of Financial Management and Chief Financial Risk Officer of International Business Machines Corporation (computer and office equipment).

The Board believes that Mr. Greene’s risk management and information technology experience provides a unique skill set to the Board. His experience as a chief financial risk officer and executive of a large, publicly-traded multinational corporation enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


 

JON M. HUNTSMAN, JR.

Former United States Ambassador to China (2009- 2011) and former Governor of Utah (2005-2009)

Other current directorships (3)Age57
Chevron Corporation
Ford Motor Company
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2012
Huntsman Corporation
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Public Policy and Governance

Key Qualifications and Skills:

Caterpillar has a significant manufacturing presence and dealer network in China. The Board believes that Mr. Huntsman’s extensive knowledge of Asia and international affairs, operational experience gained as governor of Utah and experience as a director of other large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


 

DENNIS A. MUILENBURG

Chairman, President and CEO of The Boeing Company (aircraft and defense)

Other current directorships (1)Age53
The Boeing Company
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2011
None
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Audit

Key Qualifications and Skills:

Prior to his current position, Mr. Muilenburg was Vice Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer of The Boeing Company (2013-2015). Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President of The Boeing Company and President and Chief Executive Officer of Boeing Defense, Space & Security (2009-2013).

The Board believes that Mr. Muilenburg provides valuable insight to the Board on strategic and business matters, stemming from his experience with large-scale product development programs and his worldwide supply chain and manufacturing expertise.


2017 Proxy Statement

 |9




Table of Contents

 

WILLIAM A. OSBORN

Former Chairman and CEO of Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company (financial services)

Other current directorships (2)Age69
Abbott Laboratories
General Dynamics Corporation
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2000
Tribune Company
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Audit, Chair

Key Qualifications and Skills:

The Board believes that Mr. Osborn’s financial expertise and experience is valuable to the Board. In addition, his experience as a chief executive officer and director of other large, publicly-traded corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


 

DEBRA L. REED

Chairman of the Board and CEO of Sempra Energy (energy infrastructure and utilities)

Other current directorships (2)Age60
Halliburton Company
Sempra Energy
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2015
None
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Compensation

Key Qualifications and Skills:

The power, oil and gas industries are key end-user markets for Caterpillar products. The Board believes that Ms. Reed’s background provides valuable insights into trends in these industries. In addition, her experience as a chief executive officer and director of other large, publicly-traded corporations enables her to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


 

EDWARD B. RUST, JR.

Former Chairman and CEO of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (insurance)

Other current directorships (2)Age66
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
S&P Global Inc.
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2003
None
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Public Policy and Governance, Chair

Key Qualifications and Skills:

Mr. Rust retired as Chairman in 2017 and as Chief Executive Officer in 2016 of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

The Board believes that Mr. Rust’s financial and business experience is valuable to the Board. His role as a past Chairman of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, chief executive officer of a major national corporation and experience as a director of large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company. In addition, his extensive involvement in education improvement compliments the Company’s culture of social responsibility.


10 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

 

SUSAN C. SCHWAB

Professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy and a Strategic Advisor for Mayer Brown LLP (global law firm)

Other current directorships (3)Age62
FedEx Corporation
Marriott International, Inc.
The Boeing Company
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2009
None
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Public Policy and Governance

Key Qualifications and Skills:

Prior to her current positions, Ambassador Schwab held various positions including United States Trade Representative (member of the President’s cabinet) and Deputy United States Trade Representative.

The Board believes that Ambassador Schwab brings extensive knowledge, insight and experience on international trade issues to the Board. Her educational experience and role as the U.S. Trade Representative provide important insights for the Company’s global business model and long-standing support of open trade. In addition, her experience as a director of large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables her to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


 

JIM UMPLEBY

CEO of Caterpillar Inc.

Other current directorships (0)Age59
None
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector SinceJanuary 2017
None
Caterpillar CommitteeManagement
None

Key Qualifications and Skills:

Prior to his current position, Mr. Umpleby served as a Group President of Caterpillar Inc. 2013 to 2016) and before that served as a Vice President of Caterpillar Inc. (2010 to 2013).

The Board believes that Mr. Umpleby’s extensive experience and knowledge of the Company, gained in a wide range of Caterpillar leadership positions in engineering, manufacturing, marketing, sales and services enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


 

MILES D. WHITE

Chairman and CEO of Abbott Laboratories (pharmaceuticals and biotechnology)

Other current directorships (2)Age62
Abbott Laboratories
McDonald’s Corporation
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector Since2011
None
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Compensation, Chair

Key Qualifications and Skills:

The Board believes that Mr. White’s experience as the chief executive officer of a large, complex multinational company provides important insight to the Board. His skills include knowledge of cross-border operations, strategy and business development, risk assessment, finance, leadership development and succession planning, and corporate governance matters. In addition to his role as an executive officer, his experience as a director of other large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company.


2017 Proxy Statement

 |11




Table of Contents

 

RAYFORD WILKINS, JR.

Former Chief Executive Officer of Diversified Businesses at AT&T (telecommunications)

Other current directorships (2)Age65
Morgan Stanley
Valero Energy Corporation
Other directorships within the last five yearsDirector SinceApril 2017
América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.
Caterpillar CommitteeIndependent
Audit

Key Qualifications and Skills:

The Board believes that Mr. Wilkins’ expertise and oversight experience in the information technology area is valuable to the Board. In addition, his experience as an executive officer and director of other large, publicly-traded corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board and the Company. Mr. Wilkins was brought to the attention of the Board through a professional search firm.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Compensation for non-employee directors for 2016 was comprised of the following components:

Cash Retainer:$150,000
Restricted Stock Units (1 year vesting)$125,000
Stipends:
              Presiding Director$25,000
              Audit Committee Chairman$20,000
              Compensation Committee Chairman$20,000

trends and issues relevant to their role. Directors are required to own Caterpillar common stock equal to five times their annual cash retainer. Directors have a five-year period from the date of their electionalso given development and education opportunities through speaking or appointment to meet the target ownership guidelines.

Directors may defer 50 percent or more of their annual cash retainer and stipend into an interest-bearing account or an account representing phantom shares of Caterpillar stock.

Directors that joined the Board prior to 2008 also participate in a Charitable Award Program, under which a donation of up to $500,000 will be made by the Company, in the director’s name, to charitable organizations selected by the director and $500,000 to the Caterpillar Foundation. Directors derive no financial benefit from the program.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2016
DIRECTORFEES EARNED OR
PAID IN CASH
RESTRICTED
STOCK UNITS
1
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION2
TOTAL
David L. Calhoun$150,000$125,015       $       $275,015
Daniel M. Dickinson     $150,000     $125,015     $32,696     $307,711
Juan Gallardo$150,000$125,015$13,051$288,066
Jesse J. Greene, Jr.$150,000$125,015$2,000$277,015
Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.$150,000$125,015$$275,015
Dennis A. Muilenburg$150,000$125,015$$275,015
William A. Osborn$170,000$125,015$13,051$308,066
Debra L. Reed$150,000$125,015$2,100$277,115
Edward B. Rust, Jr.$175,000$125,015$22,833$322,848
Susan C. Schwab$150,000$125,015$15,000$290,015
Miles D. White$170,000$125,015$8,000$303,015

1 As of December 30, 2016, the number of vested and non-vested options (NQs), RSUs and Phantom Shares held by each individual serving as a non-employee director during 2016 was: Mr. Calhoun: 12,197 (which consists of 1,672 RSUs and 10,525 Phantom Shares); Mr. Dickinson: 26,101 (which consists of 1,672 RSUs and 24,429 Phantom Shares); Mr. Gallardo: 34,400 (which consists of 5,833 SARs, 1,672 RSUs and 26,895 Phantom Shares); Mr. Greene: 1,672 RSUs; Mr. Huntsman: 1,672 RSUs; Mr. Muilenburg: 1,672 RSUs; Mr. Osborn: 2,036 (which consists of 1,672

12 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

RSUs and 364 Phantom Shares); Ms. Reed: 4,897 (which consists of 1,672 RSUs and 3,225 Phantom Shares); Mr. Rust: 34,083 (which consists of 1,672 RSUs and 32,411 Phantom Shares); Ms. Schwab: 11,091 (which consists of 1,672 RSUs and 9,419 Phantom Shares); and Mr. White: 7,802 (which consists of 1,672 RSUs and 6,130 Phantom Shares). Mr. Calhoun, Mr. Dickinson, Mr. Gallardo, Ms. Reed, Mr. Rust, Ms. Schwab and Mr. White deferred 100 percent of their 2016 retainer fee into phantom stock in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.

2 All Other Compensation represents amounts paid in connectionmeeting directly with the Caterpillar Foundation’s Directors’ Charitable Award Program and the Caterpillar Political Action Committee Charitable Matching Program (CATPAC’s PACMATCH program) and administrative fees associated with the Directors’ Charitable Award Program. All outside directors are eligible to participate in the Caterpillar Foundation Matching Gift Program and eligible directors may participate in the CATPAC’s PACMATCH program annually. The Caterpillar Foundation will match contributions to eligible two year or four year colleges or universities, arts and cultural institutions and public policy or environmental organizations, up to a maximum of $2,000 per eligible organization per calendar year. As part of CATPAC’s PACMATCH program, Caterpillar Inc. will contribute to two charities on behalf of eligible members of the Board of Directors. The annual CATPAC’s PACMATCH contribution limit is $5,000 so the match, per person, would not exceed $5,000. The amounts listed represent the matching contributions as follows: Mr. Dickinson $2,250, Mr. Greene $2,000, Ms. Reed $2,100, Mr. Rust $13,500, Ms. Schwab $15,000management and Mr. White $8,000. For directors eligibleother employees, Company dealers and customers to participate in the Directors’ Charitable Award Program, the amounts represented include the insurance premium and administrative fees. The premium and administrative fees are as follows: Mr. Dickinson $30,446, Mr. Gallardo $13,051, Mr. Osborn $13,051 and Mr. Rust $9,333.

BOARD ELECTION AND LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Directors are elected at each annual meeting to serve for a one-year term. In uncontested elections, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast for such director. If an incumbent director does not receive a greater number of “for” votes than “against” votes, then such director must tender his or her resignation to the Board. In contested elections, directors are elected by a plurality vote. Directors must retire at the end of the calendar year in which they reach the age of 72.

On January 1, 2017, Jim Umpleby, formerly Group President with responsibility for Energy & Transportation, succeeded Douglas R. Oberhelman as Chief Executive Officer and was appointed as a member of our Board of Directors. In planning for the succession of Mr. Oberhelman, the Public Policy and Governance Committee (PPGC) and the Board carefully reviewed the Board’s leadership structure and determined that it would be appropriate to separate the roles of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and to appoint an independent Chairman. Accordingly, on April 1, 2017 David L. Calhoun became our independent Chairman.

The Board has no fixed policy on whether or not to have a non-executive chairman. The Board believes this determination should be made based onbetter understand the Company’s best interests in light of the circumstances at the timeoperations and experience. The PPGC and the Board believe that this leadership structure is the most appropriate one for the Company at this time, as it allows Mr. Umpleby to focus on the day-to-day management of the business and on executing our strategic priorities, while allowing Mr. Calhoun to focus on leading the Board, providing its advice and counsel to Mr. Umpleby, and facilitating the Board’s independent oversight of management.

The Board believes it is important to maintain flexibilityalso through attending industry trade shows such as to the Board’s leadership structure. The Board will continue to regularly review its leadership structure and exercise its discretion in recommending an appropriate and effective framework on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the needs of the Board and the Company at such time.CONEXPO.

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CHAIRMAN

Presides at all meetings of the Board.
Encourages and facilitates active participation of all directors.
Serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer.
Approves Board meeting materials for distribution.
Approves Board meeting schedules and agendas.
Has the authority to call meetings of the directors.
Leads the Board’s annual evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer.
Monitors and coordinates with management on corporate governance issues and developments.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES AND CODE OF CONDUCT

Our Board has adopted Guidelines on Corporate Governance Issues (Corporate Governance Guidelines), which are available on our website at www.caterpillar.com/governance. The guidelines reflect the Board’s commitment to oversee the effectiveness of policy and decision-making both at the Board and management level, with a view to enhancing shareholder

2017 Proxy Statement

 |13




Table of ContentsBOARD’SROLEINRISKOVERSIGHT

value over the long-term. Caterpillar’s code of conduct is called Our Values in Action. Integrity, Excellence, Teamwork, Commitment and Sustainability are the core values identified in the code and are the foundation for Caterpillar’s corporate existence. Our Values in Action apply to all members of theBoard and to management and employees worldwide. These values embody the high ethical standards that Caterpillar has upheld since its formation in 1925. Our Values in Action is available on our website at www.caterpillar.com/code.

BOARD EVALUATION PROCESS

The Board conducts an annual self-evaluation to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. In 2016, the Presiding Director contacted each Board member to solicit their feedback. The Public Policy & Governance Committee also developed a discussion outlinethat was circulated to the Board members in advance of their year-end meeting. The Presiding Director then led a discussion during the Board’s private session. Each of the committees of the Board followed a similar process.

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board has three standing committees: Audit; Compensation; and Public Policy and Governance. Each committee meets periodically throughout the year, reports its actions and recommendations to the Board, receives reports from management, annually evaluates its performance and has the authority to retain outside advisors at its discretion. The current primary responsibilities of each committee are summarized below and set forth in more detail ineach committee’s written charter, which can be found on Caterpillar’s website at www.caterpillar.com/governance. All committee members are independent under Company, NYSE and SEC standards applicable to Board and committee service, and the Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Committee Members:
Daniel M. Dickinson
Dennis A. Muilenburg
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.
William A. Osborn, Chair
(pictured below)

Number of Meetings
in 2016:
11

COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Selects and oversees the independent auditors
Involved in selecting the independent auditors’ lead audit partner
Oversees our financial reporting activities, including our financial statements, annual report and accounting standards and principles
Discusses with management the Company’s risk assessment and risk management framework
Approves audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors
Reviews the organization, scope and effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit function, disclosures and internal controls
Sets parameters for and monitors the Company’s hedging and derivatives practices
Provides oversight for the Company’s ethics and compliance programs
Monitors the Company’s litigation and tax compliance
Discusses information technology systems and related security

14 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Committee Members:
David L. Calhoun
Jesse J. Greene, Jr.
Debra L. Reed
Miles D. White, Chair
(pictured below)

Number of Meetings
in 2016:
7

COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Recommends the CEO’s compensation to the Board and establishes the compensation of other executive officers
Establishes, oversees and administers the Company’s equity compensation and employee benefit plans
Reviews incentive compensation arrangements to ensure that incentive pay does not encourage unnecessary risk-taking and reviews and discusses the relationship between risk management policies and practices, corporate strategy and executive compensation
Recommends to the Board the compensation of directors
Provides oversight of the Company’s diversity and immigration practices and employee relations
Furnishes an annual Compensation Committee Report on executive compensation and approves the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in the Company’s proxy statement

PUBLIC POLICY AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Committee Members:
Juan Gallardo
Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.
Edward B. Rust, Jr., Chair
(pictured below)
Susan C. Schwab

Number of Meetings
in 2016:
5


COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size and composition of the Board and its committees, and the criteria to be used for the selection of candidates to serve on the Board
Discusses and evaluates the qualifications of potential and incumbent directors and recommends the slate of director candidates to be nominated for election at the Annual Meeting
Leads the Board in its annual self-evaluation process
Oversees the Company’s officer succession planning
Oversees the Company’s environmental, health and safety activities and sustainability
Oversees the corporate governance structure
Oversees matters of domestic and international public policy affecting the Company’s business, such as trade policy and international trade negotiations and major global legislative and regulatory developments
Annually reviews the Company’s charitable and political contributions and policies
Oversees investor and community relations

BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board has oversight for risk management with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic, operational, financial and legal compliance risks. The Board’s risk oversight process builds upon management’s risk assessment and mitigation processes, which include an enterprise risk management program, regular internal management disclosure and compliance committee meetings, a code of business conduct that applies to all employees, executives and directors, quality standards and processes, an ethics and compliance officeandprogram and comprehensive internal audit processes. The Board’s risk oversight role also includes the selection and oversight of the independent auditors. The Board implements its risk oversight function both as a full Board and through delegation to Board committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board. The Board has delegated the oversight of specific risks to Board committees that align with their functional responsibilities.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |15




TableThe Audit Committee (AC) assists the Board in overseeing the enterprise risk management program and evaluates and monitors risks related to the Company’s financial reporting requirements, system of Contents

DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS AND EVALUATIONS

PROCESS FOR NOMINATING AND EVALUATING DIRECTORS

internal controls, the internal audit program, the independent auditor, the compliance program, and the information security program. The AC assesses cybersecurity and information technology risks and the controls implemented to monitor and mitigate these risks. The Chief Information Officer attends all bimonthly AC meetings and provides cybersecurity updates to the AC and Board. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (CHRC) monitors and assesses risks associated with the Company’s employment and compensation policies and practices. The Public Policy and Governance Committee (PPGC) oversees various governance matters and risks related to public policy and environmental, health and safety matters affecting the Company.

DIRECTORNOMINATIONSANDEVALUATIONS

PROCESS FOR NOMINATING AND EVALUATING DIRECTORS

The PPGC solicits and receives recommendations for potential director candidates from shareholders, management, directors and other sources. In its assessment of each potential candidate, the PPGC considers each candidate’s professional experience, integrity, honesty, judgment, independence, accountability, willingness to express independent thought, understanding of the Company’s business and other factors that the PPGC determines are pertinent in light of the current needs of the Board. Candidates must have successful leadership experience and stature in their primary fields, with a background that demonstrates an understanding of business affairs as well as the complexities of a large, publicly-held company. In addition, candidates must have a demonstrated an ability to think strategically and make decisions with a forward-looking focus and the ability to assimilate relevant information on a broad range of complex topics. In evaluating director candidates, the PPGC also considers key skills and experience related to the Company’s strategy for long-term profitable growth, which identifies services, expanded offerings and operational excellence as primary focus areas. Moreover, candidates must have the ability to devote the time necessary to meet a director’s responsibilities and serve on no more than four public company boards in addition to Caterpillar.

The Board values diversity of talents, skills, abilities and experiences and believes that Board diversity of all types enhances the Company’s Board.performance of the Board and provides significant benefits to the Company. Accordingly, the PPGC takes into account the diversity of the Board in selecting new director candidates.

DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT PROCESS 2020 PROXY STATEMENT    12


Back to Contents

DIRECTORRECRUITMENTPROCESS

CANDIDATE

RECOMMENDATIONS

Candidate
Recommendations

PPGC

PPGC

BOARDOFDIRECTORS

Board of DirectorsShareholders

SHAREHOLDERS

from Shareholders,
Management, Directors,
& Other Sources
and other sources

Discusses

&Reviews

Qualifications & expertise

and Expertise

Enterprise Strategy

Board needs

Regulatory requirements

Cognitive diversity

Needs

Diversity

Interviews

RecommendsNominees

Discusses PPGC
Recommendations

Analyzes
Independence

Selects Nominees

Vote on Nominees
at Annual Meeting


The following table summarizes certain key characteristics of the Company’s businesses and the associated qualifications, skills and experience that the PPGC believes should be represented on the Board.

BUSINESS CHARACTERISTICS

QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

The Company is a global manufacturer with products sold around the world.

Manufacturing or logistics operations experience

Broad international exposure

Technology and customer and product support services are becoming increasingly important.

Technology experience

Customer and product support experience

The Company’s businesses undertake numerous transactions in many countries and in many currencies.

Diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, cultural background or professional experience

High level of financial literacy

Mergers and acquisitions experience

Demand for many of the Company’s products is tied to conditions in the global commodity, energy, construction and transportation markets.

Experience in the evaluation of global economic conditions

Knowledge of commodity, energy, construction or transportation markets

The Company’s businesses are impacted by regulatory requirements and policies of various governmental entities around the world.

Governmental and international trade expertiseexperience

The Board’s responsibilities include understanding and overseeing the various risks facing the Company and ensuring that appropriate policies and procedures are in place to effectively manage risk.

Risk oversight/management expertise

Relevant executive and leadership experience

Cybersecurity experience


16 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsNOMINATIONS FROM SHAREHOLDERS

The Board values diversity of talents, skills, abilities and experiences and believes that Board diversity of all types provides significant benefits to the Company. Although the Board has no specific diversity policy, the PPGC considers the diversity of the Board and potential director candidates in selecting new director candidates.

NOMINATIONS FROM SHAREHOLDERS

The PPGC considers unsolicited inquiries and director nominees recommended by shareholders in the same manner as nominees from all other sources. Recommendations should be sent to the CorporateSecretary at 510LakeCookRoad,Suite100, NE Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois 61629.Deerfield,IL60015. Shareholders may nominate a director candidate to serve on the Board byfollowingby following the procedures described in our bylaws. Deadlines for shareholder nominations for Caterpillar’s 2018 annual meeting2021 Annual Meeting of shareholdersShareholders are included in the “Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 20182021 Annual Meeting” section on page 73.58.

The number of persons comprising the Caterpillar Board of Directors is currently established as 11. If any of the Board’s nominees should become unavailable to serve as a Director prior to the Annual Meeting, the size of the Board and number of Board nominees will be reduced accordingly.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    13


Back to Contents

DIRECTORCANDIDATEBIOGRAPHIESANDQUALIFICATIONS

Directors have been in their current positions for the past five years unless otherwise noted. Information is as of April 14, 2020. The Board has nominated the following individuals to stand for election for a one-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2021.

  

KELLY A. AYOTTE

Former U.S. Senator representing New Hampshire

Age 51

Director since: 2017

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

The Blackstone Group Inc.

Boston Properties, Inc.

News Corporation

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Public Policy and Governance

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

Bloom Energy Corporation

FormerSenatorAyotte provides the Board with leadership experience and in-depth knowledge in the areas of public policy, government and law from her experience as U.S. Senator, Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, and Chief of the Homicide Prosecution Unit for New Hampshire. She offers valuable insights on important public policy issues from her service on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee and financial experience from her service on the Senate Budget Committee. In addition to the directorships mentioned above, former Senator Ayotte currently serves on three nonprofit boards that focus on human rights and other global issues.

  

DAVID L. CALHOUN

President and CEO of

The Boeing Company (aircraft and defense)

Age 62

Director since: 2011

INDEPENDENT

Presiding Director

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

The Boeing Company

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Public Policy and Governance, Chair

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

Gates Industrial Corporation plc

Nielsen Holdings plc

Mr.Calhoun has been President and CEO of The Boeing Company since 2020. Prior to leading Boeing, Calhoun served as senior managing director and head of portfolio operations at The Blackstone Group from 2014. Previously, he also served as executive chairman of the board for Nielsen Holdings from January 2014 to January 2016 and served as Nielsen CEO for seven years beginning in 2006. Mr. Calhoun began his career at The General Electric Company (GE), where he rose to vice chairman of the company and president and chief executive officer of GE Infrastructure, its largest business unit. During his 26 years at GE, he held a number of operating, finance and marketing roles, and led multiple business units, including GE Transportation and GE Aircraft Engines.He provides valuable insight and perspective to the Board on strategic and business matters, stemming from his extensive operational, executive and management experience with Blackstone and Nielsen and his previous roles at General Electric (GE). He provides valuable insight and perspective to the Board on strategic and business matters, stemming from his extensive operational, executive and management experience. The Board elected Mr. Calhoun as Presiding Director in 2018.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    14


Back to Contents

  

DANIEL M. DICKINSON

Managing Partner of HCI Equity Partners (private equity firm)

Age 58

Director since: 2006

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

None

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Audit, Chair

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

None

Mr.Dickinson has served as Managing Partner of HCI Equity Partners since 2001. His experience in mergers and acquisitions, private equity business and investment banking provides important insights for evaluating investment opportunities. Mr. Dickinson’s significant financial experience, both in the U.S. and internationally, contributes to the Board’s understanding and ability to analyze complex issues. His experience as a former director of a large, publicly-traded multinational corporation enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board.

  

JUAN GALLARDO

Chairman and Former CEO of Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V. (beverage industry)

Age 72

Director since: 1998

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico, S.A.B. de C.V.

Grupo Financiero Santander Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V.

Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V.

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Public Policy and Governance

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

LafargeHolcim Ltd.

Mr.Gallardo is Chairman of Organización CULTIBA, S.A.B. de C.V. where he retired as CEO in February 2016. Mr. Gallardo resides in Mexico, where Caterpillar has a presence. The Board believes Mr. Gallardo’s international business experience, particularly in Latin America, is important for the Company’s understanding of these markets. His extensive background and active engagement in trade-related issues also contributes to the Board’s expertise. In addition, his experience as a CEO and director of other large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board in many areas, including risk oversight and strategy.

  

WILLIAM A. OSBORN

Former Chairman and CEO of Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company (financial services)

Age 72

Director since: 2000

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

Abbott Laboratories

General Dynamics Corporation

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Audit

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

None

Mr.Osborn retired as Chairman in 2009 and as CEO in 2008 of Northern Trust Corporation and The Northern Trust Company. He provides the Board with valuable financial expertise and experience. In addition, his experience as a CEO and director of other large, publicly-traded corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance in many areas, including public company governance, corporate finance and risk oversight.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    15


Back to Contents

  

DEBRA L. REED-KLAGES

Former Chairman and CEO of Sempra Energy (energy infrastructure and utilities)

Age 63

Director since: 2015

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

Chevron Corporation

Lockheed Martin Corporation

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Compensation and Human Resources

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

Halliburton Company

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC

Sempra Energy

Ms.Reed-Klages retired as Chairman of the Board and CEO of Sempra Energy in 2018, having served in these roles since 2012 and 2011, respectively. The power, oil and gas industries are key end-user markets for Caterpillar products and the Board believes Ms. Reed-Klages’ background provides valuable insights into trends in these industries. In addition, her experience as a CEO and director of other large, publicly-traded corporations enables her to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board. Ms. Reed-Klages’ areas of expertise include commodity markets, sustainability and international operations.

  

EDWARD B. RUST, JR.

Former Chairman and CEO of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (insurance)

Age 69

Director since: 2003

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

S&P Global Inc.

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Audit

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

None

Mr.Rust retired as Chairman in 2016 and as CEO in 2015 of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. His financial and business experience is valuable to the Board. His role as a past Chairman of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, CEO of a major national corporation and experience as a director of other large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board, including with respect to public company governance and strategy. In addition, his extensive involvement in education improvement complements the Company’s culture of social responsibility.

  

SUSAN C. SCHWAB

Professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy and Strategic Advisor for Mayer Brown LLP (global law firm)

Age 65

Director since: 2009

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

The Boeing Company

FedEx Corporation

Marriott International, Inc.

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Public Policy and Governance

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

None

AmbassadorSchwab has been Professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy since 2009 and Strategic Advisor for Mayer Brown LLP since 2010. She held various positions previously, including U.S. Trade Representative (member of the President’s Cabinet) and Assistant Secretary of Commerce. Ambassador Schwab brings extensive knowledge, insight and experience on international trade and commerce issues to the Board. Her educational experience and role as the U.S. Trade Representative provide important insights for the Company’s global business model and long-standing support of open trade. In addition, her experience as a director of other large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables her to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board, including on strategy and the evaluation of global economic conditions.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    16


Back to Contents

  

D. JAMES UMPLEBY III

Chairman and CEO of Caterpillar Inc.

Age 62

Director since: 2017

MANAGEMENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

Chevron Corporation

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

None

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

None

Mr.Umpleby has been CEO of Caterpillar since January 1, 2017, and was elected Chairman of the Board in 2018. He served as a Group President of Caterpillar from 2013 to 2016 with responsibility for Caterpillar’s Energy & Transportation segment and served as a Caterpillar Vice President and President of Solar Turbines from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Umpleby developed a deep knowledge of the Company and its end markets by serving in a wide range of leadership roles. He has extensive international experience and has worked in manufacturing, engineering, marketing, sales and services. Mr. Umpleby’s strategic planning and execution skills, along with his extensive industry experience, enables him to provide effective leadership of the Company and the Board.

  

MILES D. WHITE

Executive Chairman of the Board, Abbott Laboratories (medical devices and biotechnology)

Age 65

Director since: 2011

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

Abbott Laboratories

McDonald’s Corporation

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Compensation and Human Resources, Chair

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

None

Mr.White serves as Executive Chairman of the Board of Abbott Laboratories. Mr. White, who joined Abbott in 1984, served as Abbott’s Chairman and CEO from 1999 to 2020. His experience leading a large, complex multinational company provides important insight to the Board. Mr. White’s skills include knowledge of cross-border operations, strategy and business development, risk assessment, finance, leadership development and succession planning, and corporate governance matters. In addition to his role with Abbott Laboratories, Mr. White’s experience as a director of other large, publicly-traded multinational corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board.

  

RAYFORD WILKINS, JR.

Former CEO of Diversified Businesses at AT&T Inc. (telecommunications)

Age 68

Director since: 2017

INDEPENDENT

OTHER CURRENT DIRECTORSHIPS:

Morgan Stanley

Valero Energy Corporation

CATERPILLAR BOARD COMMITTEE

Compensation and Human Resources

OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS:

None

Mr.Wilkins retired as CEO of Diversified Businesses at AT&T Inc. in 2012. His expertise and oversight experience in the information technology arena is valuable to the Board. In addition, Mr. Wilkins’ experience as a CEO and director of other large, publicly-traded corporations enables him to provide meaningful input and guidance to the Board, including with respect to corporate finance and customer and product support.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    17


Back to Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation for our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2019. Mr. Umpleby, who served as Chairman and CEO during 2019, did not receive separate compensation for his service on the Board.

Compensation for non-employee directors for 2019 was comprised of the following components:

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Units (1 Year Vesting)

$

150,000

 

Cash Retainer

$

150,000

 

Cash Stipends:

 

 

 

Presiding Director

$

50,000

(1) 

Audit Committee Chairman

$

30,000

(2) 

Compensation and Human Resources Committee Chairman

$

25,000

(2) 

Public Policy and Governance Committee Chairman

$

20,000

(2) 

(1)

Cash stipend effective January 1, 2019

(2)

Cash stipend effective April 10, 2019

 

Directors are required to own Caterpillar common stock equal to five times their annual cash retainer. Directors have a five-year period from the date of their election or appointment to meet the target ownership guidelines. All Directors are in compliance with these guidelines. In addition, under the Company’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, directors may defer 50 percent or more of their annual cash retainer and stipend into an interest-bearing account or an account representing phantom shares of Caterpillar stock, and effective for grants made on or after January 1, 2019, directors may defer 50 percent or more of any stock-based compensation (other than options and stock appreciation rights) upon vesting into an account representing phantom shares of Caterpillar stock. Directors that joined the Board prior to April 1, 2008, also are able to participate in a Charitable Award Program, under which a donation of up to $500,000 will be made by the Company in the director’s name to charitable organizations selected by the director and a donation of up to $500,000 also will be made by the Company in the director’s name to the Caterpillar Foundation. Directors derive no financial benefit from the Charitable Award Program.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    18


Back to Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2019

Director

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

 

Restricted

Stock Units(2)

All Other

Compensation(3)

 

 

Total

Kelly A. Ayotte

$

150,000

 

$

149,971

 

$

 

$

299,971

David L. Calhoun

$

214,505

(1)

$

149,971

 

$

 

$

364,476

Daniel M. Dickinson

$

171,758

(1)

$

149,971

 

$

29,657

 

$

351,386

Juan Gallardo

$

150,000

 

$

149,971

 

$

14,725

 

$

314,696

Dennis A. Muilenburg (4)

$

150,000

 

$

149,971

 

$

 

$

299,971

William A. Osborn

$

156,992

(1)

$

149,971

 

$

19,725

 

$

326,688

Debra L. Reed-Klages

$

150,000

 

$

149,971

 

$

2,000

 

$

301,971

Edward B. Rust, Jr.

$

154,245

(1)

$

149,971

 

$

29,988

 

$

334,204

Susan C. Schwab

$

150,000

 

$

149,971

 

$

17,000

 

$

316,971

Miles D. White

$

173,750

(1)

$

149,971

 

$

8,000

 

$

331,721

Rayford Wilkins, Jr.

$

150,000

 

$

149,971

 

$

5,000

 

$

304,971

 

(1)

Total fees earned or paid in 2019 include pro-rated Cash Stipends for directors who transitioned between committee chair positions over the course of the year.

(2)

As of December 31, 2019, the number of RSUs (including accrued dividend equivalent units) and Phantom Shares held by those serving as non-employee directors during 2019 was: Ms. Ayotte: 1,898 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 789 Phantom Shares); Mr. Calhoun: 16,598 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 15,489 Phantom Shares); Mr. Dickinson: 28,950 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 27,841 Phantom Shares); Mr. Gallardo: 36,127 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 35,018 Phantom Shares); Mr. Muilenburg: 1,109 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs); Mr. Osborn: 2,263 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 1,154 Phantom Shares); Ms. Reed-Klages: 8,212 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 7,103 Phantom Shares); Mr. Rust: 37,762 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 36,653 Phantom Shares); Ms. Schwab: 14,921 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 13,812 Phantom Shares); Mr. White: 11,867 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs and 10,758 Phantom Shares); and Mr. Wilkins: 1,109 (which consists of 1,109 RSUs). Mr. Calhoun, Mr. Gallardo, Ms. Reed-Klages, Ms. Schwab and Mr. White elected to defer 100 percent of their Cash Retainer and Cash Stipend (as applicable) into Phantom Shares of Caterpillar stock in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan which are included in these Phantom Shares totals.

(3)

All Other Compensation represents amounts paid in connection with the Caterpillar Foundation’s Directors’ Charitable Award Program and the Caterpillar Political Action Committee Charitable Matching Program (CATPAC’s PACMATCH program) and administrative fees associated with the Director’s Charitable Award Program. All outside directors are eligible to participate in the Caterpillar Foundation Matching Gift Program, and eligible directors may participate in the CATPAC’s PACMATCH program annually. The Caterpillar Foundation will match contributions to eligible two-year or four-year colleges or universities, arts and cultural institutions, and public policy or environmental organizations, up to a maximum of $2,000 per eligible organization per calendar year. The amounts listed include the Charitable Foundation matching gifts as follows: Mr. Dickinson $4,000, Ms. Reed-Klages $2,000, Mr. Rust $14,000, Ms. Schwab $12,000 and Mr. White $8,000. As part of CATPAC’s PACMATCH program, Caterpillar Inc. will contribute to two charities on behalf of eligible members of the Board of Directors. The annual CATPAC’s PACMATCH match limit is $5,000. Mr. Osborn, Mr. Rust, Ms. Schwab and Mr. Wilkins had contributions matched. For directors eligible to participate in the Directors Charitable Award Program, the amounts listed represent the insurance premium and administrative fees as follows: Mr. Dickinson $25,657, Mr. Gallardo $14,725, Mr. Osborn $14,725 and Mr. Rust $10,988.

(4)

Mr. Muilenburg resigned from the Board effective January 26, 2020.

BOARDELECTIONANDLEADERSHIPSTRUCTURE

Directors are elected at each annual meeting to serve for a one-year term. In uncontested elections, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast for such directorship. If an incumbent director does not receive a greater number of “for” votes than “against” votes, such director must tender his or her resignation to the Board. In contested elections, directors are elected by a plurality vote.

The mandatory retirement age for directors is 74. Each director who will have reached the age of 74, on or before the date of the next shareholders’ meeting, shall not stand for re-election at that annual meeting of the shareholders without an express waiver by the Board.

Under Caterpillar’s bylaws, the directors annually elect a Chairman. The Board has no fixed policy on whether to have an executive or non-executive chairman and believes this determination should be made based on the best interests of the Company and its shareholders in light of the circumstances at the time. On the recommendation of the PPGC, the Board has elected D. James Umpleby III as its Chairman and David L. Calhoun as its Presiding Director.

In the role of Presiding Director, Mr. Calhoun provides strong independent oversight of management and serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman and CEO, as further described below. Mr. Calhoun also leads the Board’s annual evaluation of Mr. Umpleby, and the independent members of the Board set Mr. Umpleby’s compensation annually based on the recommendation of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    19


Back to Contents

DUTIESANDRESPONSIBILITIESOFPRESIDINGDIRECTOR

Preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman & CEO is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors.

Serve as a liaison between the Chairman & CEO and the independent directors.

Approve the type of information sent to the Board.

Provide input and approve meeting agendas for the Board.

Approve meeting schedules, in consultation with the Chairman & CEO and the independent directors, to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items.

Has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors.

If requested by major shareholders, is available, when appropriate, for consultation and direct communication.

Provide the Chairman & CEO with the results of his/her annual performance review in conjunction with the chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee.

The Board believes it is important to maintain flexibility as to the Board’s leadership structure. The Board will continue to regularly review its leadership structure and exercise its discretion in adopting an appropriate and effective framework to assure effective governance and accountability, taking into consideration the needs of the Board and the Company.

CORPORATEGOVERNANCEGUIDELINESANDCODEOFCONDUCT

Our Board has adopted Guidelines on Corporate Governance Issues (Corporate Governance Guidelines), which are available on our website at www.caterpillar.com/governance. The guidelines reflect the Board’s commitment to oversee the effectiveness of policy and decision-making both at the Board and management level, with a view to enhance shareholder value over the long term.

Caterpillar’s code of conduct is called Our Values in Action. Integrity, Excellence, Teamwork, Commitment and Sustainability are the core values identified in the code. Our Values in Action apply to all members of the Board and to management and employees worldwide. These values embody the high ethical standards that Caterpillar has upheld since its formation in 1925. Our Values in Action is available on our website at www.caterpillar.com/code.

BOARDEVALUATIONPROCESS

The Board conducts an annual self-evaluation to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. In 2019, the Chairman of the Public Policy and Governance Committee interviewed each Board member to solicit their feedback. The Public Policy and Governance Chairman then led a discussion during the Board’s executive session. Each of the committees of the Board followed a similar process and reported to the Board on the outcome of their self-evaluations. The self-evaluation provides the Board with actionable feedback to enhance its performance and effectiveness.

BOARDCOMMITTEES

The Board has three standing committees: Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Public Policy and Governance. Each committee meets regularly throughout the year, reports its actions and recommendations to the Board, receives reports from management, annually evaluates its performance and has the authority to retain outside advisors at its discretion. The current primary responsibilities of each committee are summarized below and set forth in more detail in each committee’s written charter, which can be found on Caterpillar’s website at www.caterpillar.com/governance. All committee members are independent under Company, NYSE and SEC standards applicable to Board and committee service, and the Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” and an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    20


Back to Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE

CommitteeMembers:
Daniel M. Dickinson,
   Chairman
William A. Osborn
Edward B. Rust, Jr.

NumberofMeetingsin2019:10

COMMITTEEROLESANDRESPONSIBILITIES

Selects and oversees independent auditors, including annual evaluation of the lead audit partner.

Oversees our financial reporting activities, including our financial statements, annual report and accounting standards and principles.

Reviews with management the Company’s risk assessment and risk management framework.

Approves audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors.

Reviews the organization, scope and effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit function, disclosures and internal controls.

Sets parameters for and monitors the Company’s hedging and derivatives practices.

Provides oversight for the Company’s compliance program and Code of Conduct.

Monitors any significant litigation, regulatory, and tax compliance matters.

Oversees information technology systems and related security.

Reviews with management cybersecurity risks and strategy to mitigate these risks.

COMPENSATIONANDHUMANRESOURCESCOMMITTEE

CommitteeMembers:
Miles D. White, Chairman
Debra L. Reed-Klages
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.

NumberofMeetingsin2019:6

COMMITTEEROLESANDRESPONSIBILITIES

Recommends the CEO’s compensation to the Board and establishes the compensation of other executive officers.

Establishes, approves and oversees the Company’s equity compensation and employee benefit plans.

Reviews incentive compensation arrangements to ensure that incentive pay does not encourage unnecessary risk-taking, and reviews and discusses the relationship between risk management policies and practices, corporate strategy and executive compensation.

Recommends to the Board the compensation of independent directors.

Provides oversight of the Company’s diversity and immigration practices and employee relations.

Furnishes an annual Committee Report on executive compensation and approves the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in the Company’s proxy statement.

PUBLICPOLICYANDGOVERNANCECOMMITTEE

CommitteeMembers:
David L. Calhoun, Chairman
Kelly A. Ayotte
Juan Gallardo
Susan C. Schwab

NumberofMeetingsin2019:6

COMMITTEEROLESANDRESPONSIBILITIES

Makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size and composition of the Board and its committees, and the criteria to be used for the selection of candidates to serve on the Board.

Discusses and evaluates the qualifications of potential and incumbent directors and recommends the director candidates to be nominated for election at the Annual Meeting.

Leads the Board in its annual self-evaluation process.

Oversees the Company’s senior executive succession planning.

Oversees the Company’s environmental, health and safety activities and sustainability.

Oversees the Company’s corporate governance.

Reviews/advises on matters of domestic and international public policy affecting the Company’s business, such as trade policy and international trade negotiations and major global legislative and regulatory developments.

Annually reviews the Company’s charitable contributions to the Caterpillar Foundation and political contributions and policies.

Oversees investor, customer, community and government relations.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    21


Back to Contents

DIRECTORINDEPENDENCEDETERMINATIONS

The Company’s Guidelines on Corporate Governance GuidelinesIssues establish that no more than two non-independent directors may serve on the Board at any point in time. A director is “independent” if he or she has no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or with senior management of the Company and their respective affiliates. Annually, the Board makes an affirmative determination regarding the independence of each director based upon the recommendation of the PPGCandPPGC and in accordance with the standards in the Company’s Guidelines on Corporate Governance Guidelines,Issues, which are available on our website at www.caterpillar.com/governance.governance.

Applying these standards, the Board determined that each of the director nominees, and all other directors who served during 2019, met the independence standards except JimMr. Umpleby, who is a current employee of the Company.

COMMUNICATIONWITHTHEBOARDCOMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD

Shareholders, employees and all other interested parties may communicate with any of our directors individually, our Board as a group, our independent directors as a group or any Board committee as a group by email or regular mail:

BY EMAIL

BY MAIL

send an email to
Directors@CAT.comdirectors@cat.com

BY MAIL
mail to Caterpillar Inc.
c/o Corporate Secretary
510 Lake Cook Road, Suite 100 NE Adams Street
Peoria, Illinois 61629
Deerfield, IL 60015


CONTACTING CATERPILLAR

While the Board oversees management, it does not participate in day-to-day management functions or business operations. If you wish to submit questions or comments relating to these matters, please use the Contact Us form on our website at www.caterpillar.com/contact, which will help direct your message to the appropriate area of our Company.

All communications regarding personal grievances, administrative matters, the conduct of the Company’s ordinary business operations, billing issues, product or service related inquiries, order requests and similar issues will be directed to the appropriate individual within the Company. The Chairman of the Board has instructed the Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to consult with him if heshe is unsure who should receive the communication. If a legitimate communication is sent, you will receive a written acknowledgement from the Corporate Secretary’s office confirming receipt of your communication.

Contacting Caterpillar. While the Board oversees management, it does not participate in day-to-day management functions or business operations. If you wish to submit questions or comments relating to these matters, please use the Contact Us form on our website at www.caterpillar.com/contact, which will help direct your message to the appropriate area of our Company.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |17




Table of ContentsINVESTOROUTREACH

INVESTOR OUTREACH

We conduct an annual governance review and shareholder outreach throughout the year to ensure that management and the Board understand and consider the issues that matter most to our shareholders and reflect the insights and perspectives of our many stakeholders.

WHO PARTICIPATES IN THE INVESTOR OUTREACH PROGRAM?

IN WHAT TYPES OF ENGAGEMENT DOES THE COMPANY PARTICIPATE?

Board of Directors

Senior Management

Investor Relations

Corporate Secretary

Investor conferences

One-on-one meetings

Earnings calls

Investor and analyst calls

AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS

Third parties regularly recognize our employees’ innovation, leadership and workplace satisfaction. We are pleased to highlight some of these 2016 awards here.

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITYCORPORATE REPUTATION AND LEADERSHIP
Dow Jones Sustainability Index – World and North America
United Way Worldwide’s Global Corporate Leadership Program
Golden Peacock Award for Sustainability (India)
AmCham Cares Award – American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore (Singapore)
Top 10 Companies for Contribution of Fortune Global 500 (China)
2016 China Philanthropic Enterprise of the Year (China)
2016 China CSR Award (China)
2016 Best Partner Award of Foreign-Invested Enterprises (China)
China Baosteel Environmental Award – China Environmental Protection Foundation (China)
Poverty Alleviation Ambassador Award – China Foundation for Poverty Alleviation (China)
World’s Most Admired Companies – Fortune Magazine
ANNY Excellence in Analytics Award – International Institute for Analytics
Best Global Brands Top 100 – Interbrand
Top 50 Best Companies To Interview For – Glassdoor
Top 10 Employer – Woman Engineer Magazine
Top 150 Global Licensors – Global License
Top 25 Noteworthy Companies – DiversityInc
Top 50 Employer – CAREERS & the disABLED Magazine
Dedicated to STEM Diversity – Diversity in Action
Leading Disability Employer – National Organization on Disability
U.S. Military Friendly® Employer
Best Industry to Work For in Brazil – Você S/A Magazine (Brazil)
Top 5 Best Companies to Work For in Brazil – Época Magazine (Brazil)
Top 10 Best Companies to Work For in Brazil (Perkins - Brazil)
The UK’s Most Popular Graduate Recruiters 2016/17 (United Kingdom)
Top 100 Undergraduate Employers (United Kingdom)
Family Friendly Employer (Mexico)
#2 Great Place to Work (Panama)
#3 Great Place to Work (Central America)

18 |

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    22


Back to Contents

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsPOLITICALCONTRIBUTIONSANDLOBBYING

SUSTAINABILITY

Caterpillar has set aspirational goals for its operations and product stewardship. We believe these standards affirm our determination to lead our industry to a more sustainable future. You can track our progress towards achieving these goals by visiting our website www.caterpillar.com/sustainability.

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND LOBBYING

The actions that governments take can impact the Company, our employees, customers and shareholders. It is important for government leaders to understand the impact of such actions. For this reason, the Company participates in the political process and advocates in a responsible and constructive manner on issues that advance the Company’s goals and protect shareholder value.

To promote transparency and good corporate citizenship, the Company provides voluntary disclosure relating to theits political contribution activities of the Company and its political action committee, its engagement in public policy issues and global issues of importance to the Company, including detailed information on the Company’s position with respect to such issues. This information is disclosed on our website

2017 Proxy Statement

 |19




Table of Contents

at www.caterpillar.com/contributions and includes an itemized list of organizations and individuals that received political contributions from Caterpillar or the Caterpillar Political Action Committee. It also includes a summary of some of the public policy issues important to the Company that may cause us to engage in public advocacy.

Caterpillar’s political and advocacy activities at both the state, federal and federalinternational levels are managed by the Vice President, Global Government & Corporate Affairs, who coordinates andreviewsand reviews with senior management the legislative and regulatory priorities that are significant to the Company’s business, and shareholders, as well as related advocacy activities. To ensure appropriate Board oversight of political activities, the Board’s Public Policy and Governance Committee receives regular briefingsreviews the Company’s policy on political activities and contributions and Caterpillar’s significant political activities, including corporate political contributions, political contribution activities of the Company’sCaterpillar Political Action Committee, trade association participation and Caterpillar’s legislative and regulatory priorities, the Company’s political spending and trade association expenditures as well as the activities of Caterpillar’s Political Action Committee.priorities.

RELATEDPARTYTRANSACTIONSRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Caterpillar has a written processpolicy governing the approval of transactions with the Company that are expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year in which any director, executive officer or their immediate family members will have a direct or indirect material interest. Under the process,policy, all such transactions must be approved in advance or ratified by the PPGC.

Prior to entering into such a transaction, theThe director or officer must submit the details of the proposed transaction to the Company’s Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, including whether the related person or his or her immediate family member has or will haveahave a direct or indirect interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a less than 10 percent beneficial owner of an entity involved in the transaction). The Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary will then submit the matter to the PPGC for its consideration.

The Board concluded that each director, other than Mr. Umpleby, is independent.From time to time, related persons of Caterpillar may purchase products or services of the Company and its subsidiaries. In reaching this determination the Board considered,connection with respectthese purchases, Caterpillar may provide marketing support directly or indirectly through independent dealers, consistent with sales under similar circumstances to Ms. Reed, ordinary course business between Sempra Energy and Caterpillar involving the purchase or sale of equipment, engines and energy.unaffiliated third parties.


20 |

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    23


Back to Contents

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsAUDIT

PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT
What am I voting on?

The Board seeks an indication from shareholders of their approval or disapproval of the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as the Company’s independent auditor for 2017.

Voting Recommendation:
FORthe ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm.


What am I voting on?

Shareholders are being asked to approve the ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) as the Company’s independent auditor for 2020.

Board Voting Recommendation:

FOR the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee (AC) is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent auditor. PricewaterhouseCoopersPwC has been ourCaterpillar’s independent auditor since 1925. Through its extensive experience with the Company, PwC has gained institutional knowledge and a deep understanding of the Company’s operations and business, accounting policies and practices and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit CommitteeAC believes that the retention of PricewaterhouseCoopersPwC to serve as the Company’s independent auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. If the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopersPwC is not approved by the shareholders, the Audit CommitteeAC will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent auditor.

Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopersPwC will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. The representatives will also be available to respond to questions at the meeting.

AUDITFEESANDAPPROVALPROCESSAUDIT FEES AND APPROVAL PROCESS

The Audit CommitteeAC pre-approves all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules regarding auditor independence. The policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service and do not delegate the Audit Committee’sAC’s responsibility to management. The policies and procedures address any service provided by the independent auditors and any audit or audit-related services to be provided by any other audit service provider. The pre-approval process includes an annual and interim component.

Annually, not later than February of each year, management and the independent auditors jointly submit a service matrix of the types of audit and non-audit services that management may wish to have the independent auditor perform for the current year. The service matrix categorizes the types of services byaudit,by audit, audit-related, tax and all other services. Management and the independent auditors jointly submit an annual pre-approval limits request. The request lists aggregate pre-approval limits by service category. The request also lists known or anticipated services and associated fees. The Audit CommitteeAC approves or rejects the pre-approval limits and each of the listed services on the service matrix.

During the course of the year, the Audit CommitteeAC chairman has the authority to pre-approve requests for services that were not approved in the annual pre-approval process. However, all services, regardless of fee amounts, are subject to restrictions on the services allowable under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC rules regarding auditor independence. In addition, all fees are subject to ongoing monitoring by the Audit Committee.AC.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    24


Back to Contents

INDEPENDENTREGISTEREDPUBLICACCOUNTINGFIRMFEEINFORMATION

Fees for professional services provided by our independent auditor included the following (in millions):

     2016     2015
Audit Fees1$33.3$32.0
Audit-Related Fees2 1.21.3
Tax Compliance Fees30.40.4
Tax Planning And Consulting Fees40.10.2
All Other Fees5 0.119.8
TOTAL$35.1$53.7

2017 Proxy Statement

 |21



 

 

 

2019

2018

Audit Fees(1)

 

$

35.5

 

33.6

Audit-Related Fees(2)

 

 

0.6

 

1.6

Tax Compliance Fees(3)

 

 

0.1

 

0.5

Tax Planning And Consulting Fees(4)

 

 

0.1

 

0.1

All Other Fees(5)

 

 

0.1

 

0.2

TOTAL

 

$

36.4

$

36.0

(1)

“Audit Fees” principally includes audit and review of financial statements (including internal control over financial reporting), statutory and subsidiary audits, SEC registration statements, comfort letters and consents.

(2)

“Audit-Related Fees” principally includes attestation services requested by management, accounting consultations, pre- or post-implementation reviews of processes or systems and audits of employee benefit plan financial statements. Total fees paid directly by the benefit plans, and not by the Company, were $0.6 million in each of 2019 and 2018 and are not included in the amounts shown above.

(3)

“Tax Compliance Fees” includes, among other things, statutory tax return preparation and review and advice on the impact of changes in local tax laws.

(4)

“Tax Planning and Consulting Fees” includes, among other things, tax planning and advice and assistance with respect to transfer pricing issues.

(5)

“All Other Fees” consists principally of license-based services for statutory audit monitoring and accounting and reporting literature research.


Table of ContentsANONYMOUSREPORTINGOFACCOUNTINGANDOTHERCONCERNS

1 “Audit Fees” principally includes audit and review of financial statements (including internal control over financial reporting), statutory and subsidiary audits, SEC registration statements, comfort letters and consents.
2 “Audit-Related Fees” principally includes attestation services requested by management, accounting consultations, pre- or post- implementation reviews of processes or systems and audits of employee benefit plan financial statements. Total fees paid directly by the benefit plans, and not by the Company, were $0.6 million in 2016 and $1.0 million in 2015 and are not included in the amounts shown above.
3 “Tax Compliance Fees” includes, among other things, statutory tax return preparation and review and advice on the impact of changes in local tax laws.
4 “Tax Planning and Consulting Fees” includes, among other things, tax planning and advice and assistance with respect to transfer pricing issues.
5 “All Other Fees” consist principally of strategy consulting services provided by Booz & Company, which was acquired by PricewaterhouseCoopers in 2014 and renamed Strategy&. The Company stopped engaging Strategy& in 2015.

ANONYMOUS REPORTING OF ACCOUNTING CONCERNS

The Audit CommitteeAC has established a means for the anonymous and other reporting (where permitted by law) of (i) suspected or actual violations of the code of conduct, our enterprise policies or applicable laws, including those related to accounting practices, internal controls or auditing matters and procedures; (ii) theft or fraud of any amount; (iii) insider trading; (iv) issues with respect to the performance and execution of contracts; (v) conflicts of interest; (vi) violations of securities and antitrust laws; and (vii) violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.prohibited harassment policy; and (viii) violations of any applicable anti-bribery law.

Any employee, supplier, customer, shareholder or other interested party can submit a report via the following methods:

Direct Telephone: 309-494-4393 (English only)

Call Collect Helpline: 770-582-5275 (language translation available)

Confidential Fax: 309-494-4818

Email: BusinessPractices@CAT.comBusinessPractices@cat.com

Internet: www.caterpillar.com/obp

AUDITCOMMITTEEREPORTAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is composedAC operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of four directors, allDirectors, and each of whom meetits members meets the independence and financial literacy standards contained in the NYSE Listed Company rules, SEC rules and Caterpillar’s Guidelines on Corporate Governance Issues,Issues. The Board has determined that each member of the AC qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under SEC rules and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.has accounting or related financial management expertise.

Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. PricewaterhouseCoopers,PwC, acting as independent auditor, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).

The Audit CommitteeAC has discussed with the Company’s independent auditor the overall scope and execution of the independent audit and has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management. The Audit CommitteeAC also discussed with the independent auditors other matters required by PCAOB auditing standards.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    25


Back to Contents

The independent auditors provided to the Audit CommitteeAC the written communications required by applicable standards of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit CommitteeAC concerning independence, and the Audit CommitteeAC discussed the independent auditors’ independence with management and the auditors. The Audit CommitteeAC also considered whether the provision of other non-audit services by the Company’s independent auditors to the Company is compatible with maintaining independence.

The Audit CommitteeAC concluded that the independent auditors’ independence had not been impaired.

Based on the reviews and discussion referred to above, the Audit CommitteeAC recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

By the members of the Audit Committee as of April 1, 2017 consisting of:Committee:

Daniel M. DickinsonWilliam A. OsbornDennis A. Muilenburg
(Chairman)


22 |

Daniel M. Dickinson, Chairman

William A. Osborn

Edward B. Rust, Jr.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    26


Back to Contents

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsCOMPENSATION

PROPOSAL 3ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT
What am I voting on?

What am I voting on?

Shareholders are being asked to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.

Board Voting Recommendation:

FOR approval of executive compensation.

Voting Recommendation:
FORproposal

On an annual basis, and in compliance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, shareholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation of Caterpillar’s named executive officers as described under “Compensation‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion associated with the compensation tables in Caterpillar’s proxy statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is hereby APPROVED.”

This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on Caterpillar, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee (Committee)(CHRC) or the Board. The Board and the CommitteeCHRC value the opinion of Caterpillar’s shareholders, and to the extent there is any significant vote against Caterpillar’s named executive officer compensation, the Board will consider the reasons for such a vote, and the CommitteeCHRC will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    27


Back to Contents

COMPENSATION 23




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

GOVERNANCEANDPAYFORPERFORMANCEPHILOSOPHYEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

I.Governance and Pay for Performance Philosophy
II.Compensation Program Structure
III.Business Performance and Results
IV. Pay Outcomes Demonstrate Alignment with Company Performance

I. GOVERNANCE AND PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PHILOSOPHY

The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the Committee)(CHRC) believes the executive compensation program at Caterpillar should be structured to align the interests of executives and shareholders. The program should seek to rewardTheir interest lies in rewarding value creation at all stages of ourthe business cycle and provideproviding an increasing percentage of performance-based compensation at higher levels of executive responsibility. This performance-based compensation should be both market competitive and internally equitable.

Beginning in 2015, we significantly expandedChanges made over the years to further align pay with performance have received favorable feedback from our ongoing shareholder outreach program. The feedback received through this engagement led us to make changes to our executive compensation programshareholders and support for our senior leadership team including the following:

AnnualIncentiveLong-Term Incentive
The maximum payout opportunity of awards in the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) for Named Executive Officers (NEOs) decreased from 200 percent of target to 150 percent of target.
In years when the Company’s forecasted operating profit is below prior year’s actualresults: (i) NEO annual incentive opportunity is reduced, and (ii) AIP payouts are capped at target.
The proportion of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs) increased from 1/3 to 1/2 of the total long-term target incentive value.
The sizing of long-term incentive grant values is based on relative 1, 3 and 5-year Total Shareholder Return (TSR) as compared to the S&P Industrials, Compensation Peer Group and Competitor Peer Group that the Committee has determined compete directly with the Company.

These changes were well received by our shareholders, and support for our advisory vote on our executive compensation at our 2016 Annual Meeting, commonly referred to as the “say on pay” vote, was approximately 93%, up from 65% support in the prior year. After considering the 2016 “say on pay” results, the Committee determined that the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, compensation objectives and compensation elements continued to be appropriate and did not make any specific changes to the Company’s executive compensation program in response to the 2016 “say on pay” vote. Say on PaySupport
              
 
93%65%96%
201620152014
 

24 |

2017 Proxy Statement




Table2019 “say on pay” vote of Contents95 percent reflects this positive response.

In 2016,2019, we continued our shareholder outreach effort,on environmental, social, governance and compensation topics, reaching out to the holders of approximately half40 percent of our outstanding shares, to discuss various matters including governance, executive compensation, sustainability and operational performance. In these meetings, our shareholders generally expressed a continued positive view with respect to our executive compensation program.

SAY ON PAY SUPPORT

95%

94%

96%

2019

2018

2017

After considering feedback received from our shareholders through our outreach efforts and the 2019 “say on pay” results, the CHRC determined that the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, compensation objectives and compensation elements continued to be appropriate and made only modest changes to the executive compensation program.

The Committee engages inCHRC conducts an ongoing review of the Company’s executive compensation program to evaluate whether the program supports the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives and is closely alignedto monitor the program’s alignment with the Company’sits strategic business objectives. In connection with this ongoing review, and based on feedback received through our shareholder outreach, program, the CommitteeCHRC continues to implement and maintain what it believes are best practices for executive compensation each of which reinforces the Company’s compensation philosophy.and governance. Below is a summary of those practices.practices:

 

WHAT WE DO

WHAT WE DON’T DO

Robust stock ownership and retention guidelines (6x base salary for our CEO and 3x base salary for each of the other NEOs)

requirements

No individual change-in-control agreements

Robust annual benchmarking process

No tax gross-ups on change-in-control benefits

Rigorous CommitteeCHRC oversight of incentive metrics, goals and pay/performance relationship

Clawback Policy
Limited executive perquisites
Strict anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies
Independent compensation consultant

No individual change-in-control agreements
No tax gross-ups on change-in-control benefits

No backdating, re-pricingrepricing or granting of option awards retroactively

Clawback Policy

Limited executive perquisites

Strict anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies

Independent compensation consultant


II. COMPENSATION PROGRAM STRUCTURE

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    28


Back to Contents

COMPENSATION PROGRAM STRUCTURE

We are committed to developing and implementing an executive compensation program that directly aligns the interests of the NEOsour Named Executive Officers (NEOs) with the long-term interests of shareholders. To that end, the objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program are to attract, motivate and retain talented executive officers and to incent NEOs towho will improve Companythe company’s performance and provide long-term strategic leadership leadership. ThemajorityoftargetedtotalcompensationforourNEOsisequity-based,vestsover the long term. The majority of targeted annual compensation multipleyearsandistieddirectlytolong-termvaluecreationfor our NEOs is equity-based, vests over multiple years and is tied directly to long-term value creation for shareholders. NEO compensation is comprisedcomposed of three primary components:

Long-Term
IncentiveBASESALARY

  

ANNUALINCENTIVEPLAN(AIP)

  

Annual IncentiveLONG-TERMINCENTIVE

Base Salary

Competitivepaytoattractand retain talentedexecutives

AnopportunitytoearnanannualcashawardbasedontheCompany’sfinancialperformanceand high-priority strategicbusiness initiativesobjectives

Amixof PRSUs performance-basedrestrictedstockunits(PRSUs)and stockoptionstoalign management management’sinterestswithlong-term shareholder shareholders’interests


2017 Proxy Statement  |25



Table of Contents

Approximately 91 90percent of our CEO’s 20162019 total targeted annual total compensation was variableand/orat-riskcompensation, including 50 percent of long-term incentives in the form of PRSUs.

2019 CEO COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

CEO 2020 PROXY STATEMENT    29 Compensation Elements


91%of total compensation is variable and at-risk
 
9%16%37.5%37.5%
SalaryAIPOptionsPRSUs
  
50%of long-term incentives have performance-based vesting conditions

III. BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS


Back to Contents

BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS

Caterpillar delivered strong operational performance and achieved our best safety performance on record in 2019. We remained disciplined and focused on control of our structural costs, achieving an Enterprise Operating Profit Margin* of 15.4% on $53.8 billion of sales and revenues for the year. We generated strong operating cash flow and as a result, were able to return $6.2 billion to shareholders, including $4.0 billion in share repurchases. We also raised the dividend by 20% in 2019 and paid dividends of $2.1 billion, maintaining our status as a Dividend Aristocrat. We achieved our 2019 Investor Day Targets for operating margin and returned substantially all Machinery, Energy & Transportation (ME&T) free cash flow to shareholders.

Ourkeyfinancialandbusinessresultsfor2019includedthefollowing:

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    30


Back to Contents

IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING FISCAL 2020 COMPENSATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Due to the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Caterpillar’s business, management recommended that all Named Executive Officers not receive a 2020 base salary increase or an Annual Incentive Plan payment for 2020 fiscal year results. The CHRC and Board of Directors took the actions necessary to implement these recommendations by management.

PAY OUTCOMES DEMONSTRATE ALIGNMENT WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE

Consistent with the CHRC’s pay-for-performance philosophy, these business results for 2016 included the following:

Cost Structure

Dividend Payments and History

Paid $1.8 billion in dividends in 2016. Caterpillar has paid higher dividends to its shareholders for 23 consecutive years, and since 2007, the Company’s cash dividend has more than doubled. Caterpillar has paid a cash dividend every year since the Company was formed and has paid a quarterly dividend since 1933.

In 2016, Machinery, Energy & Transportation (ME&T) period costs and variable manufacturing costs were $2.3 billion less than 2015.

Strong Balance Sheet and Cash Flow

In 2016, ME&T operating cash flow was $3.9 billion and we maintained positive cash flow after capital expenditures (CAPEX) and dividends.
Enterprise cash on hand at the end of the year was $7.2 billion.
ME&T debt-to-capital ratio was 41 percent, within the targeted range of 30 to 45 percent.

Sales and Revenues
2016 Sales and Revenues By Segment

($ in millions)


26 |

2017 Proxy Statement




Table of Contents


IV. PAY OUTCOMES DEMONSTRATE ALIGNMENT WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE

In addition to the financial highlights noted above, the Company’s stock price increased 36.5% in 2016 and TSR for 2016 was 42%. Notwithstanding this increase in shareholder value and the accomplishments noted above, it was a challenging year for our business due to, among other things, continued weak global commodity prices and economic weakness in many countries. The challenges in our business were reflected in the resulting pay decisions made for our CEO and the other NEOs consistent with the Committee’s pay-for-performance philosophy.in 2019. Compensation outcomes for 20162019 included the following items which adversely affected the compensation of our NEOs:items:

BASE SALARY

No adjustments were made to NEO

Named Executive Officers (other than the CEO) received an average base salaries in 2016salary adjustment of 4.1 percent.

ANNUAL INCENTIVE

Because 2016 planned operating profit was below 2015 actual operating profit, the Committee determined that 2016 was a “down” year for purposes of 2016 AIP design.
Each NEO’s annual incentive opportunity was reduced by 20.9 percent in 2016, to reflect the same proportionate reduction in planned 2016 operating profit versus 2015 actual operating profit results.
Payouts for 2016 AIP were capped at the target level with no “upside” opportunity.
Actual annual

Annual incentive awards for 20162019 paid out, on average, at less than 30%85 percent of target.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE

Based on the Committee’s review of the Company’s 1, 31-, 3- and 5-year relative TSR in early 2016,Total Shareholder Return (TSR) at the 2016end of 2018, the 2019 equity grantsgrant to the NEOs were sizedCEO was set at approximately the 25th50th percentile of the compensation peer group.

The long-term cash incentive awardgroup and at or below the 50th percentile for the 2014-2016 cycle paid out at approximately 56% of target.
None of the PRSUs granted for the 2015-2017 performance period vested in 2016 and, based on aggregate performance in 2015 and 2016, are trending significantly below target.other NEOs.

CEO COMPENSATION

In 2016, our CEO’s2019, the CHRC recommended and the Board approved a 6.7% increase to Mr. Umpleby’s base salary in recognition of his performance and to further align his target compensation with the peer group median. Similarly, the Board approved a ten percent adjustment to his annual incentive for 2019. This adjustment recognized Mr. Umpleby’s demonstrated leadership in advancing the enterprise services growth strategy and for leading operational excellence improvements resulting in more durable profitability — notably, delivering greater operating margins as a percent of sales — a key driver of long-term shareholder value and the foundation of higher market multiples. The annual incentive was substantially below target level inpaid at 83% of target. Mr. Umpleby’s 2019 Long-Term Incentive grant was set at the aggregate as well as for each component of compensation other than base salary. This reduction reflects the very weak market conditions that the Company faced in 2016 and not an operating shortfall in the judgement50th percentile of the Committee.Company’s peer group reflecting the Company’s overall TSR results and performance achievements.

CEO Compensation
*

Target Value Includes: Salary of $1,600,000; annual incentive of $2,800,000; and LTI grant of $10,900,000. Total Target Value: $15,300,000.

**

Actual Value Includes: Salary of $1,575,000 (due to proration); annual incentive of $2,336,000; and LTI grant of $10,900,000. Total Actual Value: $14,811,000.


* Target Value Includes: Salary of $1,600,008, annual incentive of $2,800,000; and LTI grant of $9,273,300. Total Target value: $13,673,308.
** Actual Value Includes: Salary of $1,600,008, annual incentive of

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    31$518,000; and LTI grant of $8,268,000. Total Actual value: $10,386,008.

2017 Proxy Statement  |27



Back to Contents

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

2016 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


Douglas R. Oberhelman
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Douglas R. Oberhelman retired from the role of CEO on December 31, 2016 and remained the Executive Chairman until his retirement from the Company on March 31, 2017. In 2016, Mr. Oberhelman improved the operational execution of the Company by continuing to focus on:
Cost Management: ME&T period costs and variable manufacturing costs were $2.3 billion lower than 2015
Employee Safety: sixth consecutive year of improving employee safety
Product Quality: improved product quality and reliability metrics for machines
Market Position: machine market share saw gains over the previous 2 years


Bradley M. Halverson
Group President, Corporate
Services and Chief Financial
Officer (CFO)

Bradley M. Halverson is Group President and Chief Financial Officer with responsibilities for Corporate Services and Financial Products Division. In 2016, Mr. Halverson:
Maintained a strong financial position for the Company through the continuing cyclical decline in key end markets
Provided strategic leadership in connection with the Company’s cost reduction actions
Delivered Return On Equity in line with plan for the Company’s captive finance company, Caterpillar Financial Services
Managed credit metrics within long-term ranges despite weak end markets


Robert B. Charter
Group President, Customer &
Dealer Support

Robert B. Charter is Group President with responsibility for Customer & Dealer Support. In 2016 Mr. Charter:
Led Caterpillar’s growing aftermarket business in partnership with the various business units and dealers
Maintained aftermarket performance despite challenging end markets such as oil and gas and mining
Improved inventory management including deploying systems utilized across the Global Caterpillar Dealer network


Jim Umpleby
Group President,
Energy & Transportation

Jim Umpleby became CEO on January 1, 2017. Prior to his role as CEO, Mr. Umpleby was Group President with responsibility for Energy & Transportation. In a challenging year with declining sales in key end markets, Energy & Transportation delivered the following results:
Achieved strong profit pull through and cash flow due to aggressive cost management
Made key acquisitions in 2016 in both Oil & Gas and Rail businesses focusing on digital technologies and customer connectivity
Improved quality and safety in 2016


David P. Bozeman
Senior Vice President,
Caterpillar Enterprise
System Group

David P. Bozeman served as Senior Vice President of the Caterpillar Enterprise System Group until his departure on December 31, 2016. Under Mr. Bozeman’s leadership, Caterpillar strengthened critical order-to-delivery processes while empowering enterprise support groups to improve the Company’s worldwide manufacturing and supply chain capabilities. During his tenure, the Company:
Executed the global deployment of Lean Transformation
Established the Engineered Value Chain methodology
Reinforced foundation capabilities of Product Source Planning, Sales & Operations Planning, Global Supply Network, Capacity Planning and New Production Introduction

28 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

THE COMPENSATION PROCESS

THE COMPENSATION PROCESS

THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE (CHRC)

The CommitteeCHRC is responsible for the executive compensation program design and decision-making process for NEO compensation. The Committee regularlyRegular reviews are conducted of the Company’s executive compensation practices, including the methodologies for setting NEO total compensation, the goals of the program and the underlying compensation philosophy. The Committee also considers the recommendationsRecommendations and market data are provided by itsthe independent compensation consultant and makesto make decisions, as it deems appropriate, on executiveregarding NEO compensation based on itsthe assessment of performance and achievement of Company goals. The CommitteeCHRC also exercises its judgment as to what is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The responsibilities of the Committee are described more fully in its charter, which is available at www.caterpillar.com/governance.

The Committee,CHRC, with the support of management and theits independent compensation consultant, considers many aspects of the Company’s financial and operational performance and other factors when making executive compensation decisions.

In setting compensation levels for 2016, the Committee considered many factorsdecisions including, but not limited to:

Long-term shareholder value creation

Long-term shareholder value creation

The cyclical nature of the business

Performance relative to financial guidance provided throughout the year

Enterprise and Business Unit operational performance

Performance relative to peers and competitors

Historic absolute and relative performance

Key areas management can influence over the short- and long-term

Development and retention of top talent

Skills, experience and tenure of executive incumbents

The cyclical nature of the business
Performance relative to financial guidance provided throughout the year
Enterprise and Business Unit operational performance
Performance relative to peers and competitors
Historic absolute and relative performance
Key areas management can influence over the short and long term
Retention of management talent
Skills, experience and tenure of executive incumbents

2017 Proxy Statement

 |29




Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

The CommitteeCHRC retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) as its independent compensation consultant.consultant during 2019. Meridian provides executive and director compensation consulting services, to the Committee, including advice regarding the design and implementation of compensation programs, market information, regulatory updates and analyses and trends on executive compensation and benefits. Interactions between Meridian and management are generally limited to discussions on behalf of the CommitteeCHRC or as required to compile informationfulfill requests at the Committee’sits direction. During 2016,2019, Meridian did not provide any other services to the Company. Based on these factors, its ownthe CHRC’s evaluation of Meridian’s independence pursuant to the requirements approved and adopted by the SEC and NYSE, and information provided by Meridian, the Committee hasCHRC determined that the work performed by Meridian doesdid not raise any conflicts of interest.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    32


Back to Contents

BENCHMARKING COMPENSATION TO PEERS

2016 Compensation Peer Group2019 COMPENSATION PEER GROUP

The CommitteeCHRC regularly assesses the market competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation programs based on peer group data. The 20162019 Compensation Peer Group was established based on the following criteria:

Total sales and revenues and market capitalization of the peer companies relative to Caterpillar;

Competitors and industry segment;

Companies considered potential sources for top talent;

Global presence with a significant portion of revenues coming from non-U.S. operations; and

Geographic footprint.

Total revenue and market capitalization of the peer companies relative to Caterpillar;
2019 Compensation Peer Group*

3M Company

Competitors and industry segment;
Ford Motor Company

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

Global presence with a significant portion of revenue coming from non-U.S. operations;

Geographic footprint


2016 COMPENSATION PEER GROUP*
3M CompanyE.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyHoneywell International Inc.
Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyEmersonGeneral Electric Co.Intel Corporation
Alcoa Inc.FedEx CorporationJohnson Controls, Inc.Company

The Boeing Company

Fluor CorporationHalliburton Company

Paccar Inc.

Cisco Systems, Inc.

Honeywell International Inc.

Cummins Inc.

Ford MotorIntel Corporation

Deere & Company

Procter & Gamble Company

Johnson Controls, Inc.

Coca-Cola Company

Emerson Electric Co.

General Dynamics CorporationRaytheon Company

PACCAR Inc.

Cummins Inc.

FedEx Corporation

General Electric Company

United Technologies Corporation

Deere & Company

Fluor Corporation

Halliburton Company

*The CHRC removed Dow DuPont from the benchmarking peer group because of its split into three separate public companies in 2019. Otherwise, the 2019 Compensation Peer Group remained unchanged from the prior year.

* The 2016 peer group was modified from 2015 to add Paccar Inc. and remove Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Illinois Tool Works, Inc.BENCHMARKING METHODOLOGY

Benchmarking MethodologyTo account for differences in the size of the compensation peer group companies, market data is statistically adjusted using a regression analysis, by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant allowing for a comparison of the compensation levels to similarly-sized companies. Market data provided by the independent consultant is sourced from the Aon Total Compensation Measurement Database, and size-adjusted to Caterpillar’s three-year average revenues using regression analysis. Each element of our NEOs’ compensation is then targeted to the median of the peer group.group and adjusted above or below based on performance. To the extent an NEO’s total actual compensation exceeds the peer group median, it is due to outstanding performance, critical skills experience and tenure.notable experience. If an NEO’s compensation is below the median, it is generally due to underperformance against relevant metrics or reflective of an individual who is newer in his or her role.

2016 Competitor Peer Group2019 COMPETITOR PEER GROUP

For 2016,2019, the CommitteeCHRC also assessed the market competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation programsbusiness performance against a group of competitors that it deems to compete directly with the Company. The Committee noted that althoughAlthough the Company’s peer group described above is an appropriate benchmark for executive compensation at other similarly sized companies, the peer group data does not always provide useful comparisons to other companies that might be experiencing similar business conditions. To that end, and consistent with itsthe Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, the Committee further sought to compare the Company’s business performance with that ofis compared to its competitors by establishing a “Competitor Peer Group.”

The Committee formedCHRC uses the 2016 Competitor Peer Group (along with the 2016 Compensation Peer Group)Group and S&P 500 Industrials) to assess relative performance using TSR when sizingawarding long-term incentive awards.awards but is not used to benchmark base pay levels. The 20162019 Competitor Peer Group, which was the same as in 2018, was established based on the following criteria:

Compete in the same markets as the Company;

Offer similar products and services as the Company; or

Serve the same, or similar, industries and end users as the Company.

2019 Competitor Peer Group

Compete in the same markets as the Company;
 

Cummins Inc.

Offer similar products and services as the Company; or
Komatsu Ltd.

Serve the same, or similar, industries and end-users as the Company


2016 COMPETITOR PEER GROUP
Cummins Inc.
Deere & Company

Sany Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.

Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.

Joy Global Inc.
Komatsu Ltd.
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Company Limited

Volvo AB


30 |

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    33


Back to Contents

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsCEO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND COMPENSATION

ROLE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IN DETERMINING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Board, excluding the CEO, all of whom are independent directors, annually conducts the CEO’s performance evaluation. Prior to the Board’s evaluation of the CEO’s performance and its approval of CEO compensation, the CommitteeCHRC makes a preliminary compensation recommendation to the Board based on the Committee’sits initial evaluation and performance review of the CEO. Additionally,The Board then makes its final determination for each NEO, the CEO presents a performance evaluation and makes compensation recommendations to the Committee.compensation.

On December 31, 2016, Mr. Oberhelman retired from the role of CEO and remained the Executive Chairman until his retirement on March 31, 2017. Mr. Umpleby was promoted to the position of CEO effective January 1, 2017. In early 2017, NEO performance was reviewed and discussed by the Compensation Committee with Mr. Umpleby. These performance evaluations factored into the compensation decisions made by the Committee and, in the case of Messrs. Oberhelman and Umpleby, by the independent members of the Board.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT

Each year, the CommitteeCHRC assesses the Company’s risk profile relative to the executive compensation program and confirms that the Company’sits compensation programs and policies do not create or encourage excessive risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company. Also, the CommitteeCHRC has concluded that the total compensation structure for senior leadership does not inappropriately emphasize short-term stock price performance at the expense of longer-term value creation. In particular, long-term incentive awards, as a significant portion of total compensation, and stocktarget ownership guidelines which NEOs are required to maintain pre- and post-retirement (6x base salary for our CEO and 3x base salary for each of the other NEOs), are structured to align management’s compensation with principles of risk management by maintaining a focus on the long termlong-term performance of the Company.

COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

TARGET OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The target ownership guidelines for the CEO is six times base salary and three times base salary for each of the other NEOs. NEOs have a five-year period from their first grant date after appointment to meet the target ownership guidelines. All NEOs are in compliance with these guidelines.

COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

NEOs receive a mix of fixed and variable compensation with a focus on long-term and performance-based components.

CEO

9%16%75%
SalaryAnnual Incentive*Long-term Incentive*

Average of Other NEOs

13%15%72%
SalaryAnnual Incentive*Long-term Incentive*

* At targetcomponents:

BASE SALARY

Base salary is the only fixed component of NEO compensation. The CommitteeCHRC targets the base salary midpointsalaries at the size-adjusted median level of the peer group. Each NEO’s base salary is determined by the individual’s level of responsibility and historic performance with reference to the market median. AnnualBase salary increases, if any, are based on achievement of individual and Company objectives,contributions to Caterpillar’s performance and culture, leadership accomplishments and a comparison to those in comparable positions at peer companies.

Mr. Oberhelman’s base salary had not increased since 2012 and remained in line with the median base salary of CEOs in the Company’s 2016 compensation peer group. Additionally, there were no changes to salary levels for any of the NEOs in 2016. Upon his promotion to the position of CEO,In 2019, Mr. Umpleby’s 2017 salary was set at $1.2increased from $1.5 million which

2017 Proxy Statement

 |31




Tableto $1.6 million in recognition of Contents

is belowhis performance and to further align his target compensation with the peer group median.

In setting2019, Mr. Umpleby’s baseBonfield’s salary was increased from $800,000 to $832,000 to align with the Board took into consideration several factors including market data of other recently appointed CEOs relative to peer group medians. Other NEOs’ base salariesaremedian. Salary adjustments were made effective April 1, 2019, for all NEOs and were set at or below the peer group median primarily duemedian.

NEO BASE SALARY

Name

2019

Umpleby

$1,600,000

Bonfield

$832,000

Ainsworth

$740,100

DeLange

$767,400

Johnson

$820,500

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    34


Back to the relatively recent promotions of some of these individuals to their current roles.Contents

ANNUAL INCENTIVE

20162019 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN

The Company’s AIPAnnual Incentive Plan (AIP) is designed to provide each NEO with the opportunity to earn an annual cash payout based on the short-term performance of the Company and each NEO’s respective businesses. The AIP places the majoritya significant percentage of each NEO’s target annual cash compensation at risk and aligns the interests of executives and shareholders.

The 2016 AIP design provided that an incentive pool would be funded based on the Company’s profit after taxes, with actual payouts based on achieving financial and operational performance measures that were established by the Committee in February 2016. Also, beginningBeginning in 2016, the CommitteeCHRC modified the AIP design to more closely align pay outcomes with business performance by annually comparing the Company’s annual forecasted operating profitEnterprise Operating Profit to the prior year’s actual operating profit. Based on thisEnterprise Operating Profit. The comparison the Committee annually determinesis conducted to determine whether the current year will be an “up year” (improved performance) or “down year” (weaker performance) versus the prior year’s actual operating profitEnterprise Operating Profit results. Beginning in 2019, the AIP design also included a Strategic Objectives Modifier which allows the CHRC to adjust the AIP payment by +/-20% based on the NEO’s contributions to strategic business objectives. All NEOs participated in AIP, and Mr. Ainsworth also participated in the Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) for the portion of the year prior to his appointment to Group President.

“Up Year”

If the operating profit forecast isabovethe prior year’s actual operating profit results

Threshold performancelevel will be set at no less than87 percent of the operating profit target.


Business
Plan

The payout for achievement of the maximum performance level will becapped at 150 percent of the target award opportunity, down from 200 percent in prior years.

Achievement of the target level operating profit performance goal will result in a payout of100 percent of the target award opportunity.

Performance at threshold will result in a payout of50 percent of the target award opportunity for the year.

Performance below threshold will result innoannual incentive payout under the program with respect to this measure.





“Down Year”

If the operating profit forecast isbelowthe prior year’s actual operating profit results, target incentive award opportunity for each NEO will be reduced in proportion to the decline in the operating profit

Threshold performance level will be set at no less than87 percent of the operating profit target.


Business
Plan

In a “down year,” there will beno upside opportunity above the target level.

Performance at threshold will result in a payout of50 percentof thereduced target award opportunity for the year.

Performance below threshold will result inno annual incentive payout under the program with respect to this measure.







In addition to operating profit performance, a portion of each NEO’s annual incentive will be based on operationalperformance measures related to their responsibilities, such as cost reduction, machine PINS (market position), aftermarket parts sales, Financial Products Division Return on Equity (FPD ROE) and inventory performance, all of which are subject to the same design above.

32 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents2019 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN DESIGN

Step 1: Determine “Up/Down Year”

Step 2: AIP Calculation

2019 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND RESULTS

In addition to Enterprise Operating Profit performance, a portion of each NEO’s annual incentive was based on Operating Profit After Capital Charge (OPACC) and Services Revenues, all of which were subject to the same design above. Consistent with this design process, after reviewing the Company’s 20162019 business plan, the CommitteeCHRC determined that 20162019 would be a “downan “up year,” as operating profitEnterprise Operating Profit was forecasted to be 20.9% below 2015 actual operating profit.above 2018. As a result, each NEO’sthere were no adjustments to the target AIPannual incentive opportunity was reduced by 20.9% andfor NEOs. For the AIP payout was cappedannual incentive, at target with no additional upside.

2016 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES

At its February 20162019 meeting, the CommitteeCHRC approved the performance measures described below and the strategic objectives to be used for determining actual payouts under the AIP. For all NEOs, thepayouts.

The largest portion of financial measures (ranging from 5066 percent to 8070 percent) of their 2016 AIPeach NEO’s 2019 annual incentive opportunity was based on Enterprise Operating Profit and the Operating Profit After Capital Charge (OPACC) of each NEO’sOPACC for their respective businesses.businesses, where applicable. The remaining portion of each NEO’s annual incentive award opportunity was determined basedby the Services Revenues metric for the enterprise or their respective businesses. Consistent with the Operating & Execution model, Services Revenues align the Company’s emphasis on the achievement of specific operational goals, such as cost reduction, Percent of Industry Sales (PINS), aftermarket parts sales, FPD ROE and inventory performance.services growth strategy with variable incentive opportunity.

When establishing the performance targets for 2016,2019, the CommitteeCHRC reviewed the Company’s business plan, and historical performance, management recommendations and feedback

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    35


Back to Contents

provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The CommitteeTargets were set the targets for each of the performance measures at levels that were designed to be reasonably achievable with strong management performance. Maximum performance levels were designed to be difficult to achieve in light of historical performance and the Company’s business forecast at the time the measures were approved. The business forecast includes consideration of market, economic and geopolitical factors. The performance measures were also weighted according to the Company’s business priorities and the responsibilities of each NEO. The chartCHRC identified certain objectives to further focus management’s efforts on company’s services growth strategy. These objectives, as well as the performance measures and weightings, were communicated to the NEOs at the beginning of the performance period.

The charts below summarizesand on the following page summarize the performance measures, weightings and results that the CHRC reviewed and approved for the 2016 AIP2019 annual incentive for each NEO.

In early 2017, the results for each performance measure noted above were converted into a performance factor and reviewed by the Committee. Each performance factor was multiplied by the respective weightings for each NEO to obtain a final weighted performance factor which was then used to determine actual incentive payments for each of the NEOs.DESCRIPTION OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2017 Proxy Statement

 |33PERFORMANCE MEASURE




Table of Contents

DEFINITION

Description of Performance Measures

PERFORMANCE
MEASURE
DEFINITION

RATIONALE

Enterprise Operating ProfitENTERPRISE OPERATING PROFIT

Enterprise Operating Profit measures the overall profitability of all of Caterpillar’s operations (including ME&T and Financial Products) before taxes, interest and other non-operating items. For AIP purposes, the

The CHRC approved Enterprise Operating Profit metric will be calculated as Caterpillar Consolidated Operating Profit excluding restructuring.

The Committee approved Operating Profit as the primary corporatea performance measure in order to incentincentivize management with respect to enhance the overall profitability of the Company. The CommitteeCHRC believes that Enterprise Operating Profit is an important corporate metric for shareholders to be able to assess the financial health of the Company and track its progress towards profit targets, particularly in a declining revenue environment.Company.

ENTERPRISE OPERATING PROFIT AFTER CAPITAL CHARGE (OPACC)

Enterprise Operating Profit After Capital Charge (OPACC)

measures how productively and efficiently Caterpillar is utilizing assets to generate shareholder value. For each reportable segment,AIP purposes, Enterprise OPACC is calculated as ME&T operating profit (excluding short-term incentive compensation expense and restructuring costs) less the capital charge. In 2016,

For Enterprise OPACC, the capital charge was calculated as theequals average monthlyquarterly ME&T net accountable assets multiplied by a pre-tax capital charge rate of 13 percent.

OPACC is designed to measure how productively and efficiently the Company’s assets are being utilized by examining the relationship between the value of the Company’s assets and the operating profit that those assets generate. An increase in OPACC means that the Company’s management is utilizing assets more efficiently to generate shareholder value, which the CommitteeCHRC views as key to Caterpillar’s long-term success.

SEGMENT OPERATING PROFIT AFTER CAPITAL CHARGE (OPACC)

For each segment, OPACC is calculated as segment profit less the capital charge. In 2019, the capital charge was calculated as the average monthly net accountable assets multiplied by a pre-tax capital charge rate of 13 percent.

OPACC is designed to measure how productively and efficiently the Company’s assets are being utilized by examining the relationship between the value of the Company’s assets and the operating profit that those assets generate. An increase in OPACC means that the Company’s management is utilizing assets more efficiently to generate shareholder value, which the CHRC views as key to Caterpillar’s long-term success.

Financial Products Division Return on Equity (FPD ROE)SERVICES REVENUES

FPD ROE is calculatedServices Revenues measure service-related revenues across Caterpillar including, but not limited to, revenues from aftermarket parts, financing and services provided by dividing the full year profit (after tax) by the average of the monthly accountable equity balances, excluding the impact of interest costs and equity changes associated with differences in planned vs. actual dividends. Dividends are payments of retained earnings from Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation and Caterpillar Financial Insurance Services, the Company’s wholly owned finance and insurance subsidiaries, to Caterpillar.

The Committee approved this measure to drive accountability for and performance of Caterpillar’s Financial Products Division, including appropriate oversight of risk management, portfolio quality and financial return expectations.

Percent of Industry Sales (PINS)

PINS capture dealer sales (including deliveries to dealer rental operations) as a percentage of industry sales.direct businesses. Due to the competitively sensitive nature of this measure, the threshold, target and result levels have all been indexed and reported as such.

The CommitteeCHRC approved PINSServices Revenues as a performancean important measure intended to further strengthen profitability realized by growth in order to incent improvements in the Company’s competitive position in the markets it serves.aftermarket parts and services.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    36


Back to Contents

2019 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND RESULTS

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    37


Back to Contents

2019 INCENTIVE PAYMENTS

In early 2020, the results for each performance measure noted above were converted into a performance factor, which was then multiplied by the respective weightings to determine the performance factor for each NEO. Then, the CHRC assessed the individual contributions of each NEO to the Strategic Objectives — the high-priority initiatives critical to deliver the enterprise strategy for long-term profitable growth — to determine the final factor and actual payments.

The following are the calculated 2019 cash incentive payments made to the NEOs:

Parts Sales

 

Target

Opportunity

 

Salary(1)

 

Final

Factor(2)

 

Payment(3)

 

Umpleby

175%

X

$

1,575,342

X

0.85

=

$

2,336,000

 

Bonfield

115%

X

$

824,110

X

0.77

=

$

730,000

 

Ainsworth

115%

X

$

736,043

X

0.88

=

$

744,000

 

De Lange

115%

X

$

761,877

X

0.94

=

$

820,000

 

Johnson

115%

X

$

809,034

X

0.90

=

$

840,000

 

Parts Sales is measured(1)   All payments were calculated using Caterpillar branded parts orders. This metric uses actual Caterpillar branded parts orders (at actual price levels), as reporteda daily weighted average salary

(2)   The final factor represents the calculated financial performance results adjusted by the Strategic Objectives Modifier; the Strategic Objectives Modifier applied to Mr. Umpleby was 10% and ranged from 0% to 15% for the Dealer Parts Orders Reporting System as compared to plan (at price levels when the plan was finalized). The metric is based on, and reported as, a percentage above or below plan. Dueother NEOs

(3)   Payments were rounded up to the competitively sensitive nature of this measure, the threshold, target and result levels have all been indexed and reported as such.

The Committee approved this measure because increasing Caterpillar branded parts sales is an important aspect of the corporate strategy. Aftermarket support is importantnearest thousand; may not recalculate exactly due to our customers and parts are a material component of that support. Aftermarket support is one of the main reasons why customers buy Caterpillar products and is a key differentiator in the global market.rounding

Cost Reduction

Cost reduction is calculated as 2015 ME&T total period costs less 2016 ME&T total period costs. Total period costs include the sum of ME&T period cost of sales, selling general & administrative (SG&A) expenses and Research & Development expenses and excludes restructuring charges, mark-to-market losses for pension and postemployment benefits and the year-over-year impact of changes in currency rates.

The Committee approved Cost Reduction as a performance measure in order to focus management on reducing costs during a period of significant and sustained revenue decline. The Committee believes that a focus on cost reduction is important for the current profitability of the Company as well as positioning the Company for improved profitability in the future.

Net Inventory Days on Hand

Total Enterprise Net Inventory Days on Hand for the sum of Production and Finished, Aftermarket Parts and Expanded Mining Parts, as reported in the Board reporting scorecard. Net Inventory Days on Hand will be calculated as 360 days divided by annualized rolling inventory turns, with inventory levels calculated net of customer advance payments.

During this period of sustained revenue decline, the Committee wanted a greater emphasis placed on improvement of inventory turns and the positive cash flow impact that such an improvement would drive across the enterprise.


34 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsLONG-TERM INCENTIVE

2016 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYMENTS

As described above, the 2016 AIP design provided that an incentive pool would be funded based on the Company’s profit after taxes, with actual payouts based on achieving the financial and operational performance measures established by the Committee in February 2016. Based on the Company’s 2016 reported profit after tax, the incentive pool did not fund, in part due to the impact of several significant items on profit (including restructuring costs, mark-to-market losses for pension and other postemployment benefits, a goodwill impairment charge and a state deferred tax valuation allowance). In order to more adequately reflect the Company’s core operating performance, the Committee, consistent with its authority, exercised its discretion to exclude these items and based on this adjusted profit after tax performance, approved the 2016 incentive payments as follows:

TARGET
OPPORTUNITY
“DOWN YEAR”
REDUCTION
REVISED
OPPORTUNITY
     SALARY          WEIGHTED
PERFORMANCE
FACTOR
          PAYOUT
Oberhelman175%    -    20.9%       =       138.4% X     $1,600,008X0.2339=$518,126
Halverson115%-20.9%=91.0%X$786,312X0.3000=$214,592
Charter115%-20.9%=91.0%X$729,768X0.4357 =$289,258
Umpleby115%-20.9%=91.0%X$825,636X0.2926=$219,773
Bozeman100%-20.9%=79.1%X$698,904X0.1000=$ 55,283

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE

20162019 DESIGN AND SIZING OF GRANT

Beginning in 2015, NEOIn 2019, the CHRC granted one-half of each NEO’s total long-term incentive (LTI) awards were comprised of two forms of equity – PRSUsvalue in Performance-based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs) and time-vestedone-half in non-qualified stock options (Options)(stock options). Consistent with its pay-for-performance philosophy andThe stock options vest equally in order to further align executives with shareholders, in 2016,one-third increments beginning on the Committee revised the weighting of these elements to deliver one-halffirst anniversary of the total LTI valuegrant date and expire after ten years from grant. Beginning with the 2018 equity grant, to align with market practice, Dividend Equivalent Units (DEUs) accrue on unvested PRSUs, but are settled only if the vesting requirements are met. The DEUs will settle in PRSUs and one-half in Options. additional shares, rounded to the nearest whole unit.

For the 20162019 grant, the CommitteeCHRC selected ROEReturn on Equity (ROE) as the PRSU performance measure as it aligns management with shareholdersshareholders’ interests by measuring and rewarding profitability relative to shareholders’ investment in the business. The ROE target level was designed to be reasonably achievable with strong management performance. The PRSUs cliff vest at the enduse of the 2016-2018 performance period based on average ROE overmetric and the full three-year period.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |35




Table of Contents

In February 2016, the Committee granted LTI awards that were initially sized at the 25th percentiledetermination of the benchmarked LTI valuesperformance hurdle for each performance cycle are calibrated with historical performance of the compensation and competitor peer groups (as well as S&P 500 Industrials more broadly) and are intended to reward for the achievement of sustained, long-term returns throughout the cycles in the Company’s compensation peer group.business. The Committee viewed this levelCHRC believes that a strong focus on ROE reinforces effective capital management along with the need to deliver returns above the cost of LTI sizing as appropriatecapital even in viewa highly cyclical and often challenging macro-economic operating environment, thus aligning leadership priorities with long-term shareholder interests. The Company’s ROE performance is annually reviewed including any one-time, non-operational or other special items that might impact the ROE result. Although certain items may significantly impact the Company’s reported financial results, they are not always indicative of the underlying operational performance of the Company or its management. To that end, in its evaluation of the Company’s 1, 3 and 5-year relative TSR and financial performance atROE results, the end of 2015. The Committee further adjustedCHRC uses its discretion to make adjustments to ROE to align compensation outcomes with the LTI awards to reflect the individualoperating performance of each NEO. the Company.

The Committee’sCHRC’s process for sizing and awarding LTI grant values for NEOs is as follows:

1

 1Benchmarking

Benchmark the median LTI value for the Company’s compensation peer group.

group

2

 2

Review and consideration ofconsider financial results; 1, 3 results: 1-,3-and5-yearTSR (vs (vs. the S&P 500 Industrials, Compensation Peer Group and Competitor Peer Group); operational performance; market conditionsconditions; and strategy execution.

execution

3

 3

Adjust award values toreflectindividualperformance including consistency of performance against goals, leadership contributions, time in role and otherrelevant factors.

factors

2015 – 2017 PRSUs

Beginning in 2015,

In February 2019, the Committee elected to award NEOs a portion of their LTI grant in the form of PRSUs, the vesting of which is determined over a three-year performance period. For the 2015 grant, one-third of the PRSUs are eligible to vest annually based on three annual 18% ROE hurdles. In addition, any PRSUs that do not vest based on the annual performance hurdle have the opportunity to vest based on the achievement of a three-year average ROE of 18% during the performance period. In setting this ROE hurdle, the Committee consideredCHRC reviewed the Company’s historical ROE1-, 3- and 5-year relative TSR and financial performance current business conditions and long-term business outlook which accounted for several financial and operational factors, including share repurchases.

In each of 2015 and 2016, the Company failed to achieve the 18% ROE performance hurdle and, accordingly, none of the PRSUs have vested to date. In light of these results during the first two years of the performance period, the Company believes that the likelihood of achieving a three-year average ROE of 18% or greater has substantially decreased. Beginning in 2016, the Committee adjusted the vesting terms of future PRSU grants to remove the annual vesting feature and instead to provide for cliff vesting of the entire grant at the end of 2018. As TSR captures volatility in share price which may not fully reflect the three-yearCompany’s underlying performance, other factors such as strategy execution and consistency of performance against goals are considered when determining LTI awards. Therefore, the LTI award for the CEO was at 50th percentile of the benchmarked LTI values of the Company’s compensation peer group and at or below 50th percentile for the other NEOs.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    38


Back to Contents

RELATIVE TSR PERFORMANCE (PERCENTILE RANKING VS. PEERS)

Performance Period

Compensation

Peer Group

Competitor

Peer Group

S&P 500

Industrials

1-Year

44th

83rd

37th

3-Year

89th

83rd

92nd

5-Year

72nd

83rd

52nd

Grant Sizing

50th Percentile

2017 – 2019 PERFORMANCE RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS (PRSUs)

For the 2017 – 2019 performance period, subjectadjustments were made to achieving the applicable ROE hurdle.

STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE PLAN (SPP)

Prior to 2015, NEOs received cash awards under the Company’s SPP, with the ultimate amounts determined based on a three-year performance cycle. The 2014 – 2016 SPP performance cycle was the final SPP cycle in which the current NEOs participated. For the 2014 – 2016 SPP cycle,the Committee established threshold, target and maximum payout levels as well as the two performance measures noted below. The Committee also established the target opportunityaccount for each NEO at the time the performance cycle was established.

36 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

2014 – 2016 PERFORMANCE PERIOD

The 2014-2016 performance period concluded in 2016 with a weighted-average performance factor well below target at 0.5551. The measures in this performance cycle were established in February 2014 and were comprised of two components –Earnings Per Share (EPS) andRelativeTSR (versus S&P Industrials). Performance with respect to both measures was well below target. In its evaluation of the 2014 – 2016 SPP performance measures and results, the Committee noted the impact of a goodwill impairment charge andcertain restructuring costs, the effect of an accounting principle change impacting the accounting for pension and other postemploymentbenefits. The Committee viewed the goodwill impairment charge as neither indicative of the Company’s underlying performance nor that of the NEOspost-employment benefits and acknowledged the impact of the accounting change was not contemplated when the 2014-2016 SPP was developed. Accordingly, the Committee excluded the impact of these expenses from EPS when evaluating and certifying the results below. Had the Committee not excluded these items, the overall payout factor for the 2014 – 2016 performance period would have been 0.4449, still substantially below target.

PERFORMANCE MEASURE     WEIGHTING     THRESHOLD
(30% PAYOUT)
     TARGET
(100% PAYOUT)
     MAXIMUM
(200% PAYOUT)
     RESULTS     PAYOUT
FACTOR
EPS175%$3.50$5.85 $7.02 $4.520.6028
Relative TSR vs. S&P Industrials25%25th Percentile 55th Percentile75th Percentile30th Percentile0.4120
 Overall Weighted Factor:0.5551

1Average of 2014-2016 actual EPS excluding restructuring and goodwill impairment. Results exclude the effect of an accounting principle change effective January 1, 2016 impacting the accounting for pension and other postemployment benefits.

2014 – 2016 PERFORMANCE PERIOD PAYMENTS

NEO       TARGET OPPORTUNITY              FINAL FACTOR              PAYOUT
Oberhelman$4,275,000X0.5551=$2,373,053
Halverson$1,150,000X 0.5551 =$638,365
Charter1 $953,435 X0.5551=$529,252
Umpleby$1,150,000X0.5551=$638,365
Bozeman$750,000X0.5551=$416,325

1 Mr. Charter was a Vice President during the first year of the performance period with a target opportunity of 90% of his base salary. For 2015 and 2016 Mr. Charter was a Group President with a target opportunity expressed as a flat dollar amount of $1,150,000. Mr. Charter’s blended target opportunity is reflected2017 tax reform legislation in the chart above.

OTHER COMPENSATION, BENEFITS AND CONSIDERATIONS

2017 CEO COMPENSATION

Jim Umpleby became Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2017. Douglas R. Oberhelman retiredU.S. Gains from the role of CEO on December 31, 2016 but remained the Executive Chairman until his retirement from the Company on March 31, 2017. Mr. Umpleby’s 2017 base salary, AIP target opportunity and LTI award valuedivestitures were set below that of Mr. Oberhelman in recognition of Mr. Oberhelman’s tenure in the role. The following chart shows Mr. Umpleby’s compensation effective January 1, 2017. Additionally, Mr. Umpleby will participate in generally the same perquisites and benefit plans as Mr. Oberhelman as described in more detail below. Mr. Oberhelman was paid his current salary until his retirement on March 31, 2017. Mr. Oberhelman is not eligible for AIP or LTI in 2017 as Executive Chairman.

COMPENSATION COMPONENT2017 VALUE
Salary$1,200,000
Annual Incentive150% of salary
Long-Term IncentiveApproximately 80% of the peer group median

2017 Proxy Statement

 |37




Table of Contents

DEPARTURE OF DAVID P. BOZEMAN

Mr. Bozeman served as an executive officer of the company through December 31, 2016. Mr. Bozeman’s position was eliminated in connection with the Company’s ongoing restructuring efforts, and in consideration for his service to the Company,excluded as well as a releasedeferred tax valuation allowance adjustments. In each case, the CHRC determined that these adjustments were an appropriate use of claimsits discretion and in favorthe best interests of the Company Mr. Bozeman was provided a severance payment of $2,300,000. In addition,and its shareholders.

For the Committee approved2017 grant, the accelerated, pro-rata vesting of 666 shares of restricted stock units and 96,359 stock options previously granted to Mr. Bozeman and a 12-month post-separation exercise period. The Committee also approved continued, pro-rata vesting of his outstanding 2015-2017 and 2016-2018 PRSUs with the level determinedcliff vested based on actual performance duringa three-year average adjusted ROE result of 40.9 percent, which exceeded the respective performance periods.

TRANSITION PAYMENT FOR ROBERT B. CHARTER

To assist with the continued costs associated with Mr. Charter’s relocation from Singapore to the United States and to help ensure that Mr. Charter remains in the same approximate financial position as he would have been absent his required international relocation, the Committee approved a transition paymentgoal of $500,000, which was paid to Mr. Charter in 2016. In approving this payment, the Committee considered the adverse income tax consequences to Mr. Charter, an Australian citizen, associated with his required relocation as well as the benefit programs in which Mr. Charter was previously eligible to participate as compared to13 percent. The chart below describes the Company’s other NEOs. The Committee also noted that providing this final payment was more cost effective toROE performance and results for the Company than placing Mr. Charter as an International Service Employee in Peoria, Illinois which customarily includes housing, mobility premiums, home leave and tax allowances.2017 – 2019 performance period:

2017-2019 PRSUs

OTHER COMPENSATION, BENEFITS AND CONSIDERATIONS

POST-TERMINATION AND CHANGE IN CONTROL BENEFITS

The Company’s change in control provisions are subject to a “double trigger,” and when both a change in control and involuntary termination of employment without cause occur, provide accelerated vesting and maximum payouts under the incentive plans, as described further below.

Except for customary provisions in employee benefit plans and as required by applicable law, the NEOs do not have any pre-existing executive severance packages or contracts; however, the CommitteeCHRC will consider the particular facts and circumstances of an NEO’s separation to determine whether payment of any severance or other benefit to such NEO is appropriate. Change in control benefits are provided under the Company’s long-term and annual incentive plans and represent customary provisions for these types of plans and have no direct correlation with other compensation decisions. There is no cash severance or other benefits for a termination related to change in control beyond what is provided for under the long-term and annual incentive plans.

The Company’s change in control provisions are subject to a “double trigger” and, when both a change in control and involuntary termination of employment without cause occur, provide accelerated vesting and target payouts under the incentive plans, as described further below.

In the event of a qualifying termination of employment following a change in control, target payouts are provided under the incentive plans.

All unvested stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance-based restricted stock units and restricted stock units vest immediately.

Stock options and stock appreciation rights remain exercisable over the normal life of the grant.

The annual incentive plan allows for the target award opportunity, prorated based on the individual’s time of employment from the beginning of the performance period through the later of: (1) the change in control or (2) termination of employment.

Additional information is disclosed in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section on page 48 of this proxy statement.

In the event of a qualifying termination of employment following a change in control, maximum payouts are provided under the long-term incentive plan and annual incentive plan. 2020 PROXY STATEMENT    39

The long-term plan allows for the maximum performance level to be paid under each open plan cycle of the long-term cash plan.


Back to Contents

All unvested stock options, stock appreciation rights, PRSUs and restricted stock units vest immediately.

Stock options and stock appreciation rights remain exercisable over the normal life of the grant.

The annual incentive plan allows for the target award opportunity, prorated based on the individual’s time of employment from the beginning of the performance period through the later of: (1) the change in control or (2) termination of employment.


38 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

RETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFITS

In addition to the annual and long-term components of compensation, NEOs participate in health and welfare benefit plans generally available to employees to provide competitive benefits.

The defined contribution and defined benefit retirement plans available to the NEOs are also available to many U.S. Caterpillar management and salaried employees. Under the defined benefit pension plans, the benefit is calculated based on years of service and final average monthly earnings. All of the NEOs participate in one or more of the U.S. retirement plans described in the following table, except as otherwise provided below.table:

PLAN TYPE          

Plan Type

TITLE

Title

DESCRIPTION

Description

PENSION

Retirement Income
PlanRETIREMENT INCOME PLAN (RIP)

Defined benefit pension plan under which benefit amounts are not offset for any Social Security benefits.calculated based on years of service and final average monthly earnings and offer annuity payments. On December 31, 2014, the Solar Turbines Incorporated Retirement Plan merged with and into RIP wasand is now a supplement to RIP as of January 1, 2015. As a result, all references herein to “Solar RP” shall refer to benefits accrued under the Solar Turbines Incorporated Retirement Plan supplement to RIP. Solar RP and RIP were closed to new entrants effective January 1, 2011. All U.S.-based NEOs, except Mr. Charter who participates in the Company’s Australian-based defined benefit pension plan, participate in this plan and, exceptBenefits were frozen for Mr. Bozeman, subject to the Company’s right to amend or terminate the plan, continue to earnmost participants; however, a group of “Sunset” participants accrued benefits under RIP until the earlier of their separation from service or December 31, 2019. Based on his hire date, Mr. Bozeman’s RIP benefit was frozen effectiveSunset participants were hired prior to January 1, 2011.2003, and were age 40 or more as of December 31, 2010. Mr. Umpleby earned benefits under RIP through December 31, 2019.

Supplemental Retirement
Plan (SERP)SOLAR MANAGERIAL RETIREMENT OBJECTIVE PLAN (MRO)

Non-qualified defined benefit pension plan that works in tandem with the Solar RP supplement to RIP. SERPMRO pays an additional benefit that would otherwise have been paid under Solar RP if cash incentive awards were taken into account under Solar RP. MRO also provides additional pension benefits if the NEO’sSolar RP benefit is limited due to thecertain compensation and annual benefit limits imposed on RIP by the tax code. SERP also pays a benefit that would otherwise have been paid under RIP but for (1) the NEO’s deferral of compensation under SDCP, SEIP or DEIP and (2) exclusions of lump sum discretionary awards and variable base pay from RIP earnings. As with RIP, SERP was closed to new entrants effective January 1, 2011. Subject to the Company’s right to amend or terminate the plan, all U.S.-based NEOs, except Messrs. Bozeman and Umpleby, continue to earn SERP benefits until the earlier of separation or December 31, 2019. Based on Mr. Bozeman’s hire date, his SERP benefit was frozen effective January 1, 2011. Mr. Umpleby participates in a Solar Turbines Incorporated sponsored non-qualified defined benefit pension plan, which is similar to SERP. Subject to the Company’s right to amend or terminate the plan, Mr. Umpleby continues to earnearned benefits until the earlier of separation orunder MRO through December 31, 2019.

SAVINGSCATERPILLAR 401(k) PLANS

Caterpillar 401(k)
Plans

All U.S.-based NEOs except for Mr. Bozeman, arewho continued to earn benefits in a pension plan were eligible to participate in thea Caterpillar 401(k) Savings Planplan under which the Company matchesmatched 50 percent of the first 6six percent of the NEO’s eligible pay contributed to the savings plan. Prior to his separation from the Company and based on his hire date, Mr. Bozeman participated401(k). All other U.S.-based NEOs participate in thea Caterpillar 401(k) Retirement Plan,plan under which the Company matches 100 percent of the first 6six percent of eligible pay contributed toby the retirement plan,participant, and the Company makes an annual non-elective contribution equal to 3%, 4%three percent, four percent or 5%five percent of eligible pay based on the employee’s age and years of service with the Company.

Supplemental Deferred
Compensation Plan
SUPPLEMENTAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (SDCP)

All U.S.-based NEOs who are eligible to participate in a Caterpillar 401(k) plan are eligible to participate in SDCP, which provides the opportunity to make deferrals of base salary in excess of the limits imposed on the 401(k) Savings Plan and the 401(k) Retirement Planplans by the Internal Revenue Code and to elect deferrals from the AIP and the SPP.STIP. Under the terms of SDCP, participants are eligible to earn matching contributions and annual non-elective contributions based on formulas applicable to them in the Caterpillar 401(k) plans.

Supplemental
SUPPLEMENTAL (SEIP) and Deferred
AND DEFERRED (DEIP) Employees’
Investment PlanEMPLOYEES’ INVESTMENT PLAN

All U.S.-based NEOs hired prior to March 25, 2007 were previously eligible to participate in SEIP and DEIP. These plans were closed in March 2007. Compensation deferred into SEIP and DEIP prior to January 1, 2005 remains in these plans.


2017 Proxy Statement

 |39

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    40


Back to Contents




Table of Contents

LIMITED PERQUISITES

The Company provides NEOs a limited number of perquisites that the CommitteeCHRC believes are reasonable and consistent with the overall compensation program and those commonly provided in the marketplace. The Committee annually reviews the levels of perquisites provided to the NEOs which include, among other things, home security systems and (in the case of the CEO) limited personal use of the Company aircraft and ground transportation. These perquisites are provided to attract and retain talented executive officers,intended to provide for adequatethe security and safety of our executives andas well as to allow the NEOs to devote additional time to devote to Caterpillar business. CostsPerquisites include executive physicals, financial planning, home and personal security and limited use of company aircraft and ground transportation. The costs associated with these perquisites are included in the “2016“2019 All Other Compensation Table” on page 42.Table.”

At the discretion of the Committee, certain benefits may be continued for the CEO upon retirement. On December 13, 2016, the Committee approved the following retirement benefits for Mr. Oberhelman effective April 1, 2017: (1) office space and related IT, administrative and travel agent support at the Company’s facility located in Edwards, Illinois; and (2) continued home security for a period not to exceed five years from the date of Mr. Oberhelman’s retirement.

CLAWBACK POLICY

Under the Company’s compensation clawback policy, the Board may require reimbursement of any bonus or incentive compensation awarded to an officer or cancel unvested restricted or deferred stock awards previously granted to the officer if all of the following apply:

The amount of the bonus, incentive compensation or stock award was calculated based on the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement;

The officer engaged in intentional misconduct that caused or partially caused the need for the restatement; and

The amount of the bonus, incentive compensation or stock award that would have been awarded to the officer had the financial results been properly reported would have been lower than the amount actually awarded.

The amount of the bonus, incentive compensation or stock award was calculated based on the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement.

The officer engaged in intentional misconduct that caused or partially caused the need for the restatement.

The amount of the bonus, incentive compensation or stock award that would have been awarded to the officer had the financial results been properly reported would have been lower than the amount actually awarded.

NO HEDGING OR PLEDGING

The Company’s insider trading policy prohibits directors, officers and employees from engaging in hedging transactions, holding Company securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Company securities.

TAX IMPLICATIONS: DEDUCTIBILITY OF NEO COMPENSATION

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, generally NEO compensation over $1.0$1 million for any year is not deductible for United States income tax purposes. However,Historically, there was an exemption from this $1 million deduction limit for compensation payments that qualified as “performance-based” under applicable IRS regulations. With the enactment of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the performance-based compensation is exempt from the deduction limit if certain requirements are met. One of the goals of the Committee is to structure compensation to take advantage of this exemption was eliminated under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, except with respect to certain grandfathered arrangements. The CHRC believes that it must maintain flexibility in its approach to executive compensation in order to structure a program that it considers to be the extent practicable. However,most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining the Committee may elect to provideCompany’s key executives, and therefore, the deductibility of compensation outside those requirementsis one of several factors considered when necessary to achieve itsmaking executive compensation objectives.decisions.

COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (CHRC) has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A) included in this proxy statement with management and is satisfied that the CD&A fairly and completely represents the philosophy, intent and actions of the CommitteeCHRC with regard to executivecompensation.executive compensation. Based on such review and discussion, we recommend to the Board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.

By the members of the Compensation Committee consisting of:and Human Resources Committee:

Miles D. White (Chairman)

Debra L. Reed-Klages

Rayford Wilkins, Jr.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    41


Back to Contents

2019SUMMARYCOMPENSATIONTABLE

Name and

Principal Position

Year

 

Salary

 

Bonus

 

Stock

Awards(1)

 

Option

Awards(2)

Non-equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation(3)

Change in

Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(4)

All Other

Compensation(5)

 

Total

Compensation

Total

Without

Change in

Pension

Value(6)

D. James Umpleby III
Chairman & CEO

2019

 $

1,575,000

 $

 $

5,450,022

  $

6,704,943

  $

2,336,000

  $

18,161,210

  $

291,954

  $

34,519,129

  $

16,357,919

2018

$

1,425,000

$

$

6,499,973

$

8,448,354

$

4,742,000

$

5,891,465

$

282,721

$

27,289,513

$

21,398,048

 

2017

$

1,200,000

$

1,070,000

$

3,288,528

$

5,361,394

$

2,430,000

$

$

685,287

$

14,035,209

$

14,035,209

Andrew R. J. Bonfield
CFO

2019

$

824,000

$

$

1,799,934

$

2,214,477

$

730,000

$

$

479,732

$

6,048,143

$

6,048,143

2018

$

266,667

$

800,000

$

4,450,025

$

993,465

$

585,000

$

$

86,030

$

7,181,187

$

7,181,187

Denise C. Johnson
Group President

2019

$

808,875

$

$

1,799,934

$

2,214,477

$

840,000

$

$

243,684

$

5,906,970

$

5,906,970

2018

$

763,002

$

$

2,000,073

$

2,599,472

$

1,677,000

$

$

157,034

$

7,196,581

$

7,196,581

William P. Ainsworth
Group President

2019

$

754,250

$

$

1,799,934

$

2,214,477

$

744,000

$

$

30,499

$

5,543,160

$

5,543,160

Bob De Lange
Group President

2019

$

761,800

$

$

1,600,018

$

1,968,433

$

820,000

$

$

281,928

$

5,432,179

$

5,432,179

2018

$

725,001

$

$

2,149,984

$

2,794,444

$

1,180,000

$

$

453,190

$

7,302,619

$

7,302,619

2017

$

664,221

$

$

1,224,639

$

1,996,648

$

1,381,917

$

$

2,455,278

$

7,722,703

$

7,722,703

(1)

The amounts reported in this column represent PRSUs granted in 2019 under the Caterpillar Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and are valued based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, assuming the highest level of performance is achieved for the PRSUs, which at the time of grant reflected the probable level of achievement. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 3 “Stock-based compensation” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2020.

(2)

The amounts reported in this column represent non-qualified stock options granted under the LTIP that are valued based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 3 “Stock-based compensation” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2020.

(3)

The amounts in this column reflect the AIP payments for 2019 for all NEOs except Mr. Ainsworth whose incentive plan compensation consisted of both AIP and STIP.

(4)

Because no “preferred” or “above market” earnings on compensation deferred into SDCP, SEIP, and/or DEIP are received, the amount shown represents only the change between the actuarial present value of each NEO’s total accumulated pension benefit between December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019. The amount reported for Mr. Umpleby assumes the pension benefit is payable at his earliest unreduced retirement age. Upon his initial hire with Solar Turbines Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar, on July 7, 1980, Mr. Umpleby became eligible to participate in the Solar Turbines Inc. Retirement Plan and the Solar Turbines Incorporated Managerial Retirement Objective Plan (Solar MRO). The Solar Turbines Inc. Retirement Plan was merged into the Retirement Income Plan (RIP) as of January 1, 2015; however, all benefit and eligibility provisions of the plan remain unchanged in the merger as described in Supplement O (Solar RP) to RIP. Mr. Umpleby’s change in pension value was primarily due to an increase in his annual pensionable earnings (which include base and annual cash incentive pay) resulting from an additional year of compensation as CEO. The pension benefit is based on the average of the highest consecutive 36 months of pensionable earnings in the 10-year period prior to the determination date of December 31, 2019, the same date on which the Solar RP and Solar MRO were frozen for all participating employees, including Mr. Umpleby. During Mr. Umpleby’s tenure as CEO, there have been no changes made to the plans’ benefit formula provisions (other than to freeze benefit accruals) and Mr. Umpleby’s benefit is determined in the same manner as any similarly situated management employee with a similar service and compensation history.

(5)

All Other Compensation detail for 2019 is shown in a separate table appearing on the next page.

(6)

To demonstrate how year-over-year changes in pension value impact total compensation, as determined under SEC rules, we have included this column to show total compensation without pension value changes. The amounts reported in this column are calculated by subtracting the change in pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column, from the amounts reported in the Total Compensation column. The amounts reported in this column differ from, and are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the Total Compensation column.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    42


Back to Contents

2019ALLOTHERCOMPENSATIONTABLE

Name

Company

Contributions

401(k)

Company

Contributions

SDCP

Corporate

Aircraft/

Transportation(1)

Personal

Security(2)

 

Other(3)

 

Total All

Other

Compensation

D. James Umpleby III

$

             7,500

$

181,110

$

62,494

$

23,355

$

17,495

$

291,954

Andrew R. J. Bonfield

$

           14,333

$

41,440

$

2,235

$

4,764

$

416,960

$

479,732

Denise C. Johnson

$

           27,441

$

191,242

$

6,780

$

726

$

17,495

$

243,684

William P. Ainsworth

$

           25,454

$

$

3,007

$

$

2,038

$

30,499

Bob De Lange

$

           45,343

$

177,430

$

2,986

$

1,426

$

54,743

$

281,928

(1)

Values in this column, except as below, include the value of personal aircraft usage based on Caterpillar’s incremental cost per flight hour, including the weighted average variable operating cost of fuel, oil, aircraft maintenance, landing and parking fees, related ground transportation, catering and other smaller variable costs. Mr. Umpleby and the Company have a time-sharing lease agreement, pursuant to which certain costs associated with personal flights are reimbursed by Mr. Umpleby to the Company in accordance with the agreement. A car allowance for Mr. Ainsworth (which ceased upon his appointment to Group President) of $2,769 and the cost of executive transportation provided to Mr. Umpleby of $2,435, Mr. Bonfield of $2,235, Ms. Johnson of $6,780 and Mr. De Lange of $2,770 are included in the totals.

(2)

Amounts reported for personal security represent the cost provided by outside security providers for installation, monitoring and maintenance of home security and smart home services and for reputation and identity theft protection. The incremental cost associated with the security services is determined based upon the amounts paid to these outside service providers.

(3)

Values in this column, except as below, include the cost for executive physicals and financial planning services. The incremental cost associated with these services is determined based upon the amounts paid to the approved service providers. The amount reported for Mr. Bonfield also includes relocation expenses of $412,965. Mr. De Lange was previously an International Service Employee (ISE). The amount reported includes payments made in 2019 related to Mr. De Lange’s previous ISE service including Company paid taxes of $36,056 and tax preparation fees of $2,693.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    43


Back to Contents

GRANTSOFPLAN-BASEDAWARDSIN2019

Name

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards(1)

 

Estimated

Future

Payouts

Under Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards(2)

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options(3)

(#)

Exercise or

Base Price

of Option

Awards

($/Share)

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

Awards ($)(4)

Grant

Date

 

Threshold

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

 

Target

(#)

D. James Umpleby III

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

39,393

$

$

5,450,022

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

163,615

$

138.35

$

6,704,943

AIP

(5)

$

1,378,425

$

2,756,849

$

5,513,698

 

$

$

Andrew R. J. Bonfield

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

13,010

$

$

1,799,934

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

54,038

$

138.35

$

2,214,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AIP

(5)

$

473,863

$

947,726

$

1,895,452

 

$

$

Denise C. Johnson

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

13,010

$

$

1,799,934

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

54,038

$

138.35

$

2,214,477

AIP

(5)

$

465,195

$

930,389

$

1,860,778

 

$

$

William P. Ainsworth

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

13,010

$

$

1,799,934

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

54,038

$

138.35

$

2,214,477

AIP/STIP

(5)

$

414,556

$

829,112

$

1,658,224

 

$

$

Bob De Lange

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

11,565

$

$

1,600,018

3/4/2019

 

 

 

 

 

48,034

$

138.35

$

1,968,433

AIP

(5)

$

438,080

$

876,159

$

1,752,318

 

$

$

(1)

Miles D. White
(Chairman)The amounts reported represent estimated potential awards under the 2019 AIP for all NEOs other than Mr. Ainsworth who also participated in the 2019 STIP for the portion of the year prior to his appointment to Group President.

(2)

David L. CalhounThe amounts reported in this column represent estimated potential awards under the LTIP. PRSUs were granted on March 4, 2019 under the LTIP for the 2019-2021 performance period. PRSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period subject to the Company’s achievement of an average ROE performance hurdle during that period. There is no threshold or maximum payout opportunity with respect to these PRSUs.

(3)

Jesse J. Greene, Jr.Amounts reported represent stock options granted under the LTIP. The exercise price for all stock options granted to the NEOs is the closing price of Caterpillar stock on the grant date. All stock options granted to the NEOs will vest in one-third increments on March 4, 2020, March 4, 2021 and March 4, 2022.

(4)

Debra L. ReedThe amounts shown do not reflect realized compensation by the NEO. As reported in this column, the value of PRSUs granted in 2019 under the LTIP are based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, assuming the highest level of performance is achieved for the PRSUs, which at the time of the grant reflected the probable level of achievement.

(5)

The 2019 AIP and STIP estimates shown are based upon each executive’s base salary for 2019. The actual payout was based on the achievement of corporate and business unit performance metrics and the Strategic Objectives Modifier. Please refer to page 36 of the CD&A for a detailed explanation of the various performance metrics. Payments under AIP are limited by a plan cap set at $15 million. The cash payouts for the 2019 plan year are included in the column “Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation” of the “2019 Summary Compensation Table.”


40 |

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    44


Back to Contents

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

In years before 2015, long-term incentive compensation design was based on two components – a rolling three-year cash plan and market based stock option grants. Beginning in 2015, the Committee revised the long-term incentive plan, eliminating the cash portion and replacing it with PRSUs.

While the Committee believes PRSUs are better aligned with shareholder interests going forward, NEOs’ pay in 2016 includes results of the legacy 2014-2016 performance-based cash plan as well as PRSUs granted in 2016. SEC executivecompensation disclosure rules require the grant date fair value of PRSUs to be reported in the year of grant in the Stock Awards column below, rather than after the completion of the three-year performance period that commenced in 2016. Because the payment for the 2014-2016 performance-based cash plan is also included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column, the Summary Compensation Table in effect double counts the NEOs’ long-term incentive compensation for 2016. This is the final year for this legacy performance-based cash plan for the NEOs listed below.

2016 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION

 

YEAR

 

SALARY

 

BONUS1

 

STOCK
AWARDS
2

 

OPTION
AWARDS
3

 

NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION
4

 

CHANGE IN
PENSION VALUE
AND
NONQUALIFIED
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
EARNINGS5

 

ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION
6

 

SEC TOTAL

SEC TOTAL
WITHOUT
CHANGE IN
PENSION
VALUE7

Douglas R. Oberhelman 2016   $1,600,008   $   $3,577,816   $7,218,819         $2,891,179               $3,658                 $181,034           $15,472,514   $15,468,856
Chairman & CEO 2015 $1,600,008 $ $3,031,479 $9,959,588  $822,804   $2,091,814   $398,144  $17,903,837$15,812,023
  2014 $1,600,008 $ $ $8,377,481  $4,913,288   $1,998,805   $241,866  $17,131,448$15,132,643
Bradley M. Halverson 2016 $786,312 $ $1,080,269 $2,179,625  $852,957   $231,289   $96,250  $5,226,702$4,995,413
Group President & CFO 2015 $786,312 $ $1,127,963 $3,705,673  $244,440   $2,293,173   $90,933  $8,248,494$5,955,321
  2014 $755,202 $ $ $2,392,921  $1,501,537   $595,014   $42,294  $5,286,968$4,691,954
Robert B. Charter 2016 $729,768 $500,000 $984,692 $1,986,744  $818,510   $189,3278  $247,311  $5,456,352$5,267,025
Group President 2015 $729,768 $300,000 $1,046,232 $3,437,148  $190,994   $845,918   $541,566  $7,091,626$6,245,708
Jim Umpleby 2016 $825,636 $ $1,166,657 $2,353,971  $858,138   $62,688   $27,097  $5,294,187$5,231,499
Group President 2015 $815,805 $ $1,264,698 $4,154,987  $247,726   $2,582,073   $83,085  $9,148,374$6,566,301
  2014 $755,202 $ $ $2,527,089  $1,847,136   $1,484,122   $57,772  $6,671,321$5,187,199
David P. Bozeman 2016 $698,904 $ $1,412,3629$2,324,92310 $471,608   $   $2,393,163  $7,300,960$7,300,960
Senior Vice President                                  

1 The amount reported for 2016 represents a lump sum discretionary bonus authorized by the Committee relating to Mr. Charter’s required relocation from Singapore to the United States.
2 The amounts reported in this column represent PRSUs granted in 2016 under the Caterpillar Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and are valued based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, assuming the highest level of performance is achieved for the PRSUs, which at the time of grant reflected the probable level of achievement. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 2 “Stock-based compensation” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 15, 2017.
3 The amounts reported in this column represent Non-qualified Stock Options (NQs) granted under the LTIP that are valued based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 2 “Stock-based compensation” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 15, 2017.
4 The amounts in this column reflect the following cash annual incentive payments for 2016: Mr. Oberhelman $518,126; Mr. Halverson $214,592; Mr. Charter $289,258; Mr. Umpleby $219,773; Mr. Bozeman $55,283 ; and the following cash incentive payments for the 2014-2016 performance cycle: Mr. Oberhelman $2,373,053; Mr. Halverson $638,365; Mr. Charter $529,252; Mr. Umpleby $638,365; and Mr. Bozeman $416,325.
5 Because NEOs do not receive “preferred” or “above market” earnings on compensation deferred into SDCP, SEIP and/or DEIP, the amount shown represents only the change between the actuarial present value of each NEO’s total accumulated pension benefit between December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016. The amount assumes the pension benefit is payable at each NEO’s earliest unreduced retirement age based upon the NEO’s current pensionable earnings.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |41




Table of Contents

6 All Other Compensation for 2016 is detailed in a separate table appearing below.
7 To demonstrate how year over year changes in pension value impact total compensation, as determined under SEC rules, we have included this column to show total compensation without pension value changes. The amounts reported in this column are calculated by subtracting the change in pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column, from the amounts reported in the SEC Total column. The amounts reported in this column differ from, and are not a substitute for, the amounts reported in the SEC Total column.
8 The amount reported for Mr. Charter has been converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2016 (1 Australian dollar = 0.72355 U.S. dollar).
9 For Mr. Bozeman this amount also includes the incremental fair value associated with modifications to his outstanding restricted stock unit and performance-based restricted stock unit awards in 2016 totaling $732,778. As noted in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, in 2016, the vesting terms of certain equity awards were modified in connection with his separation from the Company.
10 For Mr. Bozeman this amount also includes the incremental fair value associated with modifications to his outstanding stock option awards in 2016 totaling $953,725. As noted in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, in 2016, the vesting terms of certain equity awards were modified in connection with his separation from the Company.

2016 ALL OTHER COMPENSATION TABLE

NAME

MATCHING
CONTRIBUTIONS
401(K)

   

MATCHING
CONTRIBUTIONS
SDCP

    CORPORATE
AIRCRAFT/
TRANSPORTATION
1
   HOME
SECURITY2
   OTHER   TOTAL ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION
Douglas R. Oberhelman         $7,950                     $40,050                    $87,125                $45,909    $       $181,034       
Bradley M. Halverson$7,950$15,639$8,742$63,919$$96,250
Robert B. Charter$7,950$13,943$9,652$2,353$213,4133$247,311
Jim Umpleby$7,872$16,819$$2,406$$27,097
David P. Bozeman$15,817$76,803$$543$2,300,0004$2,393,163

1 The value of personal aircraft usage reported above is based on Caterpillar’s incremental cost per flight hour, including the weighted average variable operating cost of fuel, oil, aircraft maintenance, landing and parking fees, related ground transportation, catering and other smaller variable costs. Mr. Oberhelman and the Company have a time-sharing lease agreement, pursuant to which certain costs associated with personal flights are reimbursed by Mr. Oberhelman to the Company in accordance with the agreement.
2 Amounts reported for home security represent the cost provided by an outside security provider for hardware and monitoring service. The incremental cost associated with the home security services is determined based upon the amounts paid to the outside service provider.
3 Mr. Charter was previously an International Service Employee (ISE) based in Singapore. The amount reported represents Company paid taxes pursuant to the Company’s tax equalization policy for ISEs. This policy is intended to ensure the Company’s ISEs are in the same approximate financial position as they would have been if they lived in their home country during the time of their international service.
4 The amount reported represents a severance payment authorized by the Committee in connection with Mr. Bozeman’s separation from service from the Company.

42 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2016

 
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS1

ESTIMATED
FUTURE
PAYOUTS
UNDER
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
AWARDS
2

ALL OTHER
STOCK
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK OR
UNITS
(#)

ALL OTHER
OPTION AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
OPTIONS3
(#)

   

EXERCISE OR
BASE PRICE
OF OPTION
AWARDS
($/SHARE)
 

GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE
OF STOCK
AND
OPTION
AWARDS ($)4

NAME

   

GRANT
DATE

THRESHOLD
($)

TARGET
($)

MAXIMUM
($)

TARGET
(#)

Douglas R. Oberhelman03/07/2016            55,290                $          $3,577,816
03/07/2016349,749$74.77$7,218,819

AIP5

$

1,107,406$2,214,811$2,214,811$$
Bradley M. Halverson03/07/201616,694$$1,080,269
03/07/2016105,602$74.77$2,179,625
AIP5

$

357,634$715,269$715,269$$
Robert B. Charter03/07/201615,217$$984,692
 03/07/201696,257$74.77$1,986,744
AIP5

$

331,917$663,833$663,833$$
Jim Umpleby03/07/201618,029$$1,166,657
03/07/2016114,049$74.77$2,353,971
AIP5

$

371,049$742,097$742,097$$
David P. Bozeman03/07/201610,502$$679,584
03/07/201666,434$74.77$1,371,198
10,502$732,7786
66,434$953,7257
AIP5

$

138,208$276,417$276,417$$

1 The amounts reported in this column represent estimated potential awards under the 2016 AIP. There was no maximum payout opportunity as the 2016 AIP design capped potential payments at target.
2 The amounts reported in this column represent estimated potential awards under the LTIP. PRSUs were granted on March 7, 2016 under the LTIP for the 2016-2018 performance period. PRSUs vest over a three-year performance period with 100 percent of the grant to vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the Company’s achievement of an average ROE performance hurdle during the three-year performance period. The amounts reported in the target column reflect the number of PRSUs that would vest if the Company’s average ROE performance during the three-year performance period meets or exceeds the ROE performance hurdle. There is no threshold or maximum payout opportunity with respect to these PRSUs.
3Amounts reported represent stock options granted under the LTIP. The exercise price for all stock options granted to the NEOs is the closing price of Caterpillar stock on the grant date ($74.77). All stock options granted to the NEOs will vest in one-third increments on each of the first through third year anniversaries of the date of grant. The actual realizable value of the options will depend on the fair market value of Caterpillar stock at the time of exercise.
4 The amounts shown do not reflect realized compensation by the NEO. As reported in this column, the value of PRSUs granted in 2016 under the LTIP are based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, assuming the highest level of performance is achieved for the PRSUs, which at the time of the grant reflected the probable level of achievement.
5 The 2016 AIP estimates are based upon each executive’s base salary for 2016. The actual payout was based on the achievement of corporate and business unit performance metrics. Please refer to page 33 of the CD&A for a detailed explanation of the various performance metrics. For the 2016 AIP, the threshold amount was earned if at least 50 percent of the targeted performance level was achieved. The target amount was earned if at least 100 percent or greater of the targeted performance level was achieved, with a plan cap set at $15 million. The cash payouts for the 2016 plan year are included in the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” of the “2016 Summary Compensation Table.”
6 This amount represents the value of the modification to outstanding restricted stock unit and performance-based restricted stock unit awards in connection with Mr. Bozeman’s separation from the Company and does not reflect a new equity grant.
7 This amount represents the value of the modification to outstanding stock options in connection with Mr. Bozeman’s separation from the Company and does not reflect a new equity grant.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |43




Table of Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 20162019 FISCAL YEAR END

Name

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Number of Securities Underlying

Unexercised SARs/Options

SAR / Option

Exercise Price

SAR / Option

Expiration

Date(1)

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

have not

Vested(2)

Market Value

of Shares or Units

of  Stock that have

not Vested(3)

Equity Incentive Plan Awards:

Grant Date

Exercisable

Unexercisable

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or other

Rights that

have not

Vested(4)

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or other Rights

that have not

Vested(5)

D. James Umpleby III

03/05/2012

21,416

$

110.09

03/05/2022

 

$

 

$

03/04/2013

79,976

$

89.75

03/04/2023

 

$

 

$

03/03/2014

85,606

$

96.31

03/03/2024

 

$

 

$

03/02/2015

172,621

$

83.00

03/02/2025

 

$

 

$

03/07/2016

114,049

$

74.77

03/07/2026

 

$

 

$

03/06/2017

$

 

$

37,895

(6)

$

5,596,334

03/06/2017

142,914

71,456

$

95.66

03/06/2027

 

$

 

$

03/05/2018

$

 

$

45,050

(7)

$

6,652,984

03/05/2018

60,982

121,962

$

151.12

03/05/2028

 

$

 

$

03/04/2019

$

 

$

40,304

(7)

$

5,952,095

03/04/2019

163,615

$

138.35

03/04/2029

 

$

 

$

Andrew R. J. Bonfield

09/07/2018

$

 

13,567

$

2,003,575

 

$

09/07/2018

$

 

$

5,500

(7)

$

812,240

09/07/2018

7,693

15,384

$

141.32

03/05/2028

 

$

 

$

03/04/2019

$

 

$

13,311

(7)

$

1,965,768

03/04/2019

54,038

$

138.35

03/04/2029

 

$

 

$

Denise C. Johnson

03/06/2017

$

 

$

18,294

(6)

$

2,701,658

03/06/2017

34,496

$

95.66

03/06/2027

 

$

 

$

03/05/2018

$

 

$

13,862

(7)

$

2,047,140

03/05/2018

18,764

37,526

$

151.12

03/05/2028

 

$

 

$

03/04/2019

$

 

$

13,311

(7)

$

1,965,768

03/04/2019

54,038

$

138.35

03/04/2029

 

$

 

$

William P. Ainsworth

03/02/2015

15,199

$

83.00

03/02/2025

 

$

 

$

05/01/2015

$

 

125

$

18,460

 

$

03/07/2016

30,694

$

74.77

03/07/2026

 

$

 

$

03/06/2017

$

 

$

12,283

(6)

$

1,813,953

03/06/2017

46,324

23,162

$

95.66

03/06/2027

 

$

 

$

03/05/2018

$

 

$

8,317

(7)

$

1,228,255

03/05/2018

11,258

22,516

$

151.12

03/05/2028

 

$

 

$

03/04/2019

$

 

$

13,311

(7)

$

1,965,768

03/04/2019

54,038

$

138.35

03/04/2029

 

$

 

$

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    45

OPTION AWARDS

STOCK AWARDS

NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED
SARs/OPTIONS

SAR /
OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE

SAR /
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
1

NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS
OF STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED
2

MARKET
VALUE
OF SHARES
OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED
3

EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:

NAME

GRANT
DATE

EXERCISABLE

UNEXERCISABLE

NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
4

MARKET OR
PAYOUT VALUE OF
UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS OR
OTHER RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
5

Douglas R. Oberhelman   03/03/2008   60,000         $73.20      03/03/2018          $                    $          
03/02/2009166,252$22.1703/02/2019$$
03/01/2010272,282$57.8503/01/2020$$
03/07/2011226,224$102.1303/07/2021$$
03/05/2012275,000$110.0903/05/2022$$
03/04/2013281,090$89.7503/04/2023$$
03/03/2014283,790$96.3103/03/2024$$
02/27/2015$$39,1316$3,629,009
03/02/2015137,926275,850$83.0003/02/2025$$
03/07/2016$$55,2907$5,127,595
03/07/2016349,749$74.7703/07/2026$$
Bradley M. Halverson03/07/201122,696$102.1303/07/2021$$
03/05/201221,416$110.0903/05/2022$$
03/04/201379,976$89.7503/04/2023$$
03/03/201481,061$96.3103/03/2024$$
02/27/2015$$14,5606$1,350,294
 03/02/201551,318102,636$83.0003/02/2025$$
03/07/2016$$16,6947$1,548,202
03/07/2016105,602$74.7703/07/2026$$
$8328$77,160$
Robert B. Charter03/07/201123,379$102.1303/07/2021$$
03/05/201220,534$110.0903/05/2022$$
03/04/201325,369$89.7503/04/2023$$
03/03/201427,045$96.3103/03/2024$$
02/27/2015$$13,5056$1,252,454
03/02/201547,60095,198$83.0003/02/2025$$
03/07/2016$$15,2177$1,411,225
03/07/201696,257$74.7703/07/2026$$
Jim Umpleby03/01/20106,781$57.8503/01/2020$$
03/07/201122,696$102.1303/07/2021$$
03/05/201221,416$110.0903/05/2022$$
03/04/201379,976$89.7503/04/2023$$
03/03/201485,606$96.3103/03/2024$$
02/27/2015$$16,3256$1,513,981
03/02/201557,541115,080$83.0003/02/2025$$
03/07/2016$ $18,0297$1,672,009
03/07/2016114,049$74.7703/07/2026$$
$8328$77,160$


Back to Contents

44 |Name

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Number of Securities Underlying

Unexercised SARs/Options

2017 Proxy Statement

SAR / Option

Exercise Price

SAR / Option

Expiration

Date(1)

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

have not

Vested(2)

Market Value

of Shares or Units of

Stock that have not

Vested(3)

Equity Incentive Plan Awards:

Grant Date

Exercisable

Unexercisable

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

other Rights

that have not

Vested(4)

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or other Rights 

that have not

Vested(5)


Bob De Lange

03/04/2013

3,994

$

89.75

03/04/2023

 

$

 

$

03/03/2014

5,795

$

96.31

03/03/2024

 

$

 

$

03/02/2015

31,888

$

83.00

03/02/2025

 

$

 

$

03/07/2016

46,870

$

74.77

03/07/2026

 

$

 

$

03/06/2017

$

 

$

14,112

(6)

$

2,084,060

03/06/2017

53,223

26,611

$

95.66

03/06/2027

 

$

 

$

03/05/2018

$

 

$

14,901

(7)

$

2,200,580

03/05/2018

20,171

40,341

$

151.12

03/05/2028

 

$

 

$

03/04/2019

$

 

$

11,832

(7)

$

1,747,350

03/04/2019

48,034

$

138.35

03/04/2029

 

$

 

$

(1)

Stock options granted in 2017, 2018 and 2019 are exercisable in one-third increments on each of the first through third year anniversaries of the date of grant for all NEOs except Mr. Bonfield. Mr. Bonfield’s 2018 option grant vests in one-third increments on March 5, 2019, March 5, 2020 and March 5, 2021, the same date as the other NEOs. Stock options expire ten years from the grant date for an active employee, except Mr. Bonfield’s 2018 options expire March 5, 2028, the same date as other NEOs.

(2)

The amounts shown include the portion of any prior RSU grants that were not vested as of December 31, 2019. The 2018 RSU grant to Mr. Bonfield provides for dividend equivalent units (DEUs) to accrue on unvested RSUs when a dividend is paid by the company. The amounts shown include any applicable DEUs as of December 31, 2019 (rounded to the nearest whole unit).

(3)

Market value is based on the number of RSUs, including, when applicable, DEUs that have not vested (rounded to the nearest whole unit), multiplied by $147.68, the closing price of Caterpillar’s common stock on December 31, 2019.

(4)

The amounts shown include the portion of any prior PRSU grants that were not vested as of December 31, 2019. The 2018 and 2019 PRSU grants provide for DEUs to accrue on unvested PRSUs when a dividend is paid by the Company. The amount shown includes any applicable DEUs accrued as of December 31, 2019 (rounded to the nearest whole unit).

(5)

Market value is based on the number of PRSUs, including, when applicable, DEUs that have not vested (rounded to the nearest whole unit) multiplied by $147.68, the closing price of Caterpillar’s common stock on December 31, 2019.

(6)

This amount represents the PRSUs that vested based on the achievement of an average ROE performance hurdle over the three-year performance cycle. The Company achieved the ROE performance hurdle and, accordingly, the PRSUs were released February 12, 2020.

(7)

This amount represents the PRSUs that are scheduled to vest following the end of the performance period in 2020 and 2021, respectively, based on the Company’s achievement of an average ROE performance hurdle over the three-year performance period. The number of PRSUs reported in this table assumes the aggregate ROE performance hurdle is achieved for the three-year performance period.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    46



Back to Contents

Table of Contents

OPTION AWARDS

STOCK AWARDS

NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED
SARs/OPTIONS

SAR /
OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE

SAR /
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
1

NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS
OF STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED
2

MARKET
VALUE
OF SHARES
OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED
3

EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:

NAME

   

GRANT
DATE

EXERCISABLE

UNEXERCISABLE

   

NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
4

   

MARKET OR
PAYOUT VALUE OF
UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS OR
OTHER RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
5

David P. Bozeman   03/02/2009   4,950         $22.17      03/02/2019           $                        $           
03/01/201057,642$57.8503/01/2020$$
03/07/201123,379$102.1303/07/2021$$
 03/05/201221,416$110.0903/05/2022$$
03/04/201327,083$89.7503/04/2023$$
03/03/201450,872$96.3103/03/2024$$
02/27/2015$$9,2046$853,579
03/02/201559,474$83.0003/02/2025$$
03/07/2016$ —$10,5027$973,955
03/07/201618,454$74.7703/07/2026$$

1 Stock options granted in 2014 are exercisable three years after the grant date. Stock options granted in 2015 and 2016 are exercisable in one-third increments on each of the first through third year anniversaries of the date of grant. Stock options expire 10 years from the grant date for an active employee.
2 The amounts shown include the portion of any prior RSU grants that were not vested as of December 31, 2016.
3 The market value of the non-vested RSUs is calculated using the closing price of Caterpillar common stock on December 30, 2016 ($92.74 per share).
4 The amounts shown include the portion of any prior PRSU grants that were not vested as of December 31, 2016.
5 The market value of the non-vested PRSUs is calculated using the closing price of Caterpillar common stock on December 30, 2016 ($92.74 per share).
6 Represents the PRSUs that are scheduled to vest in one-third increments on February 27, 2016, February 27, 2017 and February 27, 2018 based on the Company’s achievement of an annual ROE performance hurdle or, PRSUs that do not vest based on the annual performance hurdle, but may vest based on the achievement of an average ROE performance hurdle over the three-year performance cycle. For 2016, the Company did not achieve the ROE performance hurdle and, accordingly, none of the PRSUs vested based on 2016 performance. The number of PRSUs reported in this table assumes the aggregate ROE performance hurdle is achieved for the three-year performance cycle.
7 Represents the PRSUs that are scheduled to vest on March 7, 2019 based on the Company’s achievement of an average ROE performance hurdle over the three-year performance period. The number of PRSUs reported in this table assumes the aggregate ROE performance hurdle is achieved for the three-year performance period.
8These RSUs are scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017.

2016 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

  

OPTION AWARDS1

 

STOCK AWARDS2

NAME

   

NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON EXERCISE

   

VALUE REALIZED
ON EXERCISE

   

NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON VESTING

    

VALUE REALIZED
ON VESTING

Douglas R. Oberhelman                 30,570                          $2,497,520                                                    $           
Bradley M. Halverson  3,912   $323,402   834   $64,506 
Robert B. Charter     $      $ 
Jim Umpleby  6,722   $622,996   834   $64,506 
David P. Bozeman     $   1,000   $77,345 

1 Upon exercise, option holders may surrender shares to pay the option exercise price and satisfy income tax withholding requirements. The amounts shown are gross amounts.
2 Upon vesting of the RSUs, shares are surrendered to satisfy income tax withholding requirements. The amounts shown are gross amounts.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |45



Name

Option Awards(1)

 

Stock Awards(2)

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise

Value Realized

on Exercise

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

Value Realized

on Vesting

D. James Umpleby III

29,477

$

1,554,655

 

18,029

$

2,375,862

Andrew R. J. Bonfield

$

 

13,091

$

1,687,849

Denise C. Johnson

83,770

$

4,230,647

 

7,292

$

962,929

William P. Ainsworth

$

 

7,468

$

985,009

Bob De Lange

8,468

$

434,072

 

7,409

$

976,358

(1)

Upon exercise, option holders may surrender shares to satisfy income tax withholding requirements. The amounts shown are gross amounts.

(2)

Upon vesting of the RSUs or PRSUs, shares are surrendered to satisfy income tax withholding requirements. The amounts shown are gross amounts.


Table of2019PENSIONBENEFITS

Name

Plan Name(1)

Number of Years of

Credited Service(2)

Present Value of

Accumulated Benefit(3,4)

Payments During

Last Fiscal Year

D. James Umpleby III

RIP

25

$

2,445,955

$

Solar MRO

25

$

39,167,527

$

Andrew R. J. Bonfield

$

$

Denise C. Johnson

$

$

William P. Ainsworth

$

$

Bob De Lange

$

$

(1)

Mr. Umpleby participates in the Solar RP and Solar MRO as described in footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table. The Solar RP is a noncontributory U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan and the Solar MRO is a U.S. non-qualified pension plan. Mr. Umpleby entered Solar RP upon his initial hire with Solar Turbines Inc. on July 7, 1980.

(2)

Upon his initial hire with Solar Turbines Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar, on July 7, 1980, Mr. Umpleby became eligible to participate in the Solar Turbines Inc. Retirement Plan and the Solar Turbines Incorporated Managerial Retirement Objective Plan (Solar MRO). Mr. Umpleby has more than 39 years of service with the Company and meets the early retirement eligibility requirement of age 55 with at least ten years of service. Early retirement benefits paid under Solar RP and Solar MRO have a three percent reduction per year under age 62. The Solar RP was merged into RIP as of January 1, 2015; however, all benefit and eligibility provisions of Solar RP remain unchanged. The total benefit formula for the Solar RP is 60 percent of final average salary (which includes base pay) prorated for years of service less than 25 minus 65 percent of the monthly Social Security benefit. Final average salary is the average base salary for the highest consecutive 36-month period during the 120-month period prior to retirement. The Solar MRO provides a benefit under the same benefit formula but includes base salary and annual cash incentive pay. Amounts payable under both Solar RP and Solar MRO are based upon a maximum of 25 years of service. The employee’s annual retirement income benefit under the Solar RP is restricted by the Internal Revenue Code limitations and the excess benefits are paid from the Solar MRO. The Solar MRO is not funded. Mr. Bonfield, Mr. Ainsworth, Ms. Johnson and Mr. De Lange do not participate in a pension plan.

(3)

The present value of accumulated benefits payable is determined assuming commencement on Mr. Umpleby’s earliest unreduced retirement date using a discount rate of 3.15% and the RP-2014 White Collar separate annuitant and non-annuitant mortality table with a load factor of 92.9% adjusted backward to 2006 with MP-2014 and projected forward using Scale MP-2019 with a convergence at 2035 and 75% of long-term convergence rates (0.75% for ages up to and including 85). Mr. Umpleby satisfies the plans’ criteria, attainment of age 55 with at least 10 years of service, for unreduced early retirement benefits payable beginning at age 62.

(4)

Mr. Umpleby’s change in pension value was primarily due to an increase in his annual pensionable earnings resulting from an additional year of compensation as CEO. The pension benefit is based on the average of the highest consecutive 36 months in the 10-year period prior to the determination date of December 31, 2019, the same date on which the Solar RP and Solar MRO were frozen for all employees, including Mr. Umpleby. Pensionable earnings include base salary and annual cash incentive pay. During Mr. Umpleby’s tenure as CEO, there have been no changes made to the plans’ benefit formula provisions (other than to freeze benefit accruals) and Mr. Umpleby’s benefit is determined in the same manner as any similarly situated management employee with a similar service and compensation history.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    47


Back to Contents

2019NONQUALIFIEDDEFERREDCOMPENSATION

2016 PENSION BENEFITS

NAME     PLAN NAME1    NUMBER OF YEARS OF
CREDITED SERVICE2
PRESENT VALUE OF
ACCUMULATED BENEFIT3
Douglas R. Oberhelman      RIP                   35.00                              $3,033,881           
SERP35.00$24,220,406
Bradley M. HalversonRIP28.83$2,086,918
SERP28.83$4,581,907
Robert B. CharterCatSuper Plan27.67$3,529,420
Jim UmplebyRIP25.00$1,817,177
Solar MRO25.00$11,018,453
David P. BozemanRIP2.17$46,008
SERP2.17$20,915

1 Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan (RIP) is a noncontributory U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan and the Supplemental Retirement Plan (SERP) is a U.S. non-qualified pension plan. The total benefit formula across both plans is 1.5 percent for each year of service (capped at 35 years) multiplied by the final average earnings during the highest five of the final ten years of employment. Final average earnings include base salary and annual incentive compensation, including amounts deferred. The employee’s annual retirement income benefit under the qualified plan is restricted by the Internal Revenue Code limitations, and the excess benefits are paid from SERP. SERP is not funded. Mr. Charter participates in the Caterpillar of Australia PTY LTD Retirement Plan (CatSuper Plan), a defined benefit plan. The total benefit formula in the plan is 17.5 percent for each year of service multiplied by final average salary during the highest three of the final ten years of employment. Final average salary for this plan includes base salary and annual incentive compensation, including amounts deferred, without any limitation on the dollar amounts covered. The plan formula produces a lump sum amount. Mr. Umpleby participated in the Solar Turbines Incorporated Retirement Plan (Solar RP) through December 31, 2014, and participates in the Solar Turbines Incorporated Managerial Retirement Objective Plan (Solar MRO) because he was originally hired by Solar Turbines Incorporated, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar. The Solar RP was merged into RIP as of January 1, 2015; however, all benefit and eligibility provisions of Solar RP remain unchanged. The Solar RP is a noncontributory U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan and the Solar MRO is a U.S. non-qualified pension plan. The total benefit formula for the Solar RP is 60 percent of final average salary prorated for years of service less than 25 minus 65 percent of the monthly Social Security benefit. Final average salary is the average base salary for the highest consecutive 36 month period during the 120 month period prior to retirement. Amounts payable under both Solar RP and Solar MRO are based upon a maximum of 25 years of service. Mr. Umpleby meets the early retirement eligibility requirement of age 55. The Solar MRO provides a benefit under the same benefit formula and includes base salary and annual incentive pay. The employee’s annual retirement income benefit under the Solar RP is restricted by the Internal Revenue Code limitations and the excess benefits are paid from the Solar MRO. The Solar MRO is not funded. Mr. Bozeman participates in RIP and SERP calculated based on the Pension Equity Formula which produces a single lump sum benefit based on salary and service. The employee’s annual retirement income benefit under the qualified plan is restricted by the Internal Revenue Code limitations, and the excess benefits are paid from SERP. SERP is not funded.
2 Mr. Oberhelman, Mr. Halverson and Mr. Bozeman participate in RIP and SERP. Mr. Oberhelman has more than 35 years of service with the Company. Amounts payable under both RIP and SERP are based upon a maximum of 35 years of service. All RIP participants may receive their benefit immediately following termination of employment after reaching early retirement eligibility, or may defer benefit payments until any time between early retirement age and normal retirement age. SERP and Solar MRO participants receive their benefit six months after their retirement date. Normal retirement age is defined as age 65 with five years of service. For RIP and SERP participants, early retirement is defined as: any age with 30 years of service, age 55 with 15 years of service or age 60 with 10 years of service. If a participant elects early retirement, benefits are reduced by four percent per year, before age 62. In 2015, Mr. Oberhelman and the Company agreed to amend the Company’s SERP to provide that if Mr. Oberhelman terminates employment prior to age 65, his benefit under the SERP will be reduced for early retirement. Prior to the amendment, Mr. Oberhelman was entitled to an unreduced benefit under the SERP for any retirement after attainment of age 62. As current RIP and SERP participants, Mr. Oberhelman is eligible for early retirement, with a four percent reduction per year under age 65 in SERP and a four percent reduction per year under age 62 in RIP, while Mr. Halverson is eligible for early retirement, with a four percent reduction per year under age 62 in both plans. Mr. Charter, who participates in the CatSuper Plan, is currently vested in a benefit attributable to 18.75 years of his service. He also has a benefit under the same plan formula based on an additional 8.92 years of service which will vest if he remains employed with the Company until age 55. This additional benefit would result in a $1,626,317 increase in his accumulated pension value once fully vested. Normal retirement in the CatSuper Plan is defined as age 65 and early retirement is available at age 55, with no reduction to the lump sum earned. Mr. Umpleby, who participates in the Solar RP and Solar MRO, has more than 25 years of service with the Company and meets the early retirement eligibility requirement of age 55 with at least 10 years of service. Early retirement benefits paid under Solar RP and Solar MRO have a three percent reduction per year under age 62. The Solar RP was merged into RIP as of January 1, 2015; however, all benefit and eligibility provisions of Solar RP remain unchanged. Mr. Bozeman participates in RIP and SERP calculated based on the Pension Equity Formula (PEP) which produces a single lump sum benefit based on salary and service. The lump sum benefit is equal to Final Average Monthly Earnings, annualized and multiplied by the sum of percentages from a“2019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table based on credited service and vesting service. Multipliers range from 4% times years and months of credited service for 0-5 years of vesting service to 9% times years and months of credited service for vesting service in excess of 20 years. Following separation from service, a PEP participant may elect immediate distribution of the benefit, as a single lump sum or monthly annuity actuarially equivalent in amount to the single lump sum determined by formula.
3The amount in this column represents the actuarial present value for each NEO’s accumulated pension benefit on December 31, 2016. For each NEO, it assumes benefits are payable at each NEO’s earliest unreduced retirement age based upon current level of pensionable income. Present value factors use an interest rate of 3.97 percent and the RP-2014 separate annuitant and non-annuitant mortality table adjusted with a load factor of 99.4 percent using Projection Scale MP-2014 prior to 2006 then Scale MP-2016 in years 2006 and beyond which are SERP’s year-end disclosure assumptions at December 31, 2016. The amount reported for Mr. Charter has been converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2016 (1 Australian dollar = 0.72355 U.S. dollar).

46 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

2016 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

NAMEPLAN NAME1EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN 20162
REGISTRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN 20162
AGGREGATE
EARNINGS
IN 20163
AGGREGATE
BALANCE
AT 12/31/164
Douglas R. Oberhelman  SDCP          $80,100                 $40,050               $1,239,978           $4,308,984    
SEIP$$$287,494$980,618
DEIP$$$539,682$1,951,822
Bradley M. HalversonSDCP$31,279$15,639$367,585$1,287,511
 SEIP$$$1,337$4,559
DEIP$$$25,296$86,291
Robert B. CharterSDCP$27,886$13,943$1,132$42,961
Jim UmplebySDCP$33,638$16,819$484,167$2,384,883
SEIP$$$2,353$32,591
DEIP$$$306,161$2,665,759
David P. BozemanSDCP$15,551$76,803$166,201$1,015,649

1The Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan (SDCP) is adescribes unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan adopted in March 2007 with a retroactive effective dateplans that permit the deferral of January 1, 2005, which effectively replaced the Supplemental Employees’ Investment Plan (SEIP)salary, bonus and Deferred Employees’ Investment Plan (DEIP).
2 SDCP allows eligible U.S. employees, including all NEOs, to voluntarily defer a portion of their base salary and annual incentive pay into the plan and receive a Companyshort-term cash performance awards by NEOs. These plans also provide for matching contribution. SPP pay may also be deferred, but does not qualify for any Company matching contributions. Amounts deferred by executives in 2016 for base salary, annual incentive pay and/or long-term cash incentive payouts are included in the “2016 Summary Compensation Table.” Matching and/or annual non-elective contributions by the Company. NEOs are eligible to receive the amount in non-qualifiedtheir deferred compensation plans madeaccounts following termination under any termination scenario unless the NEO elected to further defer the payment as permitted by Caterpillar in 2016 are also included in the “2016 All Other Compensation Table” under the Matching Contributions SDCP column. SDCP participants may elect a lump sum payment, or an installment distribution payable for upplans.

Name

Plan

Name(1)

Executive

Contributions

in 2019(2)

Registrant

Contributions

in 2019(2)

Aggregate

Earnings

in 2019(3)

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

Aggregate

Balance at

12/31/19(4)

D. James Umpleby III

SDCP

$

362,220

$

181,110

$

1,052,741

$

$

5,203,650

SEIP

$

$

$

9,155

$

$

45,901

DEIP

$

$

$

903,257

$

$

4,130,940

Andrew R. J. Bonfield

SDCP

$

41,440

$

41,440

$

4,898

$

$

87,778

Denise C. Johnson

SDCP

$

580,453

$

191,242

$

383,878

$

$

2,606,136

William P. Ainsworth

SDCP

$

$

$

$

$

Bob De Lange

SDCP

$

99,708

$

177,430

$

66,711

$

$

513,643

(1)

The Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan (SDCP) is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan adopted in March 2007 with a retroactive effective date of January 1, 2005, which effectively replaced the Supplemental Employees’ Investment Plan (SEIP) and Deferred Employees’ Investment Plan (DEIP).

(2)

SDCP allows eligible U.S. employees, including all NEOs, to voluntarily defer a portion of their base salary and annual incentive pay into the plan and receive a Company matching contribution. Amounts deferred by executives in 2019 are included in the “2019 Summary Compensation Table.” Matching and/or annual non-elective contributions in non-qualified deferred compensation plans made by Caterpillar in 2019 are also included in the “2019 All Other Compensation Table” under the Company Contributions SDCP column. SDCP participants may elect a lump sum payment or an installment distribution payable for up to 15 years after separation.

(3)

Aggregate earnings comprise interest, dividends, capital gains and appreciation/depreciation of investment results. The investment choices available to the participant mirror those of the Company’s 401(k) plans.

(4)

Amounts in this column include the following amounts reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the years 2017–2019 as follows: Mr. Umpleby $1,065,309, Mr. Bonfield $82,880, Ms. Johnson $1,382,725 and Mr. De Lange $441,733.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    48


Back to 15 years after separation.
3 Aggregate earnings comprise interest, dividends, capital gains and appreciation/depreciation of investment results. The investment choices available to the participant mirror those of the Company’s 401(k) plan.
4 Amounts in this column include the following amounts that were previously reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” for the years 2014–2016 as follows: Mr. Oberhelman $829,791; Mr. Halverson $301,690; Mr. Charter $41,829; Mr. Umpleby $354,520 and Mr. Bozeman $92,354.Contents

2017 Proxy Statement

 |47




Table of ContentsPOTENTIALPAYMENTSUPONTERMINATIONORCHANGEINCONTROL

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Except for customary provisions in employee compensation plans and as required by law, there are no pre-existing severance or change in control agreements with the NEOs.

The following is a summary of the compensation that would become payable under the existing compensation plans if an NEO’s employment had terminated on December 31, 20162019 in each of the following scenarios:

Voluntary Separation, including retirement that does not qualify as Long-Service Separation

Long-Service Separation (separation after age 55 with five or more years of Company service)

Termination for Cause

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason within one year following a change in control (termination following CIC)

EQUITY AWARDS

Voluntary Separation including retirement that does not qualify as Long-Service Separation

Long-Service Separation (separation after age 55 with 5 or more years of Company service effective with the 2011 equity grant, and age 55 with 10 or more years of service for prior year grants)

Termination for Cause

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason within one year following a change in control (Termination following CIC)


EQUITY AWARDS
Voluntary SeparationStock Options and SARs: Vested awards are exercisable until the earlier of the expiration date or 60 days from the separation date; unvested awards are forfeited

PRSUs and RSUs: Unvested awards are forfeited

Long-Service Separation

Stock Options and SARs granted prior to 2016: Vest and are exercisable until the earlier of the expiration date or 60 months from the separation date

Stock Options and SARs granted in 2016: Vest and become immediately exercisable for the remaining term of the award

RSUs: Accelerated vesting; Chairman’s RSU Awards

Stock Options granted prior to May 2014 are not eligiblein 2017 and after: Vest over the normal vesting schedule and become exercisable for Long-Service Separation treatmentthe remaining term of the award

RSUs granted in 2015: Accelerated vesting

RSUs granted in 2017 and after: Vest over their normal vesting schedule

PRSUs granted in 2017 and 2018: Remain outstanding and vest on a prorated basis if and to the extent performance goal is achieved; proration is based on the number of months employed during the performance cycle

PRSUs:

PRSUs granted in 2019 and after: Remain outstanding and vest if and to the extent performance goals aregoal is achieved

Termination for Cause

Stock Options and SARs: Vested but unexercised awards and unvested awards are forfeited

PRSUs and RSUs: Unvested awards are forfeited

Termination following CIC

Stock Options and SARs:Options: Vest and become immediately exercisable for remaining term of the award

PRSUs and RSUs: Accelerated vesting of outstanding awards

ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARDS

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

Voluntary Separation

Payment is forfeited

Long-Service Separation

Payment for a pro-rated service period based on actual results

Termination for Cause

Payment is forfeited

Termination following CIC

Payment for a pro-rated service period assuming achievement of target opportunity

STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE PLAN
Voluntary SeparationPayment is forfeited
Long-Service SeparationPayment for a pro-rated service period based on actual results
Termination for CausePayment is forfeited
Termination following CICPayment for entire performance period assuming achievement of maximum opportunity (not applicable to Short-Term Incentive Plan)


DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The “2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table on page 47 describes unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plans that permit the deferral of salary, bonus and short-term cash performance awards by NEOs. These plans also provide for matching and/or annual non-electivecontributions by the Company. NEOs are eligible

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    49


Back to receive the amount in their deferred compensation accounts following termination under any termination scenario unless the NEO elected to further defer the payment as permitted by the plans.

48 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

SEVERANCE PAY

The Company is not obligated to provide any special severance payments to any NEOs.

DEPARTURE OF DAVID P. BOZEMAN

Mr. Bozeman served as an executive officer of the company through December 31, 2016. Mr. Bozeman’s position was eliminated in connection with the Company’s ongoing restructuring efforts, and in consideration of his service to the Company, as well as a release of claims in favor of the Company, Mr. Bozeman was provided a severance payment of $2,300,000. In addition, the Committee approved theaccelerated, pro-rata vesting of 666 shares of restricted stock units and 96,359 stock options previously granted to Mr. Bozeman and a 12-month post-separation exercise period. The Committee also approved continued, pro-rata vesting of his outstanding 2015-2017 and 2016-2018 PRSUs, with the level determined based on actual performance during the respective performance periods.

POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS FOR DOUGLAS R. OBERHELMAN

At the discretion of the Committee, certain benefits may be continued for the CEO upon retirement. On December 13, 2016, the Committee approved the following retirement benefits for Mr. Oberhelman effective April 1, 2017: (1) office space and related IT, administrative and travel agent supportat the Company’s facility located in Edwards, Illinois; and (2) continued home security for a period not to exceed five years from the date of Mr. Oberhelman’s retirement. The annual cost of these continued benefits is estimated to be approximately $165,447.

TERMS AND POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

TERMSANDPOTENTIALPAYMENTSCHANGEINCONTROL

The following tabular information quantifies certain payments that would become payable under existing plans and arrangements if the NEO’s employment had terminated on December 31, 2016.2019. The information is provided relative totheto the NEO’s compensation and service levels as of the date specified. If applicable, they are based on the Company’s closing stock price on December 30, 2016.31, 2019.

Name

Termination Scenario(1)

Equity Awards

Annual

Incentive(4)

Retention/Retirement

Payment

 

 

Total

Stock

Options/

SARs(2)

PRSUs/RSUs(3)

D. James Umpleby III

Voluntary Separation

$

5,243,669

$

15,983,665

$

2,336,000

 

$

 

$

23,563,334

Termination for Cause

$

$

$

 

$

 

$

Termination following CIC

$

5,243,669

$

18,201,308

$

2,756,849

 

$

 

$

26,201,826

Andrew R. J. Bonfield

Voluntary Separation

$

$

$

730,000

 

$

 

$

730,000

Termination for Cause

$

$

$

 

$

 

$

Termination following CIC

$

602,017

$

4,781,488

$

947,726

 

$

 

$

6,331,231

Denise C. Johnson

Voluntary Separation

$

$

$

840,000

 

$

 

$

840,000

Termination for Cause

$

$

$

 

$

 

$

Termination following CIC

$

2,298,656

$

6,714,529

$

930,389

 

$

 

$

9,943,574

William P. Ainsworth

Voluntary Separation

$

1,709,062

$

4,617,001

$

744,000

 

$

 

$

7,070,063

Termination for Cause

$

$

$

 

$

 

$

Termination following CIC

$

1,709,062

$

5,026,429

$

829,112

 

$

 

$

7,564,603

Bob De Lange

Voluntary Separation

$

$

$

820,000

 

$

 

$

820,000

Termination for Cause

$

$

$

 

$

 

$

Termination following CIC

$

1,832,461

$

6,032,039

$

876,159

 

$

 

$

8,740,659

(1) If a NEO qualifies for Long-Service Separation and voluntarily separates from the company, Long-Service Separation rules will apply. In 2019, Mr. Umpleby and Mr. Ainsworth each qualified for Long-Service Separation and would therefore receive the amounts reported under “Voluntary Separation.”

(2) For valuation purposes, as of December 31, 2019 the option exercise price was lower than the year-end closing price of $147.68 for the 2017 Proxy Statement

and 2019 grants and for Mr. Bonfield’s options granted on September 7, 2018, and higher than the year-end closing price of $147.68 for the 2018 grant for NEOs other than Mr. Bonfield. The 2017, 2018 and 2019 grants were not fully vested as of December 31, 2019.

 |49(3) The valuation shown is based on the number of PRSUs and RSUs, including any applicable DEUs, that would vest multiplied by the closing price of Caterpillar common stock on December 31, 2019, which was $147.68 per share.

(4) The AIP provisions limit the payout to a maximum of $15.0 million in any single year. Amounts shown for “Termination following CIC” represent the target payout available under AIP.


2020 PROXY STATEMENT    50



Back to Contents

Table of ContentsCOMPENSATIONRISK

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

EQUITY AWARDSINCENTIVE
NAMETERMINATION SCENARIOSTOCK
OPTIONS/
SARS1
 PRSUs/RSUs2SHORT-TERM
INCENTIVE3
 LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE4
POST
TERMINATION
BENEFITS
TOTAL
Douglas R. Oberhelman   Voluntary Separation   $       $          $      $      $
Long-Service Separation$10,315,168$5,127,595$2,800,014$$18,242,777
Termination for Cause$$$$$
Termination following CIC$10,315,168$5,127,595$5,600,028$$21,042,791
Bradley M. HalversonVoluntary Separation$$$$$
Long-Service Separation$3,397,180$1,625,361$904,259$$5,926,800
Termination for Cause$$$$$
Termination following CIC$3,397,180$1,625,361$1,808,518$$6,831,059
Robert B. CharterVoluntary Separation$$$$$
 Long-Service Separation$$$$$
Termination for Cause$$$$$
Termination following CIC$3,120,591$1,411,225$1,678,466$$6,210,282
Jim UmplebyVoluntary Separation$$$$$
Long-Service Separation$3,730,789$1,749,169$938,176$$6,418,134
Termination for Cause$$$$$
Termination following CIC$3,730,789$1,749,169$1,876,352$$7,356,310
David P. BozemanVoluntary Separation$$$$$
Long-Service Separation$$$$$
Termination for Cause$$$$$
Termination following CIC$2,141,726$1,035,720$698,904$$3,876,350

1For valuation purposes, as of December 30, 2016, when the closing price of Caterpillar common stock was $92.74, the 2015 and 2016 grants were in the money while the 2014 option exercise price was higher than the year-end closing price thus the 2014 grant was underwater. The 2014, 2015 and 2016 grants were not fully vested as of December 31, 2016.
2The valuation shown is based upon the number of PRSUs and RSUs that would vest multiplied by the closing price of Caterpillar common stock on December 30, 2016, which was $92.74 per share.
3The plan provisions limit the payout to a maximum of $15.0 million in any single year. Amounts shown for Termination following CIC represent the maximum payout available under AIP for all NEOs.
4In years before 2015, long-term incentive compensation design was based on two components – a rolling three-year cash plan and market-based stock option grants. Beginning in 2015, the Committee revised the long-term incentive plan, eliminating the cash portion for NEOs and replacing it with stock-settled PRSUs. There are no amounts shown for termination following CIC as there are no longer any outstanding rolling three-year cash plan performance periods for the NEOs listed.

COMPENSATION RISK

The Compensation CommitteeCHRC regularly reviews the Company’s compensation policies and practices, including the risks created by the Company’s compensation plans. In addition, the Company also conducted a review of its compensation plans and related risks to the Company. The Company reviewed its analysis with the CommitteeCHRC and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and the CommitteeCHRC concluded that the compensation plans reflected the appropriate compensation goals and philosophy.philosophy and do not incentivize excessive or inappropriate risk taking. Based on this review and analysis, the Company has concluded that any risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

50 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsCEOPAYRATIO

PROPOSAL 4 – ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION VOTES

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT
What am I voting on?

Shareholders are being asked to indicate whether they prefer an advisory vote on executive compensation every one, two or three years.

Voting Recommendation:
ONE YEAR

The Dodd-Frank Act requires Caterpillar shareholders to vote, on an advisory or non-binding basis, on how frequently they would like to cast an advisory vote onCompany is providing the following disclosure about the relationship of the annual total compensation of its employees to the annual total compensation of Mr. Umpleby, the Chairman and CEO. To better understand this disclosure, it is important to emphasize that the Company’s named executive officers. By voting oncompensation programs are designed to reflect local market practices across our global operations. The Company strives to create a competitive global compensation program in terms of both the position and the geographic location in which Caterpillar employees are located. As a result, the Company’s compensation programs vary among each local market to provide for a competitive compensation package.

The median annual total compensation of all Caterpillar employees, other than Mr. Umpleby, was $65,132.

Mr. Umpleby’s annual total compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table was $34,519,129.

The ratio of Mr. Umpleby’s annual total compensation compared to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 530 to 1.

As permitted by SEC rules, it was determined that for 2019 the Company could refer to the same median employee that was identified for 2017. There has been no change in either our employee population or our employee compensation arrangements in 2019 and 2018 that we believe would significantly impact our pay ratio disclosure. The median employee was identified by including all full- and part-time employees as of October 1, 2017, of which approximately 43 percent were in the U.S. and 57 percent were outside of the United States. The Company did not exclude any of its employees when determining the employee population from which to identify the median employee. For purposes of identifying the Company’s median employee, the Company considered the base salary and annual cash incentive. Base salary and annual cash incentive were chosen because (i) they represent the principal forms of compensation delivered to all employees and (ii) this proposal, shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officerinformation is readily available in each country. In addition, compensation once every one, two or three years.was measured using the 12-month period ending December 31, 2017.

The Board believes that conducting advisory vote on executiveCompany’s median employee’s total compensation on an annual basis is appropriate for Caterpillar and its shareholders at this time. However, the Board intends to hold say-on-pay votes in the future2019 was calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, as required pursuant to the alternative that receives the most shareholder support.SEC executive compensation disclosure rules.

PROPOSAL 5 – APPROVE THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT
What am I voting on?

Shareholders are being asked to approve changes to the long-term incentive plan, including increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan.

Voting Recommendation:
FOR
proposal

INTRODUCTION

On April 12, 2017, the Board approved an amendment and restatement of the Caterpillar Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated, the “2014 LTIP”) The amendment and restatement increases the total number of shares available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP from 38,800,000 to 74,800,000, modifies the permitted performance measures and increasesAs required by SEC rules, the annual award limits applicable to non-employee directors.total compensation for both Mr. Umpleby and the median employee includes the change in pension value during the year. The Board approved the 2014 LTIPchange in pension value is subject to approval byseveral variables and may differ significantly based on year-over-year changes in interest rates, changes in eligible earnings and the Company’s shareholders.formula under which the benefits are determined (see footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table on page 42 regarding Mr. Umpleby’s change in pension value). If the 2014 LTIP is not approved by shareholders,change in pension value were eliminated from Mr. Umpleby’s and the Company will continuemedian employee’s total compensation, the CEO to operate the 2014 LTIP pursuantmedian employee pay ratio for 2019 would have been 283 to its current provisions.1.

Purpose of the amendment and restatement. 2020 PROXY STATEMENT    51 The Board approved the 2014 LTIP


Back to increase the number of shares available for future issuances and approve the other changes described above.Contents

As of March 31, 2017, 11,434,997 shares of the Company’s common stock remained available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP. The amendment and restatement increases the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2014 LTIP from 38,800,000 to 74,800,000. Accordingly, if the 2014 LTIP is approved, approximately 47,434,997 shares of the Company’s Common Stock will be available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP. Under the terms of the 2014 LTIP, this number may be increased to the extent that shares subject

2017 Proxy Statement

 |51




Table of ContentsSHAREHOLDERPROPOSALS

to awards previously granted under the 2014 LTIP are not issued because of the expiration, termination, cancellation of forfeiture of an award or the settlement of an award in cash.

Given the limited number of shares that currently remain available under the 2014 LTIP, our Board and management believe it is important that the 2014 LTIP be approved in order to maintain the Company’s ability to attract and retain key personnel and continue to provide them with strong incentives to contribute to the Company’s future success.

Approval of the 2014 LTIP will also constitute re-approval, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), of the material terms of the performance measures contained in the 2014 LTIP (described below) that are to be used in connection with awards under the 2014 LTIP that are intended to qualifyas “performance-based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m). One of the conditions for compensation to be considered “performance-based” under Section 162(m) is that the material terms under which such compensation will be paid (the class of eligible employees, performance criteria and the per-person maximums) be disclosed to and approved by shareholders every five years.

The 2014 LTIP allows us to grant equity and cash incentive awards to our executive officers, employees, non-employee Board members and other service providers. We believe that a comprehensive incentive compensation program serves as a necessary and significant tool to attract and retain key employees, encourage participants to contribute materially to the growth of Caterpillar and align the interests of our participants with those of our shareholders.

As of March 31, 2017:

Total Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights Outstanding32,582,965
Total Restricted Stock Units Outstanding2,617,032
Total Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Outstanding1,162,951
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights Outstanding$84.73
Total Shares Available for Grant under the 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan11,434,997
Weighted-Average Remaining Term of Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights Outstanding6.34 years

As of the record date, April 17, 2017, total common stock outstanding was 589,157,050.

PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF THE 2014 LTIP

The 2014 LTIP includes features that take into account our shareholders’ interests, including:

The 2014 LTIP provides for a variety of equity and equity-based awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock- or cash-based performance awards. The breadth of awards available under the 2014 LTIP provides the Compensation and Human Resources Committee (Committee) the flexibility to structure appropriate incentives and respond to market-competitive changes in compensation practices.

The 2014 LTIP uses ‘‘fungible share counting,’’ that is, for each share of stock issued in connection with a stock award, restricted stock award, restricted stock unit, performance share or other similar full-value award, we will reduce the number of shares available for future issuance by 2.75 shares, and for each share of stock issued in connection with an option or stock-settled stock appreciation right, by one share.

There is no ‘‘evergreen’’ provision.

There are limitations on the number of shares and the value of any cash-based award that may be granted orpaid to any participant under the 2014 LTIP in any fiscal year or performance period.

Repricing of options and stock appreciation rights is prohibited without shareholder approval.

Discounted options and stock appreciation rights are prohibited.

Shares repurchased on the open market with proceeds from the exercise of stock options will not be returned to the share reserve.

There is no single trigger vesting for awards that continue or are assumed in connection with a change in control. However, upon a participant’s qualifying termination of employment within two years following a change in control, outstanding awards will vest in full (i.e. ‘‘double trigger’’).

Awards are subject to forfeiture upon violation of non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions.

Awards are subject to forfeiture and clawback in connection with misconduct that results in a restatement of financial statements.

No dividends or dividend equivalents will be paid on performance-based awards unless the performance goals are satisfied.


52 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsPROPOSAL

The 2014 LTIP includes a series of performance criteria which the Committee may use in establishing specific targets to be attained as a condition to the vesting of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance shares or other stock-based or cash-based incentive awards under the plan so as to qualify the compensation attributable to those awards as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. This statutory provision generally disallows an income tax deduction to publicly held companies for compensation which exceeds $1 million per individual within a designated executive officergroup, unless that compensation is tied to the attainment of certain performance milestones established by an independent compensation committee under a shareholder-approved plan. Shareholder approval of the 2014 LTIP will also be considered approval of the material terms of the performance criteria under the 2014 LTIP. The Committee will retain discretion to determine the structure of all awards made pursuant the 2014 LTIP, including whether such awards comply with the applicable requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF 2014 LTIP4

The following is a summary of the principal features of the 2014 LTIP. The summary, however, is not a complete description of all the terms of the 2014 LTIP and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2014 LTIP attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A. To the extent there is a conflict between this summary and the actual terms of the 2014 LTIP, the terms of the 2014 LTIP will govern. Awards to be made under the 2014 LTIP will be entirely in the discretion of the Committee and are therefore not currently determinable.

Administration

The Committee has the exclusive authority to administer the 2014 LTIP with respect to awards made to our executive officers. The Committee also has the authority to make awards to all other eligible individuals.

The Committee may at any time appoint a secondary committee of one or more directors to have separate but concurrent authority with the Committee to make awards to such other eligible individuals. The Committee may also delegate authority to one or more officers of Caterpillar with respect to awards to such other individuals. The term “plan administrator,” as used in this summary, means the Committee and any delegates, to the extent they are acting within the scope of their administrative authority under the 2014 LTIP.

Eligibility

Persons that are or are expected to become officers or employees, non-employee directors, consultants and independent contractors of the Company or one of our subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the 2014 LTIP. Historically, the Committee has selected only management level employees to receive equity grants. Our twelve non-employee directors receive equity grants pursuant to our director compensation program. Approximately 2,100 management-level employees received equity grants in the 2017 annual equity grant cycle, which occurred on March 6, 2017.

Share Reserve

Subject to capitalization adjustments described below, approximately 47,434,997 million shares of common stock will initially be reserved for issuance under the 2014 LTIP. The shares of common stock issuable under the 2014 LTIP may be drawn from shares of our authorized but unissued common stock or from treasury shares (including shares of our common stock that we purchase on the open market or in private transactions).

Fungible Share Counting

The number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2014 LTIP shall be reduced: (i) on a 1-for-1 basis for each share of common stock subject to an option or stock-settled stock appreciation right, and (ii) by a fixed ratio of 2.75 shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued pursuant to a stock award, restricted stock award, restricted stock unit, performance share or other full-value award.

Individual Limits

Subject to capitalization adjustments, no participant in the 2014 LTIP may receive: (i) options or stock appreciation rights in any fiscal year for more than 800,000 shares of our common stock, (ii) performance-based restricted stock, restricted stock unit or performance awards for shares of our common stock having a fair market value on the grant date of more than $20 million for each 12-month period in the performance period or (iii) performance-based cash awards for more than $20 million for each 12-month period in the performance period.


2017 Proxy Statement

 |53




Table of Contents

Reuse of Shares

Shares subject to any outstanding awards under the 2014 LTIP that are not issued because of the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of an award or the settlement of an award in cash will be added back to the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2014 LTIP and will accordingly be available for subsequent issuance as follows:

one share for each share of common stock subject to an option or stock appreciation right and
2.75 shares for each share of common stock subject to a full-value award.

Should the exercise price of an option or stock appreciation right or any withholding taxes upon such exercise be paid in shares of our common stock (whether by delivery or withholding of shares), then the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2014 LTIP will be reduced by the gross number of shares for which that option or stock appreciation right is exercised (including the shares delivered or withheld in connection with the exercise), and not by the net number of new shares issued under the exercised option or stock appreciation right.

Should shares of common stock be withheld by us in satisfaction of the withholding taxes incurred in connection with the exercise, issuance or vesting of a full-value award, or should the participant pay such withholding taxes by delivering shares of our common stock, then the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP will be reduced by the net number of shares issuable pursuant to that award, as calculated after any such share withholding or delivery so that the shares withheld by us or delivered by the participant for withholding of such taxes in connection with such full-value awards will again be available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP.

Shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the exercise price of options will not be available for issuance under the 2014 LTIP. However, shares subject to awards settled in cash will again be available in the ratios described above.


AWARDS

Under the 2014 LTIP, eligible persons may be granted options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock or cash-based performance awards. One or more of these awards may also be structured as Section 162(m) awards. The plan administrator will have complete discretion to determine which eligible individuals are to receive awards, the type of awards to be granted, the time or times when those awards are to be granted, the number of shares subject to each such grant, the vesting and issuance schedule (if any) to be in effect for the grant, the exercise price or other consideration for the shares, the maximum term for which the granted option or stock appreciation right is to remain outstanding and the status of any granted option as either an incentive stock option or a nonqualified option under the federal tax laws, subject to the following provisions.

Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights

The exercise price of a stock option will not be less than one hundred percent of the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date and no option will have a term in excess of ten years, except that the term of a nonqualified option will continue if the option would otherwise expire during a blackout period in which trading in our stock is restricted.

A stock appreciation right will allow the holder to exercise that right as to a specific number of shares of common stock and receive in exchange an appreciation distribution in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the shares of common stock as to which the right is exercised over (ii) the aggregate base price in effect for those shares. The base price per share may not be less than the fair market value per share of common stock on the date the stock appreciation right is granted, and the right may not have a term in excess of ten years, except that the term of a stock appreciation right will continue if the stock appreciation right would otherwise expire during a blackout period in which trading in our stock is restricted. Stock appreciation rights may also be granted in tandem with options; such tandem stock appreciation rights will provide the holders with the right to surrender their options for an appreciation distribution in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the vested shares of common stock subject to the surrendered option over (ii) the aggregate exercise price payable for those shares. The applicable award agreement will specify whether the appreciation distribution on any exercised stock appreciation right will be paid in cash or in shares of common stock.


54 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

Repricing/Cash-Out

The plan administrator may not implement any of the following repricing or cash-out programs without obtaining shareholder approval: (i) a reduction in the exercise price or base price of any previously granted option or stock appreciation right, (ii) a cancellation of any previously granted option or stock appreciation right in exchange for another option or stock appreciation right with a lower exercise price or base price or (iii) a cancellation of any previously granted option or stock appreciation rights in exchange for cash or another award if the exercise price of the option or the base price of the stock appreciation right exceeds the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of such cancellation, in each case other than in connection with a change in control or the capitalization adjustment provisions in the 2014 LTIP.

Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Shares

Stock awards may be issued subject to performance or service vesting requirements or as fully vested shares. The number of fully-vested shares granted under the 2014 LTIP is limited to (i) awards to non-employee directors, (ii) awards to newly hired employees, (iii) awards made in lieu of a cash bonus and (iv) awards for shares that, in the aggregate, do not exceed five percent of the total number of shares initially available under the 2014 LTIP (2,371,750 shares). Restricted stock units will entitle an award recipient to receive shares (or cash) upon the attainment of designated performance goals or the completion of a prescribed service period or upon the expiration of a designated time period following the vesting of those units.

Performance awards may be denominated and paid in shares of our common stock or in cash, with vesting tied to the attainment of performance objectives over a specified performance period, and any service vesting or other conditions all as established by the plan administrator.

Stock awards may provide for the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents, provided that no dividends or dividend equivalents will be paid on performance-based awards unless the applicable performance goals are satisfied.

Section 162(m) Awards and Performance Goals

In order to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, which permits compensation attributable to certain types of awards under the 2014 LTIP to qualify as performance-based compensation that is not subject to the $1 million limitation on the income tax deductibility of the compensation paid to each of our named executive officers (other than our principal financial officer) the plan administrator may grant Section 162(m) awards so that those awards will vest only upon the achievement of certain pre-established performance goals on one or more of the following criteria:

(i) attainment by a share of common stock of a specified fair market value for a specified period of time, (ii) cash flow from operations, (iii) cash flow margin or free cash flow, (iv) cash flow per share, (v) earnings of the Company before or after taxes and/or interest, (vi) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and/or amortization (EBITDA), (vii) EBITDA margin, (viii) economic value added, (ix) expense levels or cost reduction goals, (x) gross profit or margin, (xi) increase in shareholder value, (xii) interest expense, (xiii) inventory, (xiv) market share, (xv) net assets, (xvi) net cash provided by operations, (xvii) net operating profits after taxes, (xviii) operating expenses, (xix) operating income, (xx) operating margin, (xxi) operating profit after capital charge (OPACC), (xxii) percent of dealer deliveries (PODD), (xxiii) percent of industry sales (PINS), (xxiv) percent of parts sales (POPS), (xxv) percent of parts sales — Caterpillar branded (POPS-C), (xxvi) pretax income, (xxvii) price-to-earnings growth, (xxviii) price realization, (xxix) primary or fully-diluted earnings per share or profit per share, (xxx) profit after tax, (xxxi) return on assets, (xxxii) return on equity, (xxxiii) return on invested capital, (xxxiv) return on investments, (xxxv) return on sales, (xxxvi) revenues, (xxxvii) sales, (xxxviii) total cash flow, (xxxix) total shareholder (shareholder) return and (xl) strategic business criteria consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified goals relating to (A) acquisitions or divestitures, (B) business expansion, (C) realized production system benefits, (D) cost targets, (E) customer acquisition, (F) customer satisfaction, (G) diversity and inclusion, (H) efficiency, (I) inventory turns, (J) realized lean benefits, (K) management of employment practices and employee benefits, (L) market penetration, (M) purchasing material costs, (N) quality and quality audit scores, (O) reductions in errors and omissions, (P) reductions in lost business, (Q) supervision of litigation and information technology, (R) sustainability or (S) realized 6 Sigma benefits.


2017 Proxy Statement

 |55




Table of Contents

Each such goal may be expressed on an absolute or relative basis and may include comparisons based on current internal targets, the past performance of the Company (including the performance of one or more subsidiaries, divisions, or operating units) or the past or current performance of other companies (or a combination of such past and current performance). In addition to the ratios specifically listed above, performance goals may include comparisons relating to capital (including, but not limited to, the cost of capital), shareholders’ equity, shares outstanding, assets or net assets, sales, or any combination thereof. The applicable performance measures may be applied on a pre- or post-tax basis and may be established or adjusted in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code to include or exclude objectively determinable components of any performance measure, including, without limitation, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, nonrecurring, infrequently occurring or one-time events affecting the Company or its financial statements or changes in law or accounting principles. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may amend or adjust the performance measures or other terms and conditions of an outstanding award in recognition of any permitted adjustment events, which in the case of an award that is intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, will be exercised in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m). The Committee has the discretion to determine the structure of all awards under the 2014 LTIP, including whether such awards comply with the applicable requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and to grant cash-based awards outside of the 2014 LTIP that may not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Shareholder approval of the 2014 LTIP will also constitute approval of the material terms of the performance criteria under the 2014 LTIP for purposes of establishing the specific vesting targets for one or more awards under the 2014 LTIP that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. However, not all awards granted under the 2014 LTIP may be structured to qualify as such performance-based compensation and there is no guarantee that the exemption would be available for performance-based awards granted under the 2014 LTIP in any particular circumstance. To maintain flexibility in compensating our executives, the Committee reserves the right to use its judgment to grant or approve awards or compensation that is nondeductible when the Committee believes such awards or compensation is appropriate.


GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL AWARDS

Change in Control and Vesting Acceleration

A change in control will be deemed to occur if (i) there are certain changes in the composition of our Board of Directors, (ii) any person or group of related persons becomes directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than twenty percent of the total combined voting power of our stock, (iii) we are acquired in a merger or (iv) our shareholders approve a complete liquidation, dissolution or sale of substantially all of our assets.

If, upon a change of control, the existing awards remain outstanding or are replaced with substantially equivalent awards of a successor, then the existing or substitute awards will remain governed by their respective terms; provided, however, that if a participant’s service with us or a successor entity is terminated without cause or for good reason within two years following a change in control, then all awards held by such participant will vest, any restrictions will lapse and uncompleted performance measures will be deemed satisfied at the target level of performance.

If, following a change in control, the existing awards do not remain outstanding or are not assumed or replaced with substantially equivalent awards, then all awards will vest, any restrictions will lapse and uncompleted performance measures will be deemed satisfied at the target level of performance. The plan administrator may further cancel (A) any option or stock appreciation right in exchange for cash equal to the excess of the aggregate fair market value of the common stock subject to the award over the exercise price and (B) restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance share awards or other awards denominated in shares of stock, in exchange for the cash value of the award as determined by the stock price and the actual or deemed satisfaction of the performance measures.


56 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

The acceleration of vesting in the event of a change in control may be seen as an anti-takeover provision and may have the effect of discouraging a merger proposal, a takeover attempt or other efforts to gain control of us.

Changes in Capitalization

If an equity restructuring causes the per share value of our common stock to change, such as by reason of a stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering, recapitalization or otherwise, equitable adjustments will be made to the number of shares available for issuance under the plan and to the terms of outstanding awards in a manner designed to preclude any dilution or enlargement of the plan and the outstanding awards.

Valuation

For any award made pursuant to the 2014 LTIP, the fair market value per share of our common stock as of any date will be deemed to be equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on such date, or determined pursuant to such other method as may be selected by the Committee.

Shareholder Rights and Transferability

No participant will have any shareholder rights with respect to the shares subject to an option or stock appreciation right until such participant has exercised the option or stock appreciation right and paid the exercise price for the purchased shares, and any related withholding taxes. Subject to the terms of the applicable award agreement, a participant will have full shareholder rights with respect to any shares of common stock issued under the 2014 LTIP, whether or not his or her interest in those shares is vested. A participant will not have any shareholder rights with respect to the shares of common stock subject to a restricted stock unit, performance share or other share right award until that award vests and the shares of common stock are actually issued thereunder.

Awards are not assignable or transferable other than by will or the laws of inheritance or a domestic relations order. However, the plan administrator may structure one or more awards to be transferable during a participant’s lifetime to one or more members of the participant’s family or to an estate planning trust or charity.

Withholding

The plan administrator may provide holders of awards with the right to have us withhold cash or portion of the shares otherwise issuable to such individuals in satisfaction of the withholding taxes to which they become subject in connection with the exercise, vesting or settlement of the awards. Alternatively, the plan administrator may allow such individuals to deliver cash or previously acquired shares of our common stock in payment of such withholding tax liability.

Deferral Programs

The plan administrator may structure one or more awards so that the participants may be provided with an election to defer the compensation associated with those awards for federal income tax purposes.

Restrictive Covenants and Clawback

Awards granted under the 2014 LTIP will be subject to forfeiture and in certain cases the participant must return amounts received if the participant breaches non-solicitation or confidentiality covenants or engages in any misconduct that results in Caterpillar having to restate its financial statements.

Amendment and Termination

The plan administrator will have the discretionary authority at any time to amend or accelerate the vesting of any and all stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance awards, unless it would cause a performance-based award not to be deductible for income tax purposes under Section 162(m) of the Code.

The Committee may terminate, amend or modify the 2014 LTIP at any time, subject to any shareholder approval requirements under applicable law or regulation or pursuant to the listing standards of the stock exchange on which our shares of common stock are at the time primarily traded. No awards may be granted under the 2014 LTIP after June 11, 2024.


2017 Proxy Statement

 |57




Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the equity awards granted over the lifetime of the 2014 LTIP to the individuals and groups indicated, as of March 31, 2017.

NAME
POSITION
NUMBER OF STOCK OPTIONS     NUMBER OF RSUs
Douglas R. Oberhelman763,52594,421
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Jim Umpleby501,04072,249
Chief Executive Officer
Bradley M. Halverson348,26146,935
Group President and Chief Financial Officer 
Robert B. Charter348,45848,061
Group President
David P. Bozeman163,75519,706
Former Senior Vice President
All executive officers (8 persons)2,833,483 374,214
All non-executive directors (11 persons)51,267
All employees (other than current executive officers) (approximately 5,553 persons)14,884,6135,354,002

The closing price of our common stock on March 31, 2017 was $92.76

SUMMARY OF FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF AWARDS GRANTED UNDER THE 2014 LTIP

The following is a summary of the United States Federal income taxation treatment applicable to us and the participants who receive awards under the 2014 LTIP based on United States Federal income tax laws in effect as of the date of the filing of this proxy statement. This discussion does not address all aspects of the United States Federal income tax consequences of participating in the 2014 LTIP that may be relevant to participants in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances and does not discuss any state, local or non-United States tax consequences of participating in the 2014 LTIP. Each participant is advised to consult his or her particular tax advisor concerning the application of the United States Federal income tax laws to such participant’s particular situation, as well as the applicability and effect of any state, local or non-United States tax laws before taking any actions with respect to any awards.

Option Grants

Options granted under the 2014 LTIP may be either incentive stock options which satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or nonqualified options which are not intended to meet such requirements. The Federal income tax treatment for the two types of options differs as follows:

Incentive Stock Options.No taxable income is recognized by the participant at the time of the grant, and no taxable income is recognized for regular tax purposes at the time the option is exercised, although taxable income may arise upon exercise for alternative minimum tax purposes. The participant will recognize taxable income in the year in which the purchased shares are sold or otherwise made the subject of certain other dispositions. For Federal tax purposes, dispositions are divided into two categories: (i) qualifying, and (ii) disqualifying. A qualifying disposition occurs if the sale or other disposition is made more than two years after the date the related option was granted and more than one year after the date such option was exercised for those shares. If the sale or disposition occurs before both of these two periods are satisfied, then a disqualifying disposition will result.

Upon a qualifying disposition, the participant will recognize long-term capital gain in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the amount realized upon the sale or other disposition of the purchased shares over (ii) the exercise price paid for the shares. If there is a disqualifying disposition of the shares, then the excess of (i) the fair market value of those shares on the exercise date or (if less) the amount realized upon such sale or disposition over (ii) the exercise price paid for the shares will be taxable as ordinary income to the participant. Any additional gain recognized upon the disposition will be a capital gain. We will not be entitled to any income tax deduction if the participant makes a qualifying disposition of the shares.

If the participant makes a disqualifying disposition of the purchased shares, then we will be entitled to an income tax deduction, for the taxable year in which such disposition occurs, equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant as a result of the disposition. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder in connection with the disqualifying disposition.


58 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

Nonqualified Options.No taxable income is recognized by a participant upon the grant of a nonqualified option. The participant will recognize ordinary income in the year in which the option is exercised, equal to the excess of the fair market value of the purchased shares on the exercise date over the exercise price paid for the shares (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee). We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant with respect to the exercised nonqualified option.

Stock Appreciation Rights

No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of a stock appreciation right. The holder will recognize ordinary income in the year in which the stock appreciation right is exercised, in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares issued to the holder or the amount of the cash payment made to the holder (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee). We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder in connection with the exercise of the stock appreciation right.

Restricted Stock Awards

No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of restricted stock, unless the participant makes an election to be taxed at the time of grant. If such election is made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of the grant in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for those shares. If such election is not made, the holder will recognize ordinary income when those shares subsequently vest in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date over the amount, if any, paid for the shares (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee). Subject to the deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m), we will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the recipient with respect to the restricted stock award. The deduction will be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized by the recipient. In addition, a participant receiving dividends with respect to restricted stock for which the above-described election has not been made and prior to the time the restrictions lapse will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee), rather than dividend income, in an amount equal to the dividends paid and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of Code Section 162(m) apply.

Restricted Stock Units or Performance Shares

No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of restricted stock units or performance shares. The holder will recognize ordinary income in the year in which the shares subject to the awards are actually issued to the holder or a dividend equivalent is paid to the holder, in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares on the issuance date and the amount of any cash on the payment date (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee). Subject to the deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m), we will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder at the time the shares are issued.

Cash Awards

The payment of a cash award will result in the recipient’s recognition of ordinary income equal to the dollar amount received (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee). Subject to the deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m), we will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the recipient.

Future awards under the 2014 Plan are in the discretion of the Committee and are therefore not determinable at this time.


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
(AS OF MARCH 31, 2017)

PLAN CATEGORY

(A)
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
TO BE ISSUED UPON
EXERCISE OF OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND
RIGHTS (1)

  

(B)
WEIGHTED- AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE
OF OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS, WARRANTS
AND RIGHTS

  

(C)
NUMBER OF SECURITIES REMAINING
AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE
UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION
PLANS (EXCLUDING SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 36,362,948   $84.73   11,434,997   
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders N/A   N/A   N/A 
Total 36,362,948 $84.73 11,434,997 

1 Excludes any cash payments in-lieu-of stock.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |59




Table of Contents

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Some of the following shareholder proposals contain assertions that we believe are incorrect or do not reflect all of the facts related to these issues. We have not attempted to refute all inaccuracies.

PROPOSAL 6 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – PROVIDE A REPORT OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT

What am I voting on?

Shareholders are being asked to vote on a shareholder proposal calling for additional disclosure of Caterpillar’s lobbying activity.

Who submitted the proposal?

The proposal was submitted by Fonds de solidarite des travailleurstravaileurs du Quebec (FTQ), 545 boulevard CremazieCrémazie Est, Bureau 200, Montreal (Quebec)Montréal (Québec) H2M 2W4, who has represented that it is the owner of 33,00044,100 shares of Caterpillar Inc. common stock. The proposal was also submitted by four other co-filers. Pursuant to Rule 14a-8(I)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company will provide the name, address and number of Company securities held by the co-filers of this shareholder proposal promptly upon receipt of a written or oral request.

Board Voting Recommendation:

AGAINST proposal

PROPOSALCaterpillar Inc. is not responsible for the content of this shareholder proposal or supporting statement.


PROPOSAL 6 — LOBBYING REPORT

PROPOSAL4PROVIDEAREPORTOFLOBBYINGACTIVITIES

Whereas,, we believe in full disclosure of Caterpillar’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether Caterpillar’s lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and in thestockholders’ best interests of stockholders.interests.

Resolved,, the stockholders of Caterpillar request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:

1. Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.
2.Payments by Caterpillar used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.
3.Caterpillar’s membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.
4.Description of management’s and the Board’s decision making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

1. Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.

2. Payments by Caterpillar used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.

3. Caterpillar’s membership in payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

4. Description of management’s and the Board’s decision-making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which Caterpillar is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the AuditPublic Policy and Governance Committee or other relevant oversight committees and posted on Caterpillar’s website.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

As stockholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in Caterpillar’s use of corporate funds to influence legislation and regulation.

SUPPORTINGSTATEMENT

Caterpillar spent $11.83 million in 2014 and 2015$36,380,000 from 2010 - 2018 on federal lobbying (opensecrets.org). These figures dolobbying. This does not include state lobbying expenditures, where Caterpillar also lobbies. Caterpillar’s

60 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

lobbies but disclosure is uneven or absent. For example, Caterpillar spent $547,756 on lobbying in California from 2010 - 2018. Caterpillar also lobbies abroad, spending between €200,000-299,000 on Cuba trade has attracted media attention (“Illinois Business: Let’s Make a Cuba Deal,” Chicago Tribune, October 16, 2016), as has its lobbying on the Export-Import Bank (“Caterpillar Cranks up Lobbying to Save Ex-Im Bank,” Wall Street Journal, June 26, 2014).in Europe for 2018.

Caterpillar serves on the board ofbelongs to the Chamber of Commerce, which has spent over $1.2$1.5 billion on lobbying since 1998. Caterpillar is also a member of

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    52


Back to Contents

belongs to the Business Roundtable and National Association of Manufacturers, and Business Roundtable, which together spent $63.45over $68 million on lobbying for 20142017 and 2015.2018 and are lobbying against shareholder rights to file resolutions. Caterpillar does not disclose its payments to trade associations or the amounts used for lobbying. NorAnd Caterpillar does Caterpillarnot disclose its contributions tomembership in tax-exempt organizations that writeandwrite and endorse model legislation, such as its support for the American Legislative Exchange CouncilCounsel (ALEC). Over

We are concerned that Caterpillar’s lack of disclosure presents reputational risks when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, Caterpillar’s corporate ALEC membership has drawn scrutiny,(1) and over 100 companies have publicly left ALEC, including 3M, Deere, IntelALEC. And Caterpillar uses the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) for sustainability reporting, yet currently fails to report “any differences between its lobbying positions and Walgreens.any stated policies, goals, or other public positions” under GRI Standard 415.

Transparent reporting would reveal whether company assets are being used for objectives contraryWe believe the reputational damage stemming from this misalignment between general policy positions and actual direct and indirect lobbying efforts harms long-term value creation by Caterpillar. Thus, we urge Caterpillar to Caterpillar’s long-term interests. For example, Caterpillar supports greenhouse gas policy change through memberships in trade andexpand its lobbying associations (“Committed to Coal,” World Coal, September 16, 2016), yet the Chamber has sued to block the EPA Clean Power Plan to address climate change. We are concerned that Caterpillar’s current lack of disclosure presents reputational risk.disclosure.

COMPANY RESPONSE

COMPANY RESPONSE

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons provided below.below:

Caterpillar’stransparencyandcurrentdisclosuresregardingitslobbyingexpendituresandpoliticalactivitiesprovideourshareholderswithextensiveinformationonourlobbyingandpoliticalactivities.

Caterpillar believes that transparency in its lobbying expenditures and political activities is important and, therefore, provides both required and voluntary disclosures with respect to its lobbying expenditures and political activities. Caterpillar regularly reviews its disclosures relating to political activity and believes these disclosures are aligned with, and in some instances, exceed those of its peers. Therefore, the Board does not believe that the additional detailed disclosures contemplated by this proposal would be beneficial to shareholders.

Caterpillar files required federal Lobbying Disclosure Act reports with Congress. These reports are publicly available at http://disclosures.house.gov and provide Caterpillar’s federal lobbying activities and expenses for the preceding quarter as well as contributions to candidates by the Caterpillar Political Action Committee on a semiannual basis. These reports include Caterpillar’s total federal lobbying expenditures, the issue that was the topic of communication, disclosure of the Caterpillar individuals who act as lobbyists on behalf of Caterpillar and identification of the legislative body or executive branch agency that was contacted.

In the European Union, Caterpillar voluntarily participates in the Transparency Register operated by the European Parliament and the European Commission. Through this publicly available resource available at https://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister, Caterpillar discloses its engagement with policymakers in the European Union regarding issues of interest to Caterpillar’s business and reports such information as its membership in trade associations and annual expenses associated with activities identified in the Register. Caterpillar also voluntarily reports each US. trade association that has received more than $50,000 from Caterpillar in the most recently completed year. Caterpillar participates in organizations that represent industries relevant to our business and that work on issues that align with the Company’s top priorities. These organizations may also represent other industries and interests not relevant to Caterpillar, and the organizations and their other members may take positions with which we do not always agree.

Caterpillar posts information about political expenditures by Caterpillar and disbursements by Caterpillar’s Political Action Committee and describes policies and procedures for Company political contributions. In addition, Caterpillar makes voluntary disclosures regarding issues of global importance to the Company, including detailed information on the Company’s position with respect to such issues. All such policies and voluntary reports are available on Caterpillar’s website at www.caterpillar.com/en/company/governance/
political-engagement.html.

Caterpillar’sgovernancepoliciesprovideforeffectiveoversightofitspoliticalactivities.

Caterpillar’s political and advocacy activities at both the state, federal and federalinternational levels are managed by the Vice President, Global Government & Corporate Affairs who coordinates and reviews with senior management the legislative and regulatory priorities that are significant to the Company’s business and shareholders, as well as related advocacy activities. To ensure appropriate Board oversight of political activities, the Board’s Public Policy and Governance Committee receives regular briefingsreviews the Company’s policy on political activities and contributions and Caterpillar’s significant political activities, including corporate political contributions, political contribution activities of the Company’sCaterpillar Political Action Committee, trade association participation and Caterpillar’s legislative and regulatory priorities,priorities.

The Board believes that existing disclosures meet or exceed any legal requirements and provide shareholders with transparency and visibility into the Company’s political spending and trade association expenditures as well as theengagement activities of Caterpillar’s Political Action Committee.

Caterpillar belongs to a number of trade associations representing the interests of the manufacturing industry. These organizations work to represent the industry and advocate on major policy issues of importance to Caterpillar and its customers. Caterpillar’s participation as a membermanagement and oversight of any trade association comes with the understanding that we may not always agree with all of the positions of the organization or other members. Each quarter Caterpillar discloses in apublicly available report the Company’s total federal lobbying expenditures for the quarter which includes the portion of all trade association payments that are used for lobbying. To provide greater transparency regarding Caterpillar’s trade association memberships, Caterpillar voluntarily reports on its website each trade association that engages in lobbying and other political activity that has received more than $50,000 from Caterpillar in the most recently completed year. In addition, Caterpillar makes additional voluntary website disclosures regarding its engagement in public policy issues, political contributions and global issues of importance to the Company, including detailed information on the Company’s position with respect to such issues.

With a view toward providing greater transparency, the Company in 2016 updated its website disclosures relating to political activity. The Company believes its disclosures related to political activity are aligned with, and in other instances exceed, its peers.

them. The Board does not believe that additional detailed disclosure of these amounts as contemplated by this proposaldisclosures would be beneficial to shareholders.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |61


(1)

https://www.prwatch.org/news/2018/05/13346/take-money-and-run-trump-tax-cuts-boost-earnigs-alec-corps-which-promptly-layoff

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    53


Back to Contents




Table of ContentsPROPOSAL 5

PROPOSAL 7 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – DECREASE PERCENT OF OWNERSHIP REQUIRED TO CALL SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGINDEPENDENT BOARD CHAIRMAN

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT

What am I voting on?

Shareholders are being asked to vote on a proposal that asks the Board of Directors to adopt a policy that would give holders inrequire the aggregateChairman of 15 percent of our outstanding common stock the powerBoard to call a special shareholder meeting.be an independent director whenever possible.

Who submitted the proposal?

The proposal was submitted by John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278 who has represented that he is the owner of 100 shares of Caterpillar Inc. Common Stock.

Board Voting Recommendation:

 AGAINST proposal

Caterpillar is not responsible for the content of this shareholder proposal or the supporting statement.

PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL5INDEPENDENTBOARDCHAIRMAN

Shareholders request our Board of Directors adopt as policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require that the Chairman of the Board be an independent member of the Board whenever possible. Although it would be better to have an immediate transition to an independent Board Chairman, the Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next Chief Executive Officer transition.

If the Board determines that a Chairman, who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chairman who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived in the unlikely event that no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chairman. This proposal requests that each necessary step be taken to accomplish the above.

Boeing is an example of a company changing course and naming an independent board chairman in October 2019. Boeing did not wait for the next CEO succession.

Boeing then named David Calhoun (the Caterpillar Lead Director) as Boeing CEO in December 2019. Mr. Calhoun may have too much on his plate to serve any longer at Caterpillar given the current Boeing 737 MAX crisis. Plus Dennis Muilenburg’s reputation may be too tarnished for him to continue serve as a respected director on the Caterpillar Board. An independent Board Chairman would have more time to focus on whether it is prudent to retain Mr. Calhoun, Mr. Muilenburg and Susan Schwab, another Boeing director, on the Caterpillar Board. Association with Boeing does not seem to be good at least for the immediate future.

Regarding Mr. Calhoun, Ralph Nader, whose grandniece died in the Ethiopia Boeing 737 MAX crash said: “There is no way he can do this job and do all those other jobs.” Mr. Calhoun may also still be Chairman at Gates Industrial Corp (GTES).

This proposal topic also won impressive 42%-support at the Caterpillar 2016 annual meeting. This 42%-support would have been higher (perhaps 47%) if more shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice.

Please vote yes:

Independent Board Chairman - Proposal 5

COMPANY RESPONSE

After careful consideration, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons provided below:

TheBoardshouldbeabletoselectitsleadershipstructureincludingitsChairmanandCEOandbaseduponitsdeterminationofthestructurethatbestservestheinterestsofshareholders.

We operate in a highly cyclical and often challenging macro-economic operating environment in which our Board must constantly assess industry change and disruption. Our Board is comprised of directors with diverse backgrounds,

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    54


Back to Contents

experience, perspectives and in-depth knowledge about Caterpillar. With this expertise, our Board is uniquely positioned to evaluate Caterpillar’s key challenges and needs, including the optimal leadership structure. The Board elects the Chairman & CEO annually, and, as part of the election process, considers whether to elect the Chairman & CEO or an independent director to serve as Chairman. This flexibility allows the Board the ability to choose the optimal leadership for Caterpillar based on Caterpillar’s needs and circumstances at a particular time rather than pursuant to an inflexible policy established in advance. In the past, the Board has chosen to separate the roles based on such needs and circumstances. The Board currently believes it is in the best interests of Caterpillar and our shareholders for the roles to be combined. Moreover, the Board believes the combined role of Chairman and CEO promotes unified leadership and direction for the Company, which allows for a single, clear focus for management to execute our strategy and business plans. This ensures that the Company is represented by a single voice to dealers, customers, shareholders, employees and other stakeholders.

The Board believes in maintaining flexibility with respect to its leadership structure and that a fixed policy requiring a separation of the roles of Chairman and CEO would not benefit Caterpillar or its shareholders.

Caterpillar has strong governance practices to ensure independent oversight of the Chairman & CEO and management.

The Board recognizes the importance of independent oversight of the Chairman & CEO and management and has already implemented structures and practices to enhance this oversight. In the event that the Chairman is not an independent director, then an independent director is elected to serve as the Presiding Director. Such independent Presiding Director has duties and responsibilities such as:

Presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman & CEO is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors;

Serving as a liaison between the Chairman & CEO and the independent directors;

Approving the type of information sent to the Board;

Approving meeting agendas for the Board;

Approving meeting schedules, in consultation with the Chairman & CEO and the independent directors, to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;

Having the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;

If requested by major shareholders, being available for consultation and direct communication; and

Providing the Chairman & CEO with the results of the annual performance review in conjunction with the chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee.

As part of each Board meeting, the independent directors meet in executive session with no members of management present. During this time, they consider any matters they determine to be appropriate, including evaluation of senior management, Chairman & CEO and management succession.

Moreover, Caterpillar’s strong corporate governance practices negate the need for a fixed policy requiring the separation of the roles of Chairman and CEO. Such structures and practices include:

With the exception of Mr. Umpleby, all of Caterpillar’s current directors are independent;

Annual election of all directors by majority vote;

Proxy access;

Shareholders’ right to call a special meeting;

Director access to senior management;

Annual self-evaluations of the Board, its Committees and its Chairman & CEO; and

Publicly available Corporate Governance Guidelines that are reviewed on an annual basis.

Given the strong leadership of the Company’s Chairman & CEO, the counter-balancing role of the Presiding Director and a Board comprised of strong and independent directors, the Board continues to believe it is in the best long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders to maintain the combined role of Chairman and CEO.

For additional information regarding the Board’s views on its leadership structure and why it is best suited for Caterpillar at this time, we encourage shareholders to read the “Board Election and Leadership Structure” and “Duties and Responsibilities of Presiding Director” sections of this proxy, on pages 19 and 20.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    55


Back to Contents

PROPOSAL 6– SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – SHAREHOLDER ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT

PROPOSAL SNAPSHOT

What am I voting on?

Shareholders are being asked to vote on a proposal that will allow shareholders to take action without a meeting if a specified number of shareholders consent to the action in writing.

Who submitted the proposal?

The proposal was submitted by Myra K. Young, 9295 Yorkship Court, Elk Grove, CA 95758, who has represented that she is the owner of 50 shares of Caterpillar Inc. common stock.Common Stock.

Board Voting Recommendation:

 AGAINST proposal

PROPOSALCaterpillar is not responsible for the content of this shareholder proposal or the supporting statement.

PROPOSAL 7

PROPOSAL6 SPECIAL SHAREOWNER MEETINGSRIGHTTOACTBYWRITTENCONSENT

Resolved, Shareowners askCaterpillar, Inc. (“CAT” or “Company”) shareholders request our board of directors undertake steps as necessary to takepermit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the stepsminimum number of votes necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylawsauthorize action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote were present and each appropriate governing documentvoting. This written consent is to give holders inbe consistent with giving shareholders the aggregate of 15% of our outstanding common stock thefullest power to callact by written consent consistent with applicable law, including the ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

SUPPORTINGSTATEMENT

Shareholder rights to act by written consent and special meetings are often complimentary ways to bring urgent matters to the attention of management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle.

Many boards and investors assume a false equivalency between rights of written consent and special shareowner meeting. This proposal does not impact our board’s current powermeetings. However, any shareholder, regardless how many (or few) shares she owns, can seek to callsolicit written consents on a special meeting.proposal.

Dozens of Fortune 500 companies allow 10% of shares to callBy contrast, calling a special meeting and this proposalmay require a two-step process. A shareholder who does not own the minimum shares required must first obtain the support of other shareholders. Once that meeting is onlycalled, the shareholder must distribute proxies asking that 15% of our shares be enabled to call a special meeting. Special meetings allow shareownersshareholders to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors that can arise between annualmeetings. Shareowner input on the timing of shareowner meetings is especially important when events unfold quickly and issues may become moot byproposal to be presented at the next annualspecial meeting. This is important because there could be 15-months ortwo-step process can take more between annual meetings.time and expense than the one-step process of soliciting written consents, especially when CAT requires a 25% threshold, instead of 10% as provided for in Delaware law.

This proposal is particularly important because we do notBlackRock’s proxy voting guidelines for 2019 include the following:

In exceptional circumstances and with sufficiently broad support, shareholders should have the opportunity to actraise issues of substantial importance without having to wait for management to schedule a meeting. We therefore believe that shareholders should have the right to solicit votes by written consent provided that: 1) there are reasonable requirements to initiate the consent solicitation process (in order to avoid the waste of corporate resources in addressing narrowly supported interests); and 2) shareholders receive a minimum of 50% of outstanding shares to effectuate the action by written consent. More than 100 Fortune 500

This proposal topic is trending positively. Written consent won 47% support at United Rentals in 2018; 51% support in 2019. At Flowserve 43% support in 2018; 51% support in 2019. At Capital One Financial 44% support in 2018; 56% support in 2019. The topic also recently won majorities at JetBlue, Cigna, Applied Materials, Nuance Communications, Netflix, Newell Brands, Gilead Sciences, L3 Technologies, Eastern Chemical Company, Kansas City Southern and HP.

Our Company should join the hundreds of major companies provide forthat enable shareholders to call special meetings and to act by written consent. If our management adopts this proposal it will be one sign that management values our shareholder input.

Please voteIncrease Shareholder Value

Vote for Right to enhance shareholder value:Act by Written Consent - Proposal 6

Special Shareowner Meetings — Proposal 7

COMPANY RESPONSE

The 2020 PROXY STATEMENT    56


Back to Contents

COMPANY RESPONSE

After careful consideration, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons provided below.below:

Caterpillar’s bylaws currently provide that persons collectively holding at least 25 percent of the Company’s common stock may call a special meeting upon written request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The current threshold is designed to strike a balance between assuring that shareholders have the ability to call a special meeting and protecting against the risk that a small minority of shareholders, including those with special interests, could trigger the expense and distraction of a special meeting to pursue matters that are not widely viewed as requiring immediate attention or for reasons that may not be in the best interests of the Company or all of our shareholders. The Company’s current threshold is well within the mainstream.

Caterpillar continues to view direct shareholder engagement as key to the Company’s success. To that end, Caterpillar leaders meet regularly with shareholders to discuss our strategy, operational performance, and business practices. We also meet with shareholders throughout the year to share perspectives on corporate governance and executive compensation matters. This commitment to ongoing dialogue with our shareholders, together with practices such as annual director elections, majority voting for directors, a “proxy access” right for nominating directors, no supermajority voting provisions and shareholders’ existing right to call special meetings, protects shareholder rights without the expense and risk associated with a lower special meeting threshold.

62 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 8 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – PROVIDE A REPORT OF LOBBYING PRIORITIESAction

bywrittenconsentcouldcircumventtheprocessofashareholdermeeting.What am I voting on?
Shareholders are being asked to vote on a proposal that requests the Company to report to shareholders on the Company’s process for identifying and prioritizing legislative and regulatory public policy advocacy activities.

Who submitted the proposal?
The proposal was submitted by the National Center for Public Policy Research, 20 F Street, NW Suite 700, Washington, DC 20001 who has represented that it is the owner of 71 shares of Caterpillar Inc. common stock.

Voting Recommendation:
AGAINST
proposal

PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL 8 — LOBBYING PRIORITIES

Whereas:

Caterpillar Inc.’s primary duty is to create shareholder value. The Company should pursue legal and ethical means to achieve that goal, including identifying and advocating legislative and regulatory public policies that would advance Company interests and shareholder value.

Resolved: The proponent requests that the Board of Directors, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, report to shareholders on the Company’s process for identifying and prioritizing legislative and regulatory public policy advocacy activities. The report should:

1.Describe the process by which the Company identifies, evaluates and prioritizes public policy issues of interest to the Company;
2.Identify and describe public policy issues of interest to the Company;
3.Prioritize the issues by importance to creating shareholder value; and
4.Explain the business rationale for prioritization.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:

If the Company chooses, the Board might consider disclosing in its report what actions federal, state and local governments might take to assist the Company’s ability to thrive and create value for the Company, its investors and its workforce.

Corporate America has in recently faced unprecedented challenges in the form of increased regulation and taxation combined with demands from special interest groups with little, if any, interest in creating either shareholder value or opportunities for the Company to grow, create jobs and add wealth to the communities in which the Company operates.

Today’s changing political climate offers a unique opportunity for corporations to once again thrive in America. Analysts have concluded that very many newly-elected officeholders intend to make improving conditions for business growth to be a high priority of their terms of office.

The pursuit of shareholder value in a lawful manner is a social good.

Shareholders hope the Company will not be passive in the face of this opportunity. If the Company chooses, without exposing proprietary or otherwise confidential information that could make it less competitive or otherwise harm the Company, it may consider communicating to elective officials, regulators, the news media, and or the public at-large what policies would best help the Company, and through it, the communities it serves, thrive.

If it chooses, the Company might also consider developing plans to defend assaults on the Company and to defend the Company’s decisions, when the Company chooses to make them, to not to be involved in political or social change campaigns that are outside the Company’s interests.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |63




Table of Contents

COMPANY RESPONSE

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons provided below.

The Board believes that it isshareholder action by written consent can be used to circumvent the important deliberative process of a shareholder meeting. Written consent rights as proposed could deprive many shareholders of the opportunity to deliberate in an open and transparent manner, or even receive accurate and complete information on important pending actions. In addition, permitting shareholder action by written consent can create substantial confusion and disruption for shareholders, as multiple shareholder groups could solicit multiple written consents simultaneously, some of which may be duplicative or contradictory.

Allshareholdersshouldhaveanopportunitytodebateactions.

The Board believes that all shareholders should have the opportunity to deliberate and vote on pending shareholder actions. Therefore, shareholders should generally act only in the Company’s best interests to be involved in and contribute to the legislative and regulatory process.context of an annual or special meeting. To that end, the Company engagesCompany’s organizational documents allow holders of 25 percent or more, in lobbyingthe aggregate, of Caterpillar’s shares to call a special shareholder meeting. This practice allows our shareholders to bring important matters before all shareholders for consideration, while providing the Board with an adequate opportunity to examine any proposed action and other political activities, as permitted by applicable law,provide a carefully considered recommendation to further priorities that are significant to the Company’s business andour shareholders. Caterpillar’s political and advocacy activities, at both the state and federal levels, are managed by the Vice President, Global Government & Corporate Affairs who coordinates and reviews with senior management the legislative and regulatory priorities that are significant to the Company’s business and shareholders, as well as related advocacy activities. To ensure appropriate Board oversight of political activities, the Board’s Public Policy and Governance Committee receives regular briefings on the Company’s legislative and regulatory priorities.

Each quarter Caterpillar discloses in a publicly available report the Company’s total federal lobbying expenditures for the quarter which includes a description of the issues addressed by these lobbying activities. Caterpillar also identifies on its website global issues of importance toIn addition, the Company and has provided detailed information on the Company’s position with respectafforded shareholders numerous ways to some of these issues. Accordingly, much of the information requested by the proponent is already publicly available.

The proponent requests that the proposed report not only disclose the public policies of interest to the Company, but also the priority of such policies and the business rationale for such priority. Because parties with interests adverse to us also lobby for legislative and regulatory changes, the unilateral disclosure of this information could benefit these parties and our competitors and cause strategic harm to us.

64 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 9 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – INCLUDE SUSTAINABILITY AS A PERFORMANCE METRIC UNDER EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLANS

What am I voting on?
Shareholders are being asked to vote on a proposal that requests the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to include sustainability as one of the performance measures for senior  executives under the Company’s incentive plans.

Who submitted the proposal?
The proposal was submitted by Heartland Initiative, Inc., 174 Carroll Street SE, Atlanta, GA 30312 who has represented that it is the owner of 62 shares of Caterpillar Inc. common stock.

Voting Recommendation:
AGAINST
proposal

PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL 9 — SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE METRIC

RESOLVED: That the shareholders of Caterpillar request the Board’s Compensation Committee, when setting senior executive compensation, include sustainability as one of the performance measures for senior executives under the Company’s incentive plans. Sustainability is defined as how environmental and social considerations, and related financial impacts, are integrated into corporate strategy over the long term.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT: We believe that the long-term interests of shareholders, as well as other important constituents, are best served by companies that operate their businesses in a sustainable manner focused on long-term value creation. As the recent financial crisis demonstrates, those boards of directors and management that operate their companies with integrity and a focus on the long term are much more likely to prosper than ones that are dominated by a short-term focus.

The best means of demonstrating a company’s commitment to the concept of sustainability is through incorporating it as a performance measure in the Company’s annual and/or long-term incentive plans. We believe that the current failure to do so represents a serious shortcoming.

While the compensation committee has the discretion to choose the specific metrics, sustainability metrics may include evaluation of how company activities and products are affecting environmental pollution, natural resource exploitation, indigenous rights of access and control of land, other human rights considerations, and other appropriate issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainability.

In support of the principle that the integration of sustainability standards into corporate strategies serves the long-term interests of shareholders, we note the following findings:

A 2012 Harvard Business School study concluded that firms that adopted social and environmental policies significantly outperformed counterparts over the long-term, in terms of stock market and accounting performance.

The Glass Lewis report In Depth: Linking Executive Pay to Sustainability (2016), finds a “mounting body of research showing that firms that operate in a more responsible manner may perform better financially.... Moreover, these companies were also more likely to tie top executive incentives to sustainability metrics.”


2017 Proxy Statement

 |65




Table of Contents

COMPANY RESPONSE

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons provided below.

The Board agrees that the interests of shareholders are best served by companies that operate their business in a sustainable manner. Indeed, sustainability is one of Caterpillar’s five core values. Caterpillar was named to the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices in 2016, recognizing Caterpillar’s sustainability performance to be in the top ten percent of our industry.

The Compensation Committee of our Board has crafted an incentive compensation program structured around financial and operational performance measures thatthe committee believes are most important in driving the responsible, long-term growth of our business. Achievement of these performance measures is enhanced by reducing environmental impacts of operations, providing customers with products with best-in-class fuel efficiency and productivity and further strengthening our positive corporate image. Requiring the Compensation Committee to include a specific sustainability performance measure is unnecessary and interferes with the Compensation Committee’s discretion to design and monitor an effective executive compensation program that is responsive to business goals and market conditions.

66 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 10 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – AMEND THE COMPANY’S COMPENSATION CLAWBACK POLICY

What am I voting on?
Shareholders are being asked to vote on a proposal that requests the Board of Directors to amend the Company’s compensation clawback policy to include any misconduct or oversight failure that causes significant financial or reputational harm.

Who submitted the proposal?
The proposal was submitted by CtW Investment Group, 1900 L St. NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036 who has represented that it is the owner of 32 shares of Caterpillar Inc. common stock.

Voting Recommendation:
AGAINST
proposal

PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL 10 — AMEND CLAWBACK POLICY

RESOLVED, that shareholders of Caterpillar Inc. (the “Company”) urge the Compensation and Human Resource Committeecontact members of the Board and share thoughts, opinions and concerns about the Company.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    57


Back to Contents

OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION

MATTERSRAISEDATTHEANNUALMEETINGNOTINCLUDEDINTHISSTATEMENT

We do not know of Directors (the “Committee”)any matters to amendbe acted upon at the Company’s clawback policy2020 Annual Meeting other than those discussed in this statement. If any other matter is properly presented, proxy holders will vote on the matter in their discretion.

SHAREHOLDERPROPOSALSANDDIRECTORNOMINATIONSFORTHE2021ANNUALMEETING

A proposal for action or the nomination of a director to provide thatbe presented by any shareholder at the Committee will (a) review, and determine whether to seek recoupment2021 annual meeting of incentive compensation paid, granted or awarded to a senior executive if,shareholders must be delivered in the Committee’s judgment, (i) there has been conduct resultingmanner and accompanied by the information required in our bylaws.

Rule14a-8proposals:If the proposal is to be included in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the proposal must be received at the office of the Corporate Secretary on or before January 1, 2021.

Proposalsornominationsnottobeincludedinourproxy:If the proposal or the nomination of a material violation of law or Company policy that causes significant financial or reputational harmdirector is not to Company, and (ii) the senior executive engaged in such conduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor conduct or risks; and (b) disclose the circumstances of any recoupment if (i) required by law or regulation or (ii) the Committee determines that disclosure isbe included in the best interests of Company and its shareholders.

“Recoupment” is (a) recovery of compensation already paid and (b) forfeiture, recapture, reduction or cancellation of amounts awarded or granted over which Valeant retains control. These amendments should operate prospectively andproxy statement, the proposal must be implemented so as not to violate any contract, compensation plan, law or regulation.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

As long-term shareholders, we believe that compensation policies should promote sustainable value creation. We agree with former GE general counsel Ben Heineman Jr. that recoupment policies are “a powerful mechanism forholding senior leadership accountable toreceived at the fundamental missionoffice of the corporation: proper risk taking balanced with proper risk managementCorporate Secretary no earlier than February 10, 2021, and no later than April 11, 2021.

Proxyaccessnominations:If the robust fusion of high performance with high integrity.” (http//:blogs.law. harvard.edu/corpgov/20 10/08/1 3/making-sense-out-of-clawbacks/)

Caterpillar has adopted a policy allowing recoupment of certain incentive pay from a corporate officer as a result of a restatement of financial results, taking into account, among other things, whether the incentive award would have been lower based on the restated results. In our view, providing for recoupment only for accounting and financial reporting noncomplianceproposal is too narrow. We believe that recoupment is an important remedy for other kinds of conduct that may not cause a restatement, but may harm Caterpillar’s reputation and prospects. As well, it may be appropriate to hold accountable a senior executive who did not commit misconduct but who failed in his or her management or monitoring responsibility.

Recent legal settlements underscore the need for a stronger policy in this area, notably Caterpillar’s agreement to pay over $2.5 million in 2011 to settle alleged Clean Air Act violations for shipping more than 590,000 highway and non-road diesel engines without the correct emissions controls and alleged failure to comply with emission control reporting and engine-labeling requirements (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/08/caterpillar-inc-us-environmental-protection-agency-pentality-fine-clean-air-act.html). The Company also recently finalized a $60 million class action settlement related to possible defects in the Company’s emission control system for certain heavy duty diesel

2017 Proxy Statement

 |67




Table of Contents

engines. (http://www.pjstar.com/news/20161202/caterpillar-settles-truck-engine-suit-for-60-million). Such lawsuits have the potential to harm the Company’s reputation and goodwill,however, there is no indication that the Company scrutinized these issues and whether a recoupment of incentive compensation by the senior officers involved is warranted.

COMPANY RESPONSE

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons provided below.

Thisnomination of directors to be included in our proxy statement pursuant to proxy access under Article II, Section 4 of Caterpillar’s bylaws, the proposal is unnecessary becausemust be received at the Company has already adopted a customary and robust executive compensation clawback policy. Our current clawback policy allows the Compensation Committee to recoup cash and equity incentive compensation from officers if their conduct contributed to an accounting restatement. The policy provides the Compensation Committee with discretion to ensure that recoupment would be in the best interestsoffice of the Company, but avoids the vagueCorporate Secretary no earlier than December 2, 2020, and subjective standards advocated by this proposal. The Company’s current compensation structureno later than January 1, 2021.

Our bylaws are available on our website at www.caterpillar.com/governance. Shareholder proposals, director nominations and recoupment tools strike the right balance to motivate executives to deliver long-term results, while at the same time discouraging inappropriate behavior.

The proponent’s amendment would introduce vague and imprecise standards into the recoupment process by requiring recoupment if there has been conduct resulting in a “violationof law or Company policy that causes significant financial or reputational harm to the Company” or if he or she “failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor conduct or risks.” There is no definition or measurable standardrequests for what conduct qualifies or for calculating the recoupment amount resulting from such harm. The proposed amendment would undermine the effectivenesscopies of our performance-based compensation by introducing the type of discretionary, subjective evaluations that we have sought to avoid under our performance-based programs.

Requiring public disclosure of all recoupment action could be harmful. SEC rules already require disclosure of recoupment action taken against our CEO, CFO and other named executive officers. Disclosure of recoupment action impacting other officersbylaws should be at the Board’s discretion in orderdelivered to balance investors’ interest in receiving the information with applicable legal, commercial CaterpillarInc.c/oChiefLegalOfficer,GeneralCounseland privacy concerns.CorporateSecretary,510LakeCookRoad,Suite100,Deerfield,IL60015.

68 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 11 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – ADOPT A PERMANENT POLICY THAT THE CHAIRMAN BE INDEPENDENT

What am I voting on?
Shareholders are being asked to vote on a proposal that requests the Board of Directors to adopt a permanent policy that would require, whenever possible, the Chairman of the Board to be an independent director.

Who submitted the proposal?
The proposal was submitted by John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278 who has represented that he is the owner of 200 shares of Caterpillar Inc. common stock.

Voting Recommendation:
AGAINST
proposal

PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL 11 — INDEPENDENT BOARD CHAIRMAN

Shareholders request our Board of Directors to adopt as permanent policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require the Chair of the Board of Directors, whenever possible, to be an independent member of the Board. The Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next CEO transition, implemented so it does not violate any existing agreement. If the Board determines that a Chair who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chair who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chair. This proposal requests that all the necessary steps be taken to accomplish the above.

Caterpillar reversed itself by temporarily naming an independent board chairman in October 2016. Caterpillar had opposed a shareholder proposal for an independent board chairman as recently as its June 2016 annual meeting. Wells Fargo also reversed itself and named an independent board chairman in October 2016.

According to Institutional Shareholder Services 53% of the Standard & Poors 1,500 firms separate these 2 positions —“2015 Board Practices,” April 12, 2015. This proposal topic won 50%-plus support at 5 major U.S. companies in 2013 including 73%-support at Netflix.

It is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to protect shareholders’ long-term interests by providing independent oversight of management. By setting agendas, priorities and procedures, the Chairman is critical in shaping the work of the Board.

Having a board chairman who is independent of management is a practice that will promote greater management accountability to shareholders and lead to a more objective evaluation of management.

A number of institutional investors said that a strong, objective board leader can best provide the necessary oversight of management. Thus, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System’s Global Principles of Accountable Corporate Governance recommends that a company’s board should be chaired by an independent director, as does the Council of Institutional Investors. An independent director serving as chairman can help ensure the functioning of an effective board.

Please vote to enhance shareholder value:

Independent Board Chairman — Proposal 11

2017 Proxy Statement

 |69




Table of Contents

COMPANY RESPONSE

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons provided below.

In recent times, the role of Caterpillar’s Chairman has been filled by an independent director, the current CEO and a former CEO. In each case, the decision was made by the independent directors based on all relevant factors. The Board’s Guidelines on Corporate Governance Issues provide that the Board will regularly evaluate the Board leadership structure. Currently the Chairman is an independent director. The Board believes that it should choose a Board leadership structure based on the facts and circumstancesat any particular time. The Board’s guidelines provide that if the Chairman is not an independent director, then an independent director will serve as the Presiding Director with the following duties and responsibilities: (i) presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present; (ii) serving as a liaison between the CEO and the independent directors; (iii) approving information sent to the Board; (iv) approving meeting agendas for the Board; (v) approving meeting schedules to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion; (vi) authority to call meetings of the independent directors; and (vii) being available for consultation and direct communication with major shareholders.

70 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION

PERSONS OWNING MORE THAN FIVE PERCENT OF CATERPILLAR COMMON STOCK

The following table lists those persons or groups (based on a review of Schedule 13Gs filed with the SEC) who beneficially own more than five percent of Caterpillar common stock as of December 31, 2016.2019:


VOTING AUTHORITY
DISPOSITIVE AUTHORITYTOTAL AMOUNT
OF BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP
PERCENT
OF CLASS
NAME AND ADDRESS      SOLE      SHARED      SOLE      SHARED            
State Street Corporation and
various direct and indirect subsidiaries1
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
032,314,4080 53,605,27853,605,2789.16
The Vanguard Group2
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
916,786111,30636,483,3911,021,17737,504,5686.41
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52ndStreet
New York, NY 10055
30,324,91726,87235,155,35426,87235,182,2266.00

Name and Address

Voting Authority

 

Dispositive Authority

 

Total Amount

of Beneficial

Ownership

Percent of

class

Sole

Shared

 

Sole

Shared

 

BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055

29,389,492

0

 

34,578,559

0

 

34,578,559

6.3

State Street Corporation and
various direct and indirect subsidiaries
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111

0

21,833,959

 

0

44,782,540

 

44,787,748

8.1

The Vanguard Group(1)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355

825,696

155,991

 

48,231,886

927,365

 

49,159,251

8.89

(1)

Beneficial ownership includes 624,102 shares for which Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“VFTC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner, as a result of serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Beneficial ownership also includes 494,706 shares for which Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. (“VIA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

1 State Street Bank and Trust Company serves as investment manager for certain Caterpillar defined contribution plans (21,290,870 shares).
2 Beneficial ownership includes 751,995 shares for which Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“VFTC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner, as a result of serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. VFTC directs the voting of these shares. Beneficial ownership also includes 433,973 shares for which Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. (“VIA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |71

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    58


Back to Contents




Table of ContentsSECURITYOWNERSHIPOFEXECUTIVEOFFICERSANDDIRECTORS*

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Security ownership of Caterpillar’s Executive Officers, Board of Directors and Nominees to the Board of Directors (as of December 31, 2016)January 1, 2020) is included in the following table.table:

      COMMON
STOCK1
      SHARES UNDERLYING
STOCK OPTIONS/SARs
EXERCISABLE WITHIN
60 DAYS
      ADDITIONAL STOCK
OPTIONS/SARs
EXERCISABLE UPON
RETIREMENT2
      PERCENT
OF
CLASS
David P. Bozeman23,790           166,910                     0          *
David L. Calhoun31,3200 1,672*
Robert B. Charter25,966116,8820*
Daniel M. Dickinson11,27201,672*
Juan Gallardo268,5835,8331,672*
Jesse J. Greene, Jr.11,96001,672*
Bradley M. Halverson20,068175,406290,131*
Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.3,91900*
Dennis A. Muilenburg7,88600*
Douglas R. Oberhelman232,8201,418,774909,389*
William A. Osborn55,27201,672*
Debra L. Reed2,07500*
Edward B. Rust, Jr.28,05201,672*
Susan C. Schwab13,12101,672*
Jim Umpleby36,792188,410315,567*
Miles D. White4,33401,672*
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.3000*
All directors and executive officers as a group4(20 persons)841,8522,437,8461,742,526*

 

Common

Stock(1)

 

Shares Underlying

Stock Options/

SARs/RSUs

Exercisable within

60 Days

Additional Stock

Options/SARs/RSUs

Exercisable upon

Retirement(2)

Total

William P. Ainsworth

56,114

 

103,745

125

159,984

Kelly A. Ayotte

1,475

 

-

-

1,475

Andrew R.J. Bonfield

7,588

(3) 

7,693

-

15,281

David L. Calhoun

44,843

 

-

-

44,843

Bob De Lange

17,867

 

161,941

-

179,808

Daniel M. Dickinson

7,261

 

-

-

7,261

Juan Gallardo

273,807

 

-

-

273,807

Denise C. Johnson

11,605

 

18,764

-

30,369

Dennis A. Muilenburg

11,882

 

-

-

11,882

William A. Osborn

52,662

 

-

-

52,662

Debra L. Reed-Klages

6,071

 

-

-

6,071

Edward B. Rust, Jr.

32,099

 

-

-

32,099

Susan C. Schwab

18,082

 

-

-

18,082

D. James Umpleby III

64,696

 

677,564

-

742,260

Miles D. White

6,629

 

-

-

6,629

Rayford Wilkins, Jr.

1,960

 

-

-

1,960

All directors and executive officers as a group(4) (20 persons)

660,853

 

1,029,866

125

1,690,844

*

Each person listed in the table has beneficial ownership of less than 1 percent.

(1)

Common stock that is directly or indirectly beneficially owned, including stock that is individually or jointly owned and shares over which the individual has either sole or shared investment or voting authority.

(2)

Stock Options, SARs or RSUs that are not presently exercisable within 60 days but that would become immediately exercisable if such individual was eligible to retire and elected to retire pursuant to long-service separation.

(3)

Does not include 13,091 unvested restricted stock units granted on September 7, 2018, that will vest on September 7, 2020.

(4)

None of the shares held by the group has been pledged.

1 Common stock that is directly or indirectly beneficially owned, including stock that is individually or jointly owned and shares over which the individual has either sole or shared investment or voting authority.
2 SARs or RSUs that are not presently exercisable within 60 days but that would become immediately exercisable if such individual was eligible to retire and elected to retire pursuant to long-service separation.
3 Mr. Wilkins joined the Board in April 2017.
4 None of the shares held by the group has been pledged.
* Less than 1 percent.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE, and to furnish Caterpillar with copies of such forms. Based on our review of the forms we have received, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe that, during 2016,the current fiscal year and in prior fiscal years, each of our executive officers and directors complied with all such filing requirements with the exception of one late Form 4 filing by David P. Bozeman disclosing one transaction, which was filed late dueunless previously reported.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    59


Back to an administrative error.Contents

72 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsACCESSTOFORM10-K

MATTERS RAISED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING NOT INCLUDED IN THIS STATEMENT

We do not know of any matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting other than those discussed in this statement. If any other matter is properly presented, proxy holders will vote on the matter in their discretion.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING

A proposal for action or the nomination of a director to be presented by any shareholder at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders will be acted on only:

If the proposal is to be included in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the proposal is received at the office of the Corporate Secretary on or before January 2, 2018;

If the proposal or the nomination of a director is not to be included in the proxy statement, the proposal is received at the office of the Corporate Secretary no earlier than February 14, 2018, and no later than April 15, 2018.

If the proposal is for the nomination of directors to be included in our proxy statement pursuant to proxy access under Article II, Section 4 of Caterpillar’s bylaws, the proposal is received at the office of the Corporate Secretary no earlier than December 3, 2017, and no later than January 2, 2018.

In each case, your proposal or nomination must be delivered in the manner and accompanied by the information required in our bylaws. You may request a copy of the bylaws by writing to Caterpillar Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices. Our bylaws are also available on our website at www.caterpillar.com/governance. As of the date of this proxy statement, our principal executive offices are located at 100 NE Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois 61629, but we have announced plans to establish our principal executive offices in the Chicago, Illinois area by the end of 2017. The location of our new principal executive offices will be reflected in our future filings with the SEC and, upon the change in the location of our principal executive offices, shareholder proposals, director nominations and requests for copies of our bylaws should be delivered to that address. Additionally, we request that you send a copy to the following facsimile number: 309-675-6620.

ACCESS TO FORM 10-K

OnUpon written request, we will provide, without charge to each record or beneficial holder of Caterpillar common stock as of April 17, 2017,13, 2020, we will provide a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, as filed with the SEC,including the financial statements and schedules.SEC. Written requests should be directed to Caterpillar Inc. c/oChief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at 510 Lake Cook Road, Suite 100, NE Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois 61629.Deerfield, IL 60015.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |73




Table of ContentsNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING MEETING ATTENDANCE AND VOTING

Q:Why am I receiving these proxy materials?
A:You have received these proxy materials because you are a Caterpillar shareholder and Caterpillar’s Board of Directors is soliciting your authority (or proxy) to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you under SEC rules and is designed to assist you in voting your shares.
Q:How do I obtain an admission ticket to attend the Annual Meeting?
A:Anyone wishing to attend the Annual Meeting must have an admission ticket. Admission is limited to:
Shareholders on April 17, 2017, together with one immediate family member;
Authorized proxy holders of Shareholders on April 17, 2017;The following definitions are provided for the non-GAAP financial measures used in this proxy statement. These non-GAAP financial measures have no standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to the calculation of similar measures for other companies. Management does not intend these items to be considered in isolation or
An authorized representative of a registered shareholder who has been designated to present a shareholder proposal.

You must provide evidence of your ownership of shares with your ticket request and follow the requirements for obtaining an admission ticket specified in the “Admission and Ticket Request Procedure” on page 77.Accredited members of the media and analysts are also permitted to attend the Annual Meeting by following the directions provided in the “Admission and Ticket Request Procedure” on page 77.

Q:What is the difference between a registered shareholder and a street name holder?
A:A registered shareholder is a shareholder whose ownership of Caterpillar common stock is reflected directly on the books and records of our transfer agent, Computershare Shareowner Services LLC. If you hold stock through a bank, broker or other intermediary, you hold your shares in “street name” and are not a registered shareholder. For shares held in street name, the registered shareholder is a bank, broker or other intermediary. Caterpillar only has access to ownership records for registered shareholders.
Q:When was the record date and who is entitled to vote?
A:

The Board set April 17, 2017 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Holders of Caterpillar common stock as of the record date are entitled to one vote per share. As of April 17, 2017, there were 589,157,050 shares of Caterpillar common stock outstanding.

A list of all registered shareholders as of the record date will be available for examination by shareholders during normal business hours at 100 NE Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois 61629 at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting and will also be available for examination at the Annual Meeting.

Q:How do I vote?
A:

You may vote by any of the following methods:


In Person – Shareholders that obtain an admission ticket and attend the Annual Meeting will receive a ballot for voting. If you hold shares in street name, you must also obtain a legal proxy from your broker to vote in person and submit the proxy along with your ballot at the meeting.

By Mail – Complete, sign and return the proxy and/or voting instruction card provided.

By Mobile Device – Scan this QR code and follow the voting links.

By Phone – Follow the instructions on your Internet Notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notice.

By Internet– Follow the instructions on your Internet Notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notice.


74 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

If you vote by phone, mobile device or the Internet, please have your Internet Notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notice available. The control number appearing on your Internet Notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notice is necessary to process your vote. A mobile device, phone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned the card by mail.
Q:How do I vote my 401(k) or savings plan shares?
A:

If you participate in a 401(k) or savings plan sponsored by Caterpillar or one of its subsidiaries that includes a Caterpillar stock investment fund, you may give voting instructions to the plan trustee with respect to the shares of Caterpillar common stock in that fund that are associated with your plan account. The plan trustee will follow your voting instructions unless it determines that to do so would be contrary to law. If you do not provide voting instructions, the plan trustee will act in accordance with the employee benefit plan documents. In general, the plan documents specify that the trustee will vote the shares for which it does not receive instructions in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it received timely instructions, unless it determines that to do so would be contrary to law.

You may revoke previously given voting instructions by following the instructions provided by the trustee.

Q:What are “broker non-votes” and why is it important that I submit my voting instructions for shares I hold in street name?
A:

Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), if a broker or other financial institution holds your shares in its name and you do not provide your voting instructions to them, that firm’s discretion to vote your shares for you is very limited. For this Annual Meeting, in the absence of your voting instructions, your broker only has discretion to vote on Proposal 2, the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. It does not have discretion to vote your shares for any of the other proposals expected to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If you do not provide voting instructions and your broker elects to vote your shares on Proposal 2, the missing votes for each of the other proposals are considered “broker non-votes.”

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares promptly.

Q:How can I authorize someone else to attend the Annual Meeting or vote for me?
A:

Registered shareholders can authorize someone other than the individual(s) named on the proxy and/or voting instruction card to attend the meeting or vote on their behalf by crossing out the individual(s) named on the card and inserting the name of the individual being authorized or by providing a written authorization to the individual being authorized.

Street name holders can authorize someone other than the individual(s) named on the legal proxy obtained from their broker to attend the meeting or vote on their behalf by providing a written authorization to the individual being authorized along with the legal proxy.

To obtain an admission ticket for an authorized proxy representative, see the requirements specified in the “Admission and Ticket Request Procedure” on page 77.

Q:How can I change or revoke my proxy?
A:

Registered shareholders: You may change or revoke your proxy by submitting a written notice of revocation to Caterpillar Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary at 100 NE Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois 61629 before the Annual Meeting or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. For all methods of voting, the last vote cast will supersede all previous votes.

Holders in street name:You may change or revoke your voting instructions by following the specific directions provided to you by your bank or broker.
Q:What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?
A:

A quorum of shareholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. Holders of at least one-third of all Caterpillar common stock must be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for establishing a quorum.

Q:What vote is necessary for action to be taken on proposals?
A:

In uncontested elections, director nominees are elected by a majority vote of the shares cast, meaning that each director nominee must receive a greater number of shares voted “for” such director than shares voted “against” such director. If an incumbent director does not receive a greater number of shares voted “for” such director than shares voted “against” such director, then such director must tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors.


2017 Proxy Statement

 |75




Table of Contents

In a contested election, director nominees are elected by a plurality of the votes cast, meaning that the nominees with the most affirmative votes are elected to fill the available seats.

All other actions presented for a vote of the shareholders at the Annual Meeting require an affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter, except for the advisory vote on the frequency of executive compensation (Proposal 4), where the alternative receiving the most votes will be considered to be the expressed preference of the shareholders, even if those votes do not constitute a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Abstentions will have no effect on director elections. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against all other proposals. Broker non-votes will not have an effect on any of the proposals presented for your vote.

Votes submitted by mail, telephone, mobile device or Internet will be voted by the individuals named on the card (or the individual properly authorized) in the manner indicated. If you do not specify how you want your shares voted, they will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations. If you hold shares in more than one account, you must vote each proxy and/or voting instruction card you receive to ensure that all shares you own are voted.

Q:What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?
A:

Whenever possible, registered shares and plan shares for multiple accounts with the same registration will be combined into the same proxy card. Shares with different registrations cannot be combined and as a result, you may receive more than one proxy card. For example, shares held in your individual account will not be combined on the same proxy card as shares held in a joint account with your spouse.

Street shares are not combined with registered or plan shares and may result in your receipt of more than one proxy card. For example, shares held by a broker for your account will not be combined with shares registered directly in your name.

If you hold shares in more than one form, you must vote separately for each notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notification you receive that has a unique control number to ensure that all shares you own are voted.

If you receive more than one proxy card for accounts that you believe could be combined because the registration is the same, contact our transfer agent (for registered shares) or your broker (for street shares) to request that the accounts be combined for future mailings.

Q:Who pays for the solicitation of proxies?
A:Caterpillar pays the cost of soliciting proxies on behalf of the Board. This solicitation is being made by mail and through the Internet, but also may be made by telephone or in person. We have hired Innisfree to assist in the solicitation. We will pay Innisfree a fee of $15,000 for these services and will reimburse their out-of-pocket expenses. We will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for sending proxy materials to shareholders and obtaining their votes. Proxies also may be solicited on behalf of the Board by directors, officers or employees of Caterpillar by telephone or in person, or by mail or through the Internet. No additional compensation will be paid to such directors, officers, or employees for soliciting proxies.
Q:Where can I find voting results of the Annual Meeting?
A:We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish the results in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

76 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

ADMISSION AND TICKET REQUEST PROCEDURE

ADMISSION

Admission is limited to shareholders on April 17, 2017 and one immediate family member, or one individual designated as a shareholder’s authorized proxy holder or one representative designatedsubstitute for the related GAAP measures.

AdjustedProfit:The Company believes it is important to separately quantify the profit impact of four significant items in writing to present a shareholder proposal. In each case,order for the individual must have an admission ticket and valid government issued photo identificationCompany’s results to be admittedmeaningful to readers. These items consist of (i) pension and OPEB mark-to-market losses resulting from plan remeasurements, (ii) U.S. tax reform impact, (iii) restructuring costs in 2018, which were incurred to generate longer-term benefits and (iv) certain deferred tax valuation allowance adjustments. The Company does not consider these items indicative of earnings from ongoing business activities and believes the non-GAAP measures will provide investors with useful perspective on underlying business results and trends and aids with assessing the Company’s period-over-period results.

Reconciliations of enterprise operating profit to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, consolidated operating profit, are as follows:

(Millions of dollars)

 

2018

 

2019

 

Consolidated operating profit

 

$

8,293

 

$

8,290

 

Restructuring costs

 

$

394

 

$

 

Enterprise operating profit

 

$

8,687

 

$

8,290

 

Reconciliations of enterprise operating profit margin to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, operating profit as a percent of sales and revenues, are as follows:

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

Operating profit as a percent of total sales and revenues

 

 

15.2

%

 

15.4

%

Restructuring costs(1)

 

 

0.7

%

 

%

Enterprise operating profit margin

 

 

15.9

%

 

15.4

%

(1)

2019 restructuring costs were not material.

Reconciliations of adjusted profit per share to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, profit per share - diluted, are as follows:

 

 

2018

 

2019

 

Profit per share - diluted

 

$

10.26

 

$

10.74

 

Per share mark-to-market losses(1)

 

$

0.64

 

$

0.64

 

Per share U.S. tax reform impact

 

$

(0.17)

 

$

(0.31)

 

Per share restructuring costs(2)

 

$

0.50

 

$

 

Per share deferred tax valuation allowance adjustment

 

$

(0.01)

 

$

 

Adjusted profit per share

$

11.22

 

$

11.06

 

(1)

At statutory tax rates.

(2)

2018 restructuring costs were at statutory tax rates. 2019 restructuring costs were not material.

 

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    60


Back to Contents

FREQUENTLYASKEDQUESTIONSREGARDINGMEETINGATTENDANCEANDVOTING

A:

You have received these proxy materials because you were a Caterpillar shareholder of record as of April 13, 2020, and Caterpillar’s Board of Directors is soliciting your authority (or proxy) to vote your shares at the 2020 Annual Meeting. This proxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you under SEC rules and is designed to assist you in voting your shares.

A:

The 2020 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of shareholders, which will be conducted exclusively by webcast. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting only if you were a Caterpillar shareholder as of the close of business on the Record Date, or if you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. In addition, share ownershipThere is no physical location for this meeting.

You can attend the Annual Meeting online, vote and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/268805716. The password for the meeting is CAT2020. Please follow the registration instructions outlined below.

The online meeting will be verified by one ofbegin promptly at 8:00 a.m., Central Time. We encourage you to access the following methods:meeting prior to the start time to provide ample time for check-in.

REGISTERED SHAREHOLDERSSTREET NAME HOLDERS

Option A

A copy of your proxy card or notice showing shareholder name and address

Option B

Name(s) of shareholder,
Address,
Phone number, and
Social security number or shareholder account ID; or

Also include:

Name of immediate family member guest, if not a shareholder
Name of authorized proxy representative, if applicable
Address where tickets should be mailed and phone number

One of the following:

A copy of your April brokerage account statement showing Caterpillar stock ownership as of April 17, 2017; or
A letter from your broker, bank or other nominee verifying your ownership as of April 17, 2017; or
A copy of your brokerage account voting instruction card showing shareholder name and address

Also include:

Name of immediate family member guest, if not a shareholder
Name of authorized proxy representative, if applicable
Address where tickets should be mailed and phone number

TICKET REQUEST DEADLINEHOW CAN I REGISTER FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING?

A:

Ticket requests must include all information specified inRegistered Holders: If you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you hold your shares through the applicable table above and be submitted in writing and received by Caterpillar on or before May 31, 2017. No requests will be processed after that date.

TO SUBMIT A REQUEST

Submit ticket requests by emailCompany’s transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to catshareservices@cat.com or by mail to Caterpillar Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary, 100 NE Adams Street, Peoria, Illinois 61629-7310. Ticket requests by telephone will not be accepted.

AUTHORIZED PROXY REPRESENTATIVE

A shareholder may appoint a representativeregister to attend the Annual Meeting and/virtually on the Internet. To attend the meeting, please follow the instructions on the Proxy Card or voteNotice that you received with this Proxy Statement. To access the meeting, you will need the 15-digit control number printed on his/her behalf.your card or notice.

Street Holders: If your shares are held in “street name” (i.e., you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker), you must register in advance to attend the Annual Meeting virtually on the Internet. To register, you must submit a Legal Proxy that reflects your proof of proxy power. The admission ticketLegal Proxy must reflect your Caterpillar Inc. holdings along with your name. Please forward a copy of the Legal Proxy, along with your email address to Computershare. Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare either by email to legalproxy@computershare.com (forwarding the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy) or by mail to Computershare, Caterpillar Inc. Legal Proxy, P.O. Box 43001, Providence, RI 02940-3001.

Requests for registration must be requestedlabeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 5, 2020. You will receive a confirmation of your registration by the shareholder but will be issued in the nameemail (or by mail, if no email address is provided) after Computershare receives your registration materials.

Proponent of the authorized representative. Individuals holding admission tickets that are not issued in their name will not be admitted to the Annual Meeting. The shareholder information specified above and a written proxy authorization must accompany the ticket request.

PROPONENT OF A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALShareholder Proposal

: For each shareholder proposal included in this proxy statement, the shareholder sponsor should notify the Company in writing of the individual authorized to present the proposal on behalf of the shareholder at the Annual Meeting. One admission ticketThe notification should be received no later than 5:00 p.m, Eastern Time, on June 5, 2020, and include the name, address and email address of the authorized individual. The Company will provide the authorized individual with instructions to join the virtual meeting and present the proposal. Please submit notification by email to catshareservices@cat.com or by mail to Caterpillar Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary, 510 Lake Cook Road, Suite 100, Deerfield, IL 60015.

A:

A registered shareholder is a shareholder whose ownership of Caterpillar common stock is reflected directly on the books and records of our transfer agent, Computershare Inc. If you hold stock through a bank, broker or other intermediary, you hold your shares in “street name” and are not a registered shareholder. For shares held in street name, the registered shareholder is the bank, broker or other intermediary. Caterpillar only has access to ownership records for registered shareholders.

A:

The Board of Directors set April 13, 2020, as the record date for the 2020 Annual Meeting. Holders of Caterpillar common stock as of the record date are entitled to one vote per share. As of April 13, 2020, there were 541,239,314 shares of Caterpillar common stock outstanding.

A list of all registered shareholders as of the record date will be issuedavailable for the designated representative.

MEDIA

Accredited members of the media must register with the Companyexamination by shareholders during normal business hours at 510LakeCookRoad,Suite100,Deerfield,IL60015at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. To register, please contact Rachel Potts by phone 309-675-6892 or email (Potts_Rachel_A@cat.com).

ANALYSTS

Analysts must register with the Company prior toMeeting and will also be available for examination during the Annual Meeting. To register, please contact Amy Campbell, Director of Investor Relations,Meeting at www.meetingcenter.io/268805716.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    61


Back to Contents

A:

You may vote by phone 309-675-4549 or email (CATir@cat.com).

2017 Proxy Statement

 |77




Table of Contents

EXHIBIT A - AMENDED AND RESTATED CATERPILLAR INC. 2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

CATERPILLAR INC.
2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED, EFFECTIVE AS OF JUNE 14, 2017)

I. INTRODUCTION

1.1Purposes. The purposes of the Caterpillar Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (this “Plan”) are (i) to align the interests of the Company’s stockholders and the recipients of awards under this Plan by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in the Company’s growth and success, (ii) to advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants and independent contractors and (iii) to motivate such persons to act in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Plan has been amended and restated, as set forth herein, effective June 14, 2017.

1.2Certain Definitions.

(a)Award Gain” shall mean (a) with respect to a given Option exercise, the product of (X) the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the grant price per share of Common Stock of such Option times (Y) the number of shares purchased pursuant to the exercise of such Option, and (b) with respect to any other settlement of an award granted to the participant, the Fair Market Value of the cash or shares of Common Stock paid or payable to the participant (regardless of any elective deferral pursuant to Section 5.10) less any cash or the Fair Market Value of any shares of Common Stock or property (other than an award that would have itself then been forfeitable hereunder and excluding any payment of tax withholding) paid by the participant to the Company as a condition of or in connection with such settlement.
(b)Award Noticeshall mean the written or electronic notice evidencing an award hereunder.
(c)Blackout Period” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(b).
(d)Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
(e)Business Combination” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.9(b).
(f)Cause” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.9(c).
(g)Change in Control” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.9(b).
(h)Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(i)Committee” shall mean the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board, or any successor or subcommittee thereof, consisting of two or more members of the Board, each of whom is intended to be (i) a “Non-Employee Director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, (ii) an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and (iii) “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or, if the Common Stock is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, within the meaning of the rules of the principal stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded.
(j)Common Stock” shall mean the common stock of the Company, and all rights appurtenant thereto.
(k)Company” shall mean Caterpillar Inc., a Delaware corporation, or any successor thereto.
(l)Company Voting Securities” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.9(b)(ii).
(m)Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(n)Fair Market Value” shall mean, as of any given date, the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on a particular date determined by such methods or procedures as may be established from time to time

78 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of any date shall be the closing transaction price of a share of Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for that date or, if no closing price is reported for that date, the closing price on the next preceding date for which transactions were reported. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, for purposes of clause (D) of Section 2.1(c) of the Plan, Fair Market Value means the actual price at which the shares of Common Stock used to acquire the shares of Common Stock are sold.
(o)Forfeiture Event” shall have the meaning set forth inSection 5.16(a).
(p)Free-Standing SAR” shall mean an SAR which is not granted in tandem with, or by reference to, an Option, which entitles the holder thereof to receive, upon exercise, shares of Common Stock (which may be Restricted Stock) or, to the extent provided in the applicable Award Notice, cash or a combination thereof, with an aggregate value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the base price of such SAR, multiplied by the number of such SARs which are exercised.
(q)Good Reason” shall have the meaning set forth inSection 5.9(d).
(r)Incentive Stock Option” shall mean an option to purchase shares of Common Stock that meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision, which is intended by the Committee to constitute an Incentive Stock Option.
(s)Incumbent Directors” shall have the meaning set forth inSection 5.9(b)(i).
(t)Non-Employee Director” shall mean any director of the Company who is not an officer or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary.
(u)Nonqualified Stock Option” shall mean an option to purchase shares of Common Stock which is not an Incentive Stock Option.
(v)Option” shall mean an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option granted under this Plan.
(w)Performance Award” shall mean a right to receive an amount of cash, Common Stock, or a combination of both, contingent upon the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.
(x)Performance Measures” shall mean the criteria and objectives, established by the Committee, which shall be satisfied or met (i) as a condition to the grant or exercisability of all or a portion of an Option or SAR or (ii) during the applicable Restriction Period or Performance Period as a condition to the vesting of the holder’s interest, in the case of a Restricted Stock Award, of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award, or, in the case of a Restricted Stock Unit Award or Performance Award, to the holder’s receipt of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award or of payment with respect to such award. To the extent necessary for an award to be qualified performance- based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder, such criteria and objectives shall be one or more of the following corporate-wide or subsidiary, division, operating unit or individual measures: (i) attainment by a share of Common Stock of a specified Fair Market Value for a specified period of time, (ii) cash flow from operations, (iii) cash flow margin or free cash flow, (iv) cash flow per share, (v) earnings of the Company before or after taxes and/or interest, (vi) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and/or amortization (“EBITDA”), (vii) EBITDA margin, (viii) economic value added, (ix) expense levels or cost reduction goals, (x) gross profit or margin, (xi) increase in stockholder value, (xii) interest expense, (xiii) inventory, (xiv) market share, (xv) net assets, (xvi) net cash provided by operations, (xvii) net operating profits after taxes, (xviii) operating expenses, (xix) operating income, (xx) operating margin, (xxi) operating profit after capital charge (“OPACC”), (xxii) percent of dealer deliveries (“PODD”), (xxiii) percent of industry sales (“PINS”), (xxiv) percent of parts sales (“POPS”), (xxv) percent of parts sales – Caterpillar branded (“POPS-C”), (xxvi) pretax income, (xxvii) price-to-earnings growth, (xxviii) price realization, (xxix) primary or fully-diluted earnings per share or profit per share, (xxx) profit after tax, (xxxi) return on assets, (xxxii) return on equity, (xxxiii) return on invested capital, (xxxiv) return on investments, (xxxv) return on sales, (xxxvi) revenues, (xxxvii) sales, (xxxviii) total cash flow, (xxxix) total stockholder (shareholder) return and (xl) strategic business criteria consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified goals relating to (A) acquisitions or divestitures, (B) business expansion, (C) realized production system benefits, (D) cost targets,

2017 Proxy Statement

 |79




Table of Contents

(E) customer acquisition, (F) customer satisfaction, (G) diversity and inclusion, (H) efficiency, (I) inventory turns, (J) realized lean benefits, (K) management of employment practices and employee benefits, (L) market penetration, (M) purchasing material costs, (N) quality and quality audit scores, (O) reductions in errors and omissions, (P) reductions in lost business, (Q) supervision of litigation and information technology, (R) sustainability or (S) realized 6 Sigma benefits. Each such goal may be expressed on an absolute or relative basis and may include comparisons based on current internal targets, the past performance of the Company (including the performance of one or more subsidiaries, divisions, or operating units) or the past or current performance of other companies (or a combination of such past and current performance). In addition to the ratios specifically enumerated above, performance goals may include comparisons relating to capital (including, but not limited to, the cost of capital), shareholders’ equity, shares outstanding, assets or net assets, sales, or any combination thereof. The applicable performance measures may be applied on a pre- or post-tax basis and may be established or adjusted in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code to include or exclude objectively determinable components of any performance measure, including, without limitation, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, nonrecurring, infrequently occurring or one-time events affecting the Company or its financial statements or changes in law or accounting principles (“Adjustment Events”). In the sole discretion of the Committee, unless such action would cause a grant to a covered employee to fail to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may amend or adjust the Performance Measures or other terms and conditions of an outstanding award in recognition of any Adjustment Events. If the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant awards that are not intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may grant such award without satisfying the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and that use Performance Measures other than those specified herein.
(y)Performance Period” shall mean any period designated by the Committee during which (i) the Performance Measures applicable to an award shall be measured and (ii) the conditions to vesting applicable to an award shall remain in effect.
(z)Permitted Transferee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.4(a).
(aa)Plan” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
(bb)Prior Plan” shall mean the Caterpillar Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan and each other plan previously maintained by the Company under which equity awards remain outstanding as of the effective date of this Plan.
(cc)Restricted Stock” shall mean shares of Common Stock which are subject to a Restriction Period and which may, in addition thereto, be subject to the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.
(dd)Restricted Stock Award” shall mean an award of Restricted Stock under this Plan.
(ee)Restricted Stock Unit” shall mean a right to receive one share of Common Stock or, in lieu thereof and to the extent provided in the applicable Award Notice, the Fair Market Value of such share of Common Stock in cash, which shall be contingent upon the expiration of a specified Restriction Period and which may, in addition thereto, be contingent upon the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.
(ff)Restricted Stock Unit Award” shall mean an award of Restricted Stock Units under this Plan.
(gg)Restriction Period” shall mean any period designated by the Committee during which (i) the Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Award may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or disposed of, except as provided in this Plan or the Award Notice relating to such award, or (ii) the conditions to vesting applicable to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall remain in effect.
(hh)SAR” shall mean a stock appreciation right which may be a Free-Standing SAR or a Tandem SAR.
(ii)Stock Award” shall mean a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit Award or Unrestricted Stock Award.
(jj)Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture or similar entity in which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, an equity interest possessing more than 50% of the combined voting power of the total outstanding equity interests of such entity or, in the case of a partnership,

80 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

joint venture or similar entity, the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of management or policies of the controlled entity.
(kk)Substitute Award” shall mean an award granted under this Plan upon the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding equity awards previously granted by a company or other entity in connection with a corporate transaction, including a merger, combination, consolidation or acquisition of property or stock;provided,however, that in no event shall the term “Substitute Award” be construed to refer to an award made in connection with the cancellation and repricing of an Option or SAR.
(ll)Tandem SAR” shall mean an SAR which is granted in tandem with, or by reference to, an Option (including a Nonqualified Stock Option granted prior to the date of grant of the SAR), which entitles the holder thereof to receive, upon exercise of such SAR and surrender for cancellation of all or a portion of such Option, shares of Common Stock (which may be Restricted Stock) or, to the extent provided in the applicable Award Notice, cash or a combination thereof, with an aggregate value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the base price of such SAR, multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such Option, or portion thereof, which is surrendered.
(mm)Tax Date” shall have the meaning set forth inSection 5.5.
(nn)Ten Percent Holder” shall have the meaning set forth inSection 2.1(a).
(oo)Unrestricted Stock” shall mean shares of Common Stock which are not subject to a Restriction Period or Performance Measures.
(pp)Unrestricted Stock Award” shall mean an award of Unrestricted Stock under this Plan.

1.3Administration. This Plan shall be administered by the Committee. Any one or a combination of the following awards may be made under this Planmethods:

AttheAnnualMeeting If shares are registered in your name, to vote you will need your 15-digit Control Number provided with the Notice of the Meeting or on your Proxy Card. If you are a street name holder, please refer to “How Can I Register for the Annual Meeting?” on page 61 for information on how to register to attend the Annual Meeting in order to vote your shares.

ByMail Complete, sign and return the proxy and/or voting instruction card provided.

ByMobileDevice Scan this QR code and follow the voting links.

ByPhone Follow the instructions on your Internet Notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notice.

ByInternet Follow the instructions on your Internet Notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notice.

If you vote by phone, mobile device or the Internet, please have your Internet Notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notice available. The control number appearing on your Internet Notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notice is necessary to eligible persons: (i) Options to purchase shares of Common Stockprocess your vote. A mobile device, phone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies in the formsame manner as if you marked, signed and returned the card by mail.

A:

If you participate in a 401(k) or savings plan sponsored by Caterpillar or one of Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options; (ii) SARs in the form of Tandem SARs or Free-Standing SARs; (iii) Stock Awards in the form of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Unrestricted Stock; and (iv) Performance Awards. The Committee shall, subjectits subsidiaries that includes a Caterpillar stock investment fund, you may give voting instructions to the terms of this Plan, select eligible persons for participation in this Plan and determine the form, amount and timing of each award to such persons and,if applicable, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to an award, the number of SARs, the number of Restricted Stock Units, the dollar value subject to a Performance Award, the grant price or base price associated with the award, the time and conditions of exercise or settlement of the award and all other terms and conditions of the award, including, without limitation, the form of the Award Notice evidencing the award. The Committee may, in its sole discretion and for any reason at any time, unless such action would cause a grant to a covered employee to fail to qualify under Section 162(m) of the Code and regulations thereunder as qualified performance-based compensation, take action such that (i) any or all outstanding Options and SARs shall become exercisable in part or in full, (ii) all or a portion of the Restriction Period applicable to any outstanding Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall lapse, (iii) all or a portion of the Performance Period applicable to any outstanding Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Performance Awards shall lapse and (iv) the Performance Measures (if any) applicable to any outstanding award shall be deemed to be satisfied at the target or any other level. The Committee shall, subject to the terms of this Plan, interpret this Plan and the application thereof, establish rules and regulations it deems necessary or desirable for the administration of this Plan and may impose, incidental to the grant of an award, conditionsplan trustee with respect to the award, such as limiting competitive employmentshares of Caterpillar common stock in that fund that are associated with your plan account by completing the voting instruction card or other activities. All such interpretations, rules, regulations and conditions shall be conclusive and binding on all parties.

email notice you receive. The Committee may delegate some or all of its power and authority hereunderplan trustee will follow your voting instructions unless it determines that to the Board or, subject to applicable law, to the Chief Executive Officer or such other executive officer of the Company as the Committee deems appropriate;provided,however, that (i) the Committee may not delegate its power and authority to the Board or the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of the Company with regard to the grant of an award to any person who is a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code or who, in the Committee’s judgment, is likely to be a covered employee at any time during the period an award hereunder to such employeedo so would be outstanding and (ii)contrary to law. If you do not provide voting instructions, the Committee may not delegate its power and authority to the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of the Company with regard to the selection for participation in this Plan of an officer, director or other person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or decisions concerning the timing, pricing or amount of an award to such an officer, director or other person.

No member of the Board or Committee, and neither the Chief Executive Officer nor any other executive officer to whom the Committee delegates any of its power and authority hereunder, shall be liable for anyplan trustee will act omission, interpretation,

2017 Proxy Statement

 |81




Table of Contents

construction or determination made in connection with this Plan in good faith, and the members of the Board and the Committee and the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer shall be entitled to indemnification and reimbursement by the Company in respect of any claim, loss, damage or expense (including attorneys’ fees) arising therefrom to the full extent permitted by law (except as otherwise may be provided in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and/or By-laws) and under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that may be in effect from time to time.

1.4Eligibility. Participants in this Plan shall consist of such officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants, independent contractors, and persons expected to become officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants, and independent contractors of the Company and its Subsidiaries as the Committee in its sole discretion may select from time to time;provided, that Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to employees of the Company or a Subsidiary Corporation, within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code. The Committee’s selection of a person to participate in this Plan at any time shall not require the Committee to select such person to participate in this Plan at any other time. Except as provided otherwise in an Award Notice, for purposes of this Plan, references to employment by the Company shall also mean employment by a Subsidiary, and references to employment shall include service as a Non-Employee Director, consultant or independent contractor. The extent to which a participant shall be considered employed during any periods during which such participant is on a leave of absence shall be determined in accordance with Company policy.

1.5Shares Available. Subject to adjustment as provided inSection 5.8 and to all other limits set forth in thisSection 1.5, 38.8 million shares of Common Stock were initially available for all awards under this Plan and no more than 38.8 million shares of Common Stock in the aggregate could be issued under the Plan in connection with Incentive Stock Options. Upon and subject to stockholder approval of the amendment and restatement of the Plan pursuant toSection 5.1, an additional 36 million shares of Common Stock shall become available for all awards under this Plan and an additional 36 million shares of Common Stock may be issued under the Plan in connection with Incentive Stock Options. To the extent the Company grants an Option or a Free-Standing SAR under the Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for future grants under the Plan shall be reduced by an amount equal to the number of shares subject to such Option or Free-Standing SAR. To the extent the Company grants a Stock Award or settles a Performance Award in shares of Common Stock, the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for future grants underthe Plan shall be reduced by an amount equal to 2.75 times the number of shares subject to such Stock Award or Performance Award.

To the extent that shares of Common Stock subject to an outstanding Option, SAR, Stock Award or Performance Award granted under the Plan, other than Substitute Awards, are not issued or delivered by reason of (i) the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such award (excluding shares subject to an Option cancelled upon settlement in shares of a related Tandem SAR or shares subject to a Tandem SAR cancelled upon exercise of a related Option) or (ii) the settlement of such award in cash, then such shares of Common Stock shall again be available under this Plan;provided,however, that shares of Common Stock subject to an award under this Plan shall not again be available for issuance under this Plan if such shares are (x) shares that were subject to an Option or an SAR and were not issued or delivered upon the net settlement or net exercise of such Option or SAR, (y) shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the grant price or the withholding taxes related to an outstanding Option or SAR or (z) shares repurchased by the Company on the open market with the proceeds of an Option exercise. Shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the withholding taxes for Stock Awards or Performance Awards granted under this Plan, but not Options or SARs, shall again be available for issuance under this Plan. The number of shares that again become available pursuant to this paragraph shall be equal to (i) one share for each share subject to an Option or Free-Standing SAR described herein and (ii) 2.75 shares for each share subject to a Stock Award or a Performance Award described herein. At the time this Plan becomes effective, none of the shares of Common Stock available for future grant under the Prior Plan shall be available for grant under this Plan and none of the shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding awards granted under the Prior Plan shall again become available for issuance under this Plan, whether upon the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such awards or otherwise.

The number of shares of Common Stock available for awards under this Plan shall not be reduced by (i) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to Substitute Awards or (ii) available shares under a stockholder approved plan of a company or other entity which was a party to a corporate transaction with the Company (as appropriately adjusted to reflect such corporate transaction) which become subject to awards granted under this Plan (subject to applicable stock exchange requirements).

82 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

Shares of Common Stock to be delivered under this Plan shall be made available from authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock, or authorized and issued shares of Common Stock reacquired and held as treasury shares or otherwise or a combination thereof.

1.6Per Person Limits. To the extent necessary for an award to be qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder (i) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Options or SARs, or a combination thereof, may be granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any person shall be 800,000 shares, subject to adjustment as provided inSection 5.8, (ii) with respect to Stock Awards subject to Performance Measures or Performance Awards denominated in Common Stock, which in either case areintended to qualify as performance-based awards under Section 162(m) of the Code, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock subject to such awards that may be earned by any person for each 12-month period during a Performance Period shall be the number of shares having a Fair Market Value of $20 million, determined as of the date of grant, subject to adjustment as provided inSection 5.8, and (iii) with respect to Performance Awards denominated in cash that are intended to qualify as performance-based awards under Section 162(m) of the Code, the maximum amount that may be earned by any person for each 12-month period during a Performance Period shall be $20 million. The aggregate grant date fair value of shares of Common Stock that may be granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any Non-Employee Director shall not exceed $750,000.

II. STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

2.1Stock Options. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Options to purchase shares of Common Stock to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee. Each Option, or portion thereof, that is not an Incentive Stock Option shall be a Nonqualified Stock Option. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date of grant) of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Options designated as Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a participant during any calendar year (under this Plan or any other plan of the Company, or any parent or Subsidiary) exceeds the amount (currently $100,000) established by the Code, such Options shall constitute Nonqualified Stock Options.

Options shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable:

(a)Number of Shares and Grant Price. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to an Option and the grant price per share of Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of the Option shall be determined by the Committee;provided,however, that the grant price per share of Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of an Option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of such Option;providedfurther, that if an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to any person who, at the time such Option is granted, owns capital stock possessing more than 10 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of capital stock of the Company (or of any parent or Subsidiary) (a “Ten Percent Holder”), the grant price per share of Common Stock shall not be less than the price (currently 110% of Fair Market Value) required by the Code in order to constitute an Incentive Stock Option.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an Option that is a Substitute Award, the grant price per share of the shares subject to such Option may be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant,provided, that the excess of: (a) the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date such Substitute Award is granted) of the shares subject to the Substitute Award, over (b) the aggregate purchase price thereof does not exceed the excess of: (x) the aggregate fair market value (as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Award, such fair market value to be determined by the Committee) of the shares of the predecessor company or other entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for by the Company, over (y) the aggregate purchase price of such shares.
(b)Option Period and Exercisability. The period during which an Option may be exercised shall be determined by the Committee;provided,however, that no Option shall be exercised later than ten (10) years after its date of grant;providedfurther, that if an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to a Ten Percent Holder, such Option shall not be exercised later than five years after its date of grant;provided,further, that with respect to a Nonqualified Stock Option, if the expiration date of such Option occurs during any period when the participant is prohibited from trading in securities of the Company

2017 Proxy Statement

 |83




Table of Contents

pursuant to the Company’s insider trading policy or other policy of the Company or during a period when the exercise of such Option would violate applicable securities laws (each, a “Blackout Period”), then the period during which such Option shall be exercisable shall continue until the date that is 30 days after the expiration of such Blackout Period. The Committee may, in its discretion, establish Performance Measures which shall be satisfied or met as a condition to the grant of an Option or to the exercisability of all or a portion of an Option. The Committee shall determine whether an Option shall become exercisable in cumulative or non-cumulative installments and in part or in full at any time. An exercisable Option, or portion thereof, may be exercised only with respect to whole shares of Common Stock. Prior to the exercise of an Option, the holder of such Option shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to such Option, including the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents.
(c)Method of Exercise. An Option may be exercised (i) by giving written or electronic notice to the Company or its designated agent, in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Company, specifying the number of whole shares of Common Stock to be purchased and paying the aggregate purchase price in full (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction) either (A) in cash, (B) by delivery (either actual delivery or by attestation procedures established by the Company) of shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value, determined as of the date of exercise, equal to the aggregate purchase price payable by reason of such exercise, (C) authorizing the Company to withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the date of exercise, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy such obligation, (D) in cash by a broker-dealer acceptable to the Company to whom the optionee has submitted an irrevocable notice of exercise or (E) a combination of (A), (B) and (C), in each case to the extent set forth in the Award Notice relating to the Option, (ii) if applicable, by surrendering to the Company any Tandem SARs which are cancelled by reason of the exercise of the Option and (iii) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued and no certificate representing shares of Common Stock shall be delivered until the full purchase price therefor and any withholding taxes thereon, as described inSection 5.5, have been paid (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction).

2.2Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant SARs to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee. The Award Notice relating to an SAR shall specify whether the SAR is a Tandem SAR or a Free-Standing SAR.

SARs shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable:

(a)Number of SARs and Base Price. The number of SARs subject to an award shall be determined by the Committee. Any Tandem SAR related to an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted at the same time that such Incentive Stock Option is granted. The base price of a Tandem SAR shall be the grant price per share of Common Stock of the related Option. The base price of a Free-Standing SAR shall be determined by the Committee;provided,however, that such base price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of such SAR (or, if earlier, the date of grant of the Option for which the SAR is exchanged or substituted).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an SAR that is a Substitute Award, the base price per share of the shares subject to such SAR may be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant,provided, that the excess of: (a) the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date such Substitute Award is granted) of the shares subject to the Substitute Award, over (b) the aggregate base price thereof does not exceed the excess of: (x) the aggregate fair market value (as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Award, such fair market value to be determined by the Committee) of the shares of the predecessor company or other entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for by the Company, over (y) the aggregate base price of such shares.
(b)Exercise Period and Exercisability. The period for the exercise of an SAR shall be determined by the Committee;provided,however, that no SAR shall be exercised later than ten (10) years after its date of grant;providedfurther, that no Tandem SAR shall be exercised later than the expiration, cancellation, forfeiture or other termination of the related Option;provided,further, if the expiration date of an SAR occurs during any Blackout

84 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

Period, then the period during which such SAR shall be exercisable shall continue until the date that is 30 days after the expiration of such Blackout Period. The Committee may, in its discretion, establish Performance Measures which shall be satisfied or met as a condition to the grant of an SAR or to the exercisability of all or a portion of an SAR. The Committee shall determine whether an SAR may be exercised in cumulative or non-cumulative installments and in part or in full at any time. An exercisable SAR, or portion thereof, may be exercised only with respect to whole shares of Common Stock. If an SAR is exercised for shares of Restricted Stock, a certificate or certificates representing such Restricted Stock shall be issued in accordance withSection 3.3(c), or such shares shall be transferred to the holder in book entry form with restrictions on the shares duly noted, and the holder of such Restricted Stock shall have such rights of a stockholder of the Company as determined pursuant toSection 3.3(d). Prior to the exercise of a stock-settled SAR, the holder of such SAR shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to such SAR, including the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents.
(c)Method of Exercise. A Tandem SAR may be exercised (i) by giving written or electronic notice to the Company or its designated agent, in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Company, specifying the number of whole SARs which are being exercised, (ii) by surrendering to the Company any Options which are cancelled by reason of the exercise of the Tandem SAR and (iii) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. A Free-Standing SAR may be exercised (A) by giving written or electronic notice to the Company, in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Company, specifying the whole number of SARs which are being exercised and (B) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued and no certificate representing shares of Common Stock shall be delivered until any withholding taxes thereon, as described inSection 5.5, have been paid (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction).

2.3Termination of Employment or Service. All of the terms relating to the exercise, cancellation or other disposition of an Option or SAR (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such Option or SAR, as the case may be, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable Award Notice.

2.4No Repricing. The Committee shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (i) reduce the grant price or base price of any previously granted Option or SAR, (ii) cancel any previously granted Option or SAR in exchange for another Option or SAR with a lower grant price or base price or (iii) cancel any previously granted Option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award if the grant price of such Option or the base price of such SAR exceeds the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of such cancellation, in each case, other than in connection with a Change in Control or the adjustment provisions set forth inSection 5.8.

III. STOCK AWARDS

3.1Stock Awards. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Stock Awards to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee. The Award Notice relating to a Stock Award shall specify whether the Stock Award is a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit Award or Unrestricted Stock Award.

3.2Terms of Unrestricted Stock Awards.The number of shares of Common Stock subject to an Unrestricted Stock Award shall be determined by the Committee. Unrestricted Stock Awards shall not be subject to any Restriction Periods or Performance Measures;provided,however, Unrestricted Stock Awards shall be limited to (i) awards to Non-Employee Directors, (ii) awards to newly hired employees, (iii) awards made in lieu of a cash bonus or (iv) awards granted under thisPlan with respect to the number of shares Common Stock which, in the aggregate, does not exceed five percent (5%) of the total number of shares available for awards under this Plan. Upon the grant of an Unrestricted Stock Award, subject to the Company’s right to require payment of any taxes in accordance withSection 5.5, a certificate or certificates evidencing ownership of the requisite number of shares of Common Stock shall be delivered to the holder of such award or such shares shall be transferred to the holder in book entry form.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |85




Table of Contents

3.3Terms of Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted Stock Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.  

(a)Number of Shares and Other Terms. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Award and the Restriction Period, Performance Period (if any) and Performance Measures (if any) applicable to a Restricted Stock Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(b)Vesting and Forfeiture. The Award Notice relating to a Restricted Stock Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (i) if the holder of such award remains continuously in the employment of the Company during the specified Restriction Period and (ii) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period, and for the forfeiture of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (x) if the holder of such award does not remain continuously in the employment of the Company during the specified Restriction Period or (y) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are not satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period.
(c)Stock Issuance. During the Restriction Period, the shares of Restricted Stock shall be held by a custodian in book entry form with restrictions on such shares duly noted or, alternatively, a certificate or certificates representing a Restricted Stock Award shall be registered in the holder’s name and may bear a legend, in addition to any legend which may be required pursuant toSection 5.7, indicating that the ownership of the shares of Common Stock represented by such certificate is subject to the restrictions, terms and conditions of this Plan and the Award Notice relating to the Restricted Stock Award. All such certificates shall be deposited with the Company, together with stock powers or other instruments of assignment (including a power of attorney), each endorsed in blank with a guarantee of signature if deemed necessary or appropriate, which would permit transfer to the Company of all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock subject to the Restricted Stock Award in the event such award is forfeited in whole or in part. Upon termination of any applicable Restriction Period (and the satisfaction or attainment of applicable Performance Measures), subject to the Company’s right to require payment of any taxes in accordance withSection 5.5, the restrictions shall be removed from the requisite number of any shares of Common Stock that are held in book entry form, and all certificates evidencing ownership of the requisite number of shares of Common Stock shall be delivered to the holder of such award.
(d)Rights with Respect to Restricted Stock Awards. Unless otherwise set forth in the Award Notice relating to a Restricted Stock Award, and subject to the terms and conditions of a Restricted Stock Award, the holder of such award shall have all rights as a stockholder of the Company, including, but not limited to, voting rights, the right to receive dividends and the right to participate in any capital adjustment applicable to all holders of Common Stock;provided,however, that (i) a distribution with respect to shares of Common Stock, other than a regular cash dividend, and (ii) a regular cash dividend with respect to shares of Common Stock that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions, in each case, shall be deposited with the Company and shall be subject to the same restrictions as the shares of Common Stock with respect to which such distribution was made.

3.4Terms of Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.

(a)Number of Shares and Other Terms. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Unit Award and the Restriction Period, Performance Period (if any) and Performance Measures (if any) applicable to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(b)Vesting and Forfeiture. The Award Notice relating to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of such Restricted Stock Unit Award (i) if the holder of such award remains continuously in the employment of the Company during the specified Restriction Period and (ii) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period, and for the forfeiture of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (x) if the holder of such award does not remain continuously in the employment of the Company during the specified Restriction Period or (y) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are not satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period.

86 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

(c)Settlement of Vested Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The Award Notice relating to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall specify (i) whether such award may be settled in shares of Common Stock or cash or a combination thereof and (ii) whether the holder thereof shall be entitled to receive, on a current or deferred basis, dividend equivalents, and, if determined by the Committee, interest on, or the deemed reinvestment of, any deferred dividend equivalents, with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such award. Any dividend equivalents with respect to Restricted Stock Units that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions shall be subject to the same restrictions as such Restricted Stock Units. Prior to the settlement of a Restricted Stock Unit Award, the holder of such award shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to such award.
3.5Termination of Employment or Service. All of the terms relating to the satisfaction of Performance Measures and the termination of the Restriction Period or Performance Period relating to a Stock Award, or any forfeiture and cancellation of such award (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such award, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable Award Notice.

IV. PERFORMANCE AWARDS

4.1Performance Awards. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Performance Awards to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee.

4.2Terms of Performance Awards. Performance Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.

(a)Value of Performance Awards and Performance Measures. The method of determining the value of the Performance Award and the Performance Measures and Performance Period applicable to a Performance Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(b)Vesting and Forfeiture. The Award Notice relating to a Performance Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of such Performance Award if the specified Performance Measures are satisfied or met during the specified Performance Period and for the forfeiture of such award if the specified Performance Measures are not satisfied or met during the specified Performance Period.
(c)Settlement of Vested Performance Awards. The Award Notice relating to a Performance Award shall specify whether such award may be settled in shares of Common Stock (including shares of Restricted Stock) orcash or a combination thereof. If a Performance Award is settled in shares of Restricted Stock, such shares of Restricted Stock shall be issued to the holder in book entry form or a certificate or certificates representing such Restricted Stock shall be issued in accordance withSection 3.3(c) and the holder of such Restricted Stock shall have such rights as a stockholder of the Company as determined pursuant toSection 3.3(d). Any dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to a Performance Award shall be subject to the same restrictions as such Performance Award. Prior to the settlement of a Performance Award in shares of Common Stock, including Restricted Stock, the holder of such award shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company.

4.3Termination of Employment or Service. All of the terms relating to the satisfaction of Performance Measures and the termination of the Performance Period relating to a Performance Award, or any forfeiture and cancellation of such award (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such award, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable Award Notice.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |87




Table of Contents

V. GENERAL

5.1Effective Date and Term of Plan. This Plan was approved by the Board on April 9, 2014, and became effective as of June 11, 2014, the date on which the Company’s stockholders approved the Plan. This Plan superseded and replaced the Prior Plan;provided that the Prior Plan shall remain in effect with respect to all outstanding awards granted under the Prior Plan until such awards have been exercised, forfeited, canceled, expired or otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of such grants. The amendment and restatementemployee benefit plan documents. In general, the plan documents specify that the trustee will vote the shares for which it does not receive instructions in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it received timely instructions, unless it determines that to do so would be contrary to law.

You may revoke previously given voting instructions by following the instructions provided by the trustee.

A:

Under the rules of the Plan,New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), if a broker or other financial institution holds your shares in its name and you do not provide your voting instructions to them, that firm’s discretion to vote your shares for you is very limited. For this Annual Meeting, in the absence of your voting instructions, your broker only has discretion to vote on Proposal 2, the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. It does not have discretion to vote your shares for any of the other proposals expected to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If you do not provide voting instructions and your broker elects to vote your shares on Proposal 2, the missing votes for each of the other proposals are considered “broker non-votes.”

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares promptly.

A:

RegisteredHolders: Registered shareholders can authorize someone other than the individual(s) named on the Proxy Card or Notice to attend the virtual meeting or vote on their behalf by crossing out the individual(s) named on the Proxy Card or Notice and inserting the name, address and email address of the individual being authorized. Request registration of an authorized representative by forwarding an image of your updated Proxy Card or Notice to Computershare either by email to legalproxy@computershare.com or by mail to Computershare,CaterpillarInc.LegalProxy,P.O.Box43001,Providence,RI02940-3001.

StreetHolders: Street name holders can authorize someone other than the individual(s) named on the legal proxy obtained from their broker to attend the virtual meeting or vote on their behalf by providing a written authorization to the individual being authorized along with the legal proxy.

Contact information for the authorized individual, including name, address and email address is required for registration of the authorized representative. Requests for registration of an authorized representative along with the contact information specified above and an image of your legal proxy should be directed to Computershare either by email to legalproxy@computershare.com or by mail to Computershare, Caterpillar Inc. Legal Proxy, P.O. Box 43001, Providence, RI 02940-3001.

Requests for registration of an authorized representative must be labeled as set forth herein, was approved“Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 5, 2020.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    62


Back to Contents

A:

Shareholders may submit questions either before the Annual Meeting (from May 27 to June 3, 2020) or during the Annual Meeting. If you wish to submit a question either before or during the meeting, please log into www.meetingcenter.io/268805716, enter the meeting password and your 15-digit control number, then follow the instructions to submit a question. Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting, subject to time limitations.

A:

Registered Holders: You may change or revoke your proxy by submitting a written notice of revocation to Caterpillar Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary at 510 Lake Cook Road, Suite 100, Deerfield, IL 60015 before the Annual Meeting or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting. For all methods of voting, the last vote cast will supersede all previous votes.

StreetHolders: You may change or revoke your voting instructions by following the specific directions provided to you by your bank or broker.

A:

A quorum of shareholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. Holders of at least one-third of all Caterpillar common stock must be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for establishing a quorum.

A:

In uncontested elections, director nominees are elected by a majority vote of the shares cast, meaning that each director nominee must receive a greater number of shares voted “for” such director than shares voted “against” such director. If an incumbent director does not receive a greater number of shares voted “for” such director than shares voted “against” such director, then such director must tender his or her resignation to the Board on April 12, 2017, and shall become effective asof Directors.

In a contested election, director nominees are elected by a plurality of the datevotes cast, meaning that the Company’s stockholders approvenominees with the amendment and restatementmost affirmative votes are elected to fill the available seats.

All other actions presented for a vote of the Plan. The amended and restated Plan will be deemed to be approved byshareholders at the stockholders if it receives theAnnual Meeting require an affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of stock of the Company present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at a meeting duly held in accordance withon the applicable provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Company. In the event this amendment and restatement of the Plan is not approved by Company’s stockholders, this amendment and restatement shall not take effect and the Plan as insubject matter.

Abstentions will have no effect on April 11, 2017director elections. Abstentions will continue. The Plan shall terminate onhave the tenth anniversary of the Plan’s effective date, June 11, 2024, unless terminated earlier by the Committee;provided that no Incentive Stock Options shall be granted later than ten (10) years after the date the Plan is adopted by the Board or the date the Plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company, whichever is earlier. Termination of this Plan shall not affect the terms or conditions of any award granted prior to termination. Awards hereunder may be made at any time prior to the termination of this Plan.

5.2Amendments. The Committee may amend this Plan as it shall deem advisable;provided,however, that no amendment to the Plan shall be effective without the approval of the Company’s stockholders if (i) stockholder approval is required by applicable law, rule or regulation, including Section 162(m) of the Code and any rule of the New York Stock Exchange, or any other stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, or (ii) such amendment seeks to modifySection 2.4 hereof;providedfurther, that no amendment may materially impair the rightseffect of a holder ofvote against all other proposals. Broker non-votes will not have an outstanding award without the consent of such holder.

5.3Award Notice. Each award under this Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Notice setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to such award. No award shall be valid until an Award Notice is provided by the Company and, to the extent the Committee may, in its sole discretion, require, either executed by the recipient or accepted by the recipient byelectronic means approved by the Committee within the time period specified by the Committee. Upon execution by the Company, or if required, upon such execution and delivery of the Award Notice to the Company or electronic acceptance of the Award Notice, such award shall be effective as of the effective date set forth in the Award Notice.

5.4Non-Transferability.

(a)Except as provided inSection 5.4(b), no award shallbe transferable other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution, pursuant to beneficiary designation procedures approved by the Company, pursuant to a domestic relations order or, to the extent expressly permitted in the Award Notice relating to such award, to the holder’s family members, a trust or entity established by the holder for estate planning purposes or a charitable organization designated by the holder(a “Permitted Transferee”), in each case, without consideration. Except to the extent permitted by the foregoing sentence or the Award Notice relating to an award, each award may be exercised or settled during the holder’s lifetime only by the holder or the holder’s legal representative, agent or similar person. Except as permitted by the second preceding sentence, no award may be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated, encumbered or otherwise disposed of (whether by operation of law or otherwise) or be subject to execution, attachment or similar process. Upon any attempt to so sell, transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate, encumber or otherwise dispose of any award, such award and all rights thereunder shall immediately become null and void.

(b)

Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs (except for any Tandem SAR granted in tandem with an Incentive Stock Option), whether vested or unvested, held by (A) participants who are considered officers of the Company for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act; (B) participants who are Directors; or (C) any participants who previously held the positions in clauses (A) and (B) may be transferred by gift or by domestic relations order to one or more Permitted Transferees. Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs (except for any Tandem SAR granted in tandem with an Incentive Stock Option), whether vested or unvested, held by all other participants and by Permitted Transferees may be transferred by gift or by domestic relations order only to Permitted Transferees and, in the case of transfers other than in connection with a domestic relations order, upon the prior written approval of the Company’s Director of Compensation & Benefits.


88 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

5.5Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the right to require, prior to the issuance or delivery of any shares of Common Stock or the payment of any cash pursuant to an award made hereunder, payment by the holder of such award of any federal, state, local or other taxes which may be required to be withheld or paid in connection with such award. An Award Notice may provide that (i) the Company shall withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered to a holder, having an aggregate Fair Market Value determined as of the date the obligation to withhold or pay taxes arises in connection with an award (the “Tax Date”), or withhold an amount of cash which would otherwise be payable to a holder, in the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation or (ii) the holder may satisfy any such obligation byeffect on any of the following means: (A) a cash payment to the Company; (B) delivery (either actual delivery orproposals presented for your vote.

Votes submitted by attestation procedures established by the Company) to the Company of previously owned whole shares of Common Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the Tax Date, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation; (C) authorizing the Company to withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the Tax Date, or withhold an amount of cash which would otherwise be payable to a holder, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation; (D) in the case of the exercise of an Option, a cash payment by a broker-dealer acceptable to the Company to whom the optionee has submitted an irrevocable notice of exercise or (E) any combination of (A), (B) and (C), in each case to the extent set forth in the Award Notice relating to the award. Shares of Common Stock to be delivered or withheld may not have an aggregate Fair Market Value in excess of the amount determined by applying the minimum statutory withholding rate;provided,however, that if a fraction of a share of Common Stock would be required to satisfy the minimum statutory withholding taxes, then the number of shares of Common Stock to be delivered or withheld may be rounded up to the next nearest whole share of Common Stock.

5.6Section 83(b) Election. No election under Section 83(b)of the Code (to include in gross income in the year of transfer the amounts specified in Code Section 83(b)) or under a similar provision of the laws of a jurisdiction outside the United States may be made, unless expressly permitted by the terms of the Award Notice. In any case in which a participant is permitted to make such an election in connection with an award, the participant shall notify the Company of such election within ten days of filing notice of the election with the Internal Revenue Service or other governmental authority, in addition to any filing and notification required pursuant to regulations issued under Code Section 83(b) or other applicable provision.

5.7Restrictions on Shares. Each award made hereunder shall be subject to the requirement that if at any time the Company determines that the listing, registration or qualification of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award upon any securities exchange or under any law, or the consent or approval of any governmental body, or the taking of any other action is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the delivery of shares thereunder, such shares shall not be delivered unless such listing, registration, qualification, consent, approval or other action shall have been effected or obtained, free of any conditions not acceptable to the Company. The Company may require that certificates evidencing shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to any award made hereunder bear a legend indicating that the sale, transfer or other disposition thereof by the holder is prohibited except in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.

5.8Adjustment. In the event of any equity restructuring (within the meaning of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation) that causes the per share value of shares of Common Stock to change, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering or recapitalization through an extraordinary cash dividend, the number and class of securities available under this Plan, the terms of each outstanding Option and SAR (including the number and class of securities subject to each outstanding Option or SAR and the grant price or base price per share), the terms of each outstanding Restricted Stock Award and Restricted Stock Unit Award (including the number and class of securities subject thereto), the terms of each outstanding Performance Award (including the number and class of securities subject thereto), the maximum number of securities with respect to which Options or SARs may be granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any one grantee, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be awarded during any fiscal year of the Company to any one grantee pursuant to a Stock Award that is subject to Performance Measures or a Performance Award, as set forth inSection 1.6, shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee, such adjustments to be made in the case of outstanding Options and SARs in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. In the event of any other change in corporate capitalization, including a merger, consolidation, reorganization, or partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such equitable adjustments described in the foregoing sentence may be made as determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights of participants. In either case, the decision of the Committee regarding any such adjustment shall be final, binding and conclusive.

2017 Proxy Statement

 |89




Table of Contents

5.9Change in Control.

(a)

Impact of a Change in Control. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event of a Change in Control:

(i)

If and to the extent that outstanding awards under the Plan are (A) continued by the Company, (B) assumed by the successor corporation (or affiliate thereto) or (C) replaced with awards that preserve the existing value of the awards at the time of the Change in Control and provide for subsequent payout in accordance with a vesting schedule and Performance Measures, as applicable, that are the same or more favorable to the participants than the vesting schedule and Performance Measures applicable to the awards, then all such awards or such substitutes therefor shall remain outstanding and be governed by their respective terms and the provisions of the Plan subject toSection 5.9(a)(iv) below.

(ii)

If and to the extent that outstanding awards under the Plan are not continued, assumed or replaced in accordance withSection 5.9(a)(i) above, then upon the Change in Control: (A) outstanding Options and SARs shall immediately vest and become exercisable, (B) the Restriction Period applicable to outstanding Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall immediately lapse; and, with respect to Restricted Stock Unit Awards, shall be payable immediately in accordance with their terms or, if later, as of the earliest permissible date under Code Section 409A, and (C) outstanding Performance Awards granted under the Plan shall immediately vest and shall become immediately payable in accordance with their terms as if the target level of the Performance Measures had been achieved or, with respect to completed performance periods, based on the actual level of achievement.

(iii)

If and to the extent that outstanding awards under the Plan are not continued, assumed or replaced in accordance withSection 5.9(a)(i) above, then the Board may, in its sole discretion, require outstanding awards to be surrendered to the Company by the holder, and to be immediately cancelled by the Company, and to provide for the holder to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to (1) in the case of an Option or an SAR, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock then subject to the portion of such Option or SAR surrendered multiplied by the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of the date of the Change in Control, over the grant price or base price per share of Common Stock subject to such Option or SAR, (2) in the case of a Stock Award or a Performance Award denominated in shares of Common Stock, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock then subject to the portion of such award surrendered to the extent the Performance Measures applicable to such award have been satisfied or are deemed satisfied pursuant toSection 5.9(a)(ii), multiplied by the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of the date of the Change in Control, and (3) in the case of a Performance Award denominated in cash, the value of the Performance Award then subject to the portion of such award surrendered to the extent the Performance Measures applicable to such award have been satisfied or are deemed satisfied pursuant toSection 5.9(a)(ii).

(iv)

If and to the extent that (A) outstanding awards are continued, assumed or replaced in accordance withSection 5.9(a)(i) above and (B) a participant’s employment with, or performance of services for, the Company (or the company resulting from or succeeding to the business of the Company pursuant to such Change in Control) is terminated by the Company for any reason other than Cause or by such participant for Good Reason, in each case, within the 24-month period commencing on the date of the Change in Control, then, as of the date of such participant’s termination: (A) outstanding Options and SARs shall immediately vest and become exercisable, (B) the Restriction Period applicable to outstanding Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall immediately lapse; and, with respect to Restricted Stock Unit Awards, shall be payable immediately in accordance with their terms or, if later, as of the earliest permissible date under Code Section 409A, and (C) outstanding Performance Awards granted under the Plan shall immediately vest and shall become immediately payable in accordance with their terms as if the target level of the Performance Measures had been achieved or, with respect to completed performance periods, based on the actual level of achievement.


90 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

(v)

Outstanding Options or SARs that are assumed or replaced in accordance withSection 5.9(a)(i) may be exercised by the participant in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions of such award as set forth in the applicable Award Notice or elsewhere; provided, however, that Options or SARs that become exercisable in accordance withSection 5.9(a)(iv) may be exercised until the expiration of the original full term of such Option or SAR notwithstanding the other original terms and conditions of such award.

(b)

For purposes of this Plan, unless otherwise provided in an Award Notice, “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any one of the following events:

(i)

During any twenty-four (24) month period, individuals who, as of the beginning of such period, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the beginning of such period whose election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director, without written objection to such nomination) shall be an Incumbent Director;provided,however, that no individual initially elected or nominated as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to directors or as a result of any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall be deemed to be an Incumbent Director;

(ii)

Any “person” (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) is or becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board (the “Company Voting Securities”), unless the Board, as constituted immediately prior to the date on which such person acquires such beneficial interest, by resolution negates the effect of this provision in a particular circumstance, deeming that resolution to be in the best interests of Company stockholders;provided,however, that the event described in this paragraph (ii) shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control by virtue of any of the following acquisitions: (A) by the Company or any Subsidiary; (B) by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary; (C) by any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities; or (D) by any person of Company Voting Securities from the Company, if a majority of the Incumbent Board approves in advance the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of Company Voting Securities by such person;

(iii)

The consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that requires the approval of the Company’s stockholders, whether for such transaction or the issuance of securities in the transaction (a “Business Combination”), that results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto representing (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) less than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such Business Combination; or

(iv)

The stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or the consummation of a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent a payment to be made pursuant to an award upon a Change in Control constitutes deferred compensation that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, and such Change in Control does not constitute a “change in control event,” within the meaning of Treasury regulations promulgated under Section 409A of the Code, such payment shall be paid at the time it is otherwise scheduled to be paid, without regard to the occurrence of the Change in Control.

(c)

For purposes of thisSection 5.9, “Cause” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Notice, a willful engaging in gross misconduct materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company. For this purpose, “willful” means an act or omission in bad


2017 Proxy Statement

 |91




Table of Contents

faith and without a reasonable belief that such act or omission was in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company.

(d)

For purposes of thisSection 5.9, “Good Reason” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Notice, the occurrence of any of the following circumstances (unless such circumstances are fully corrected by the Company before a participant’s termination of employment or the participant fails to provide written notice of such circumstances within 30 days after the participant becomes, or reasonably should have become, aware of such circumstances): (A) the Company’s assignment of any duties materially inconsistent with the participant’s position with the Company, or which result in a material adverse alteration in the nature or status of the responsibilities of the participant’s employment; or (B) a material reduction by the Company in the participant’s annual base salary, unless such reduction is part of a compensation reduction program affecting all similarly situated management employees.

5.10Deferrals. The Committee may determine that the delivery of shares of Common Stock or the payment of cash, or a combination thereof, upon the settlement of all or a portion of any award (other than awards of Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs) made hereunder shall be deferred, or the Committee may, in its sole discretion, approve deferral elections made by holders of awards. Deferrals shall be for such periods and upon such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion, subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

5.11No Right of Participation, Employment or Service. Unless otherwise set forth in an employment agreement, no person shall have any right to participate in this Plan. Neither this Plan nor any award made hereunder shall confer upon any person any right to continued employment by or service with the Company, any Subsidiary or any affiliate of the Company or affect in any manner the right of the Company, any Subsidiary or any affiliate of the Company to terminate the employment or service of any person at any time without liability hereunder.

5.12Rights as Stockholder. No person shall have any right as a stockholder of the Company with respect to any shares of Common Stock or other equity security of the Company which is subject to an award hereunder unless and until such person becomes a stockholder of record with respect to such shares of Common Stock or equity security.

5.13Designation of Beneficiary. To the extent permitted by the Company, a holder of an award may file with the Company a written designation of one or more persons as such holder’s beneficiary or beneficiaries (both primary and contingent) in the event of the holder’s death or incapacity. To the extent an outstanding Option or SAR granted hereunder is exercisable, such beneficiary or beneficiaries shall be entitled to exercise such Option or SAR pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Company. Each beneficiary designation shall become effective only when filed in writing with the Company during the holder’s lifetime on a form prescribed by the Company. The spouse of a married holder domiciled in a community property jurisdiction shall join in any designation of a beneficiary other than such spouse. The filing with the Company of a new beneficiary designation shall cancel all previously filed beneficiary designations. If a holder fails to designate a beneficiary, or if all designated beneficiaries of a holder predecease the holder, then each outstanding award held by such holder, to the extent vested or exercisable, shall be payable to or may be exercised by such holder’s executor, administrator, legal representative or similar person.

5.14Governing Law. This Plan, each award hereunder and the related Award Notice, and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant thereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by the Code or the laws of the United States, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and construed in accordance therewith without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws.

5.15Non-U.S. Employees. Without amending this Plan, the Committee may grant awards to eligible persons who are foreign nationals and/or reside outside the U.S. on such terms and conditions different from those specified in this Plan as may in the judgment of the Committee be necessary or desirable to foster and promote achievement of the purposes of this Plan and, in furtherance of such purposes the Committee may make such modifications, amendments, procedures, subplans and the like as may be necessary or advisable to comply with provisions of laws in other countries or jurisdictions in which the Company or its Subsidiaries operates or has employees.

92 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

5.16Award Forfeitures.

(a)

Forfeiture of Options and Other Awards. Each award granted hereunder shall be subject to the following additional forfeiture conditions, to which the participant, by accepting an award hereunder, agrees. If any of the events specified inSection 5.16(b) occurs (a “Forfeiture Event”), all of the following forfeitures will result:

(i)

The unexercised portion of any Option, whether or not vested, and any other award not then settled (except for an award that has not been settled solely due to an elective deferral pursuant toSection 5.10 by the participant and otherwise is not forfeitable in the event of any termination of service of the participant) will be immediately forfeited and canceled upon the occurrence of the Forfeiture Event; and

(ii)

The participant will be obligated to repay the Company, in cash, within five business days after demand is made thereof by the Company, the total amount of Award Gain (as defined herein) realized by the participant upon each exercise of an Option or settlement of an award (regardless of any elective deferral pursuant toSection 5.10) that occurred on or after (i) the date that is 12 months before the occurrence of the Forfeiture Event, if the Forfeiture Event occurred while the participant was employed by the Company or a Subsidiary, or (ii) the date that is 12 months before the date the participant’s employment by, or service as a Director with the Company or a Subsidiary terminated, if the Forfeiture Event occurred after the participant ceased to be so employed.

(b)

Events Triggering Forfeiture. The forfeitures specified inSection 5.16(a) will be triggered upon the occurrence of any one of the following Forfeiture Events at any time during the participant’s employment by or service as a Director with the Company or a Subsidiary or during the one-year period following termination of such employment or service:

(i)

Non-Solicitation. The participant, for his or her own benefit or for the benefit of any other person, company or entity, directly or indirectly, (i) induces or attempts to induce or hires or otherwise counsels, induces or attempts to induce or hire or otherwise counsel, advise, encourage or solicit any person to leave the employment of or the service for the Company or any Subsidiary, (ii) hires or in any manner employs or retains the services of any individual employed by or providing services to the Company or any Subsidiary as of the date of his or her termination of employment, or employed by or providing services to the Company or any Subsidiary subsequent to such termination, (iii) solicits, pursues, calls upon or takes away, any potential customers of the Company or any Subsidiary, (iv) solicits, pursues, calls upon or takes away, any potential customer of the Company or any Subsidiary that has been the subject of a bid, offer or proposal by the Company or any Subsidiary, or of substantial preparation with a view to making such a bid, proposal or offer, within 12 months before such participant’s termination of employment with the Company or any Subsidiary, or (v) otherwise interferes with the business or accounts of the Company or any Subsidiary.

(ii)

Confidential Information. The participant discloses to any person or entity or makes use of any “confidential or proprietary information” (as defined below in thisSection 5.16(b)(2)) for his or her own purpose or for the benefit of any person or entity, except as may be necessary in the ordinary course of employment with or other service to the Company or any Subsidiary. Such “confidential or proprietary information” of the Company or any Subsidiary, includes, but is not limited to, the design, development, operation, building or manufacturing of products manufactured and supplied by the Company and its Subsidiaries, the identity of the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s customers, the identity of representatives of customers with whom the Company or any Subsidiary has dealt, the kinds of services provided by the Company or any Subsidiary to customers and offered to be performed for potential customers, the manner in which such services are performed or offered to be performed, the service needs of actual or prospective customers, pricing information, information concerning the creation, acquisition or disposition of products and services, customer maintenance listings, computer software and hardware applications and other programs, personnel information, information identifying, relating to or concerning investors in the Company or any Subsidiary, joint venture partners of the Company or any Subsidiary, business partners of the Company or any Subsidiary or other entities providing financing to the Company or any Subsidiary, real estate and leasing opportunities,


2017 Proxy Statement

 |93




Table of Contents

communications and telecommunications operations and processes, zoning and licensing matters, relationships with, or matters involving, landlords and/or property owners, and other trade secrets.

(c)

Plan Does Not Prohibit Competition or Other Participation Activities. Although the conditions set forth in thisSection 5.16 shall be deemed to be incorporated into an award, the Plan does not thereby prohibit the participant from engaging in any activity, including but not limited to competition with the Company and its Subsidiaries. Rather, the non-occurrence of the Forfeiture Events set forth inSection 5.16(b) is a condition to the participant’s right to realize and retain value from his or her compensatory awards, and the consequence under the Plan if the participant engages in an activity giving rise to any such Forfeiture Event are the forfeitures specified herein. This provision shall not preclude the Company and the participant from entering into other written agreements concerning the subject matter ofSections 5.16(a) and5.16(b) and, to the extent any terms of thisSection 5.16 are inconsistent with any express terms of such agreement, thisSection 5.16 shall not be deemed to modify or amend such terms.

(d)

Committee Discretion. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, waive in whole or in part the Company’s right to forfeiture under thisSection 5.16, but no such waiver shall be effective unless evidenced by a writing signed by a duly authorized officer of the Company. In addition, the Committee may impose additional conditions on awards, by inclusion of appropriate provisions in the Award Notice. Nothing contained herein shall require the Committee to enforce the forfeiture provisions of thisSection 5.16. Failure to enforce these provisions against any individual shall not be construed as a waiver of the Company’s right to forfeiture under thisSection 5.16.


5.17Awards Subject to Clawback. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, any participant who is an officer of the Company whose negligence, intentional or gross misconduct contributes to the Company’s having to restate all or a portion of its financial statements, will be required to forfeit awards granted under this Plan and any cash payment or shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to an award, as determined by the Board of Directors, an authorized committee, or its designee, pursuant to the Caterpillar Inc. Guidelines on Corporate Governance Issues, as adopted on December 7, 2013 and any subsequent amendments, including without limitation any such amendments which the Company may be required to adopt under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and implementing rules and regulations thereunder, or as otherwise required by law.

5.18Right of Setoff. The Company or any Subsidiary may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, deduct from and set off against any amounts the Company or Subsidiary may owe to the participant from time to time, including amounts payable in connection with any award, owed as wages, fringe benefits, or other compensation owed to the participant, such amounts as may be owed by the participant to the Company, although the participant shall remain liable for any part of the participant’s payment obligation not satisfied through such deduction and setoff. By accepting any award granted hereunder, the participant agrees to any deduction or setoff under thisSection 5.18.

94 |

2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents




Table of Contents

Please mark your
vote as in this
example

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all of the nominees for Director in
Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 5, and 1 YEAR on Proposal 4

1. 

Election of the following nominees as directors:

Nominees:

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

01. David L. Calhoun

08. Debra L. Reed

02. Daniel M. Dickinson

09. Edward B. Rust, Jr.

03. Juan Gallardo

10. Susan C. Schwab

04. Jesse J. Greene, Jr.

11. Jim Umpleby

05. Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.

12. Miles D. White

06. Dennis A. Muilenburg

13. Rayford Wilkins, Jr.

07. William A. Osborn

2. Ratify the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.   

FOR

   AGAINST
   ABSTAIN
   4. 

Advisory vote on the frequencyof executive compensation votes.

  1 YEAR
 2 YEARS
 3 YEARS
 ABSTAIN
3.Advisory vote to approve executive compensation. 

FOR

 AGAINST
 ABSTAIN
 5.

Approve the Amended and Restated Caterpillar Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

FOR

AGAINST
ABSTAIN

The Board of Directors recommends a vote
AGAINST Proposals 6-11

FORAGAINST

ABSTAIN

6.Shareholder Proposal – Provide a report of lobbying activities.
7.Shareholder Proposal – Decrease percent of ownership required to call special shareholder meeting.
8.Shareholder Proposal – Provide a report of lobbying priorities.
9.Shareholder Proposal – Include sustainability as a performance measure under executive incentive plans.
10.Shareholder Proposal – Amend the Company’s compensation clawback policy.
11. Shareholder Proposal – Adopt a permanent policy that the Chairman be independent.












DATE  2017

SIGNATURE 
SIGNATURE
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. If more than one owner, each must sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.


▲ TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH HERE ▲

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

Please take a moment now to vote your shares of Caterpillar Inc.
common stock for the upcoming Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

YOU CAN VOTE TODAY USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS:

Vote by Internet—Please accesshttps://www.proxyvotenow.com/catand follow the instructions on the screen. Please note you must type an “s” after “http”.

Mobile Device—Scan this QR code to vote with your mobile device.

Vote by Telephone—Pleasecall toll-free at 1-866-257-2283 on a touch-tone telephoneand follow the recorded instructions. Your vote will be confirmed and cast as you direct. (Telephone voting is available for residents of the U.S. and Canada only.)

Vote by Mail—Please complete, sign, date and return the proxy card in the envelope provided to: Caterpillar Inc., c/o Innisfree M&A Incorporated, FDR Station, P.O. Box 5156, New York, NY 10150-5156.

You may vote bymail, telephone, mobile device or Internet 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Your telephone, mobile device or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies in the same manner
as if you had marked, signed and returned a proxy card.



Table of Contents

P R O X Y   A N D   V O T I N G   I N S T R U C T I O N

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS–JUNE 14, 2017

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors

At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Caterpillar Inc. (the “Company” or “Caterpillar”) on June 14, 2017, or at any adjournments thereof, the undersigned (i) hereby appoints, Christopher M. REITZ, Chad J. WIENER and Joni J. FUNK, and each of them, proxies with power of substitution to vote the common stock of the undersigned and/or (ii) with respect to Caterpillar or subsidiary employee benefit plans (“Plan(s)”) for which THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY or CIBC MELLON TRUST COMPANY, each act as directed Trustee (the “Trustee” or “Trustees”) for the Plans’ Trusts, respectively, hereby directs the Trustee(s) to appoint Christopher M. REITZ, Chad J. WIENER and Joni J. FUNK, and each of them, proxies with power of substitution to vote all shares of the Company’s stock credited to the accounts of the undersigned under any Plan(s) held under the Trusts at the close of business on April 17, 2017, as directed hereon on the following matters, and, in their discretion, on any other matters that may come before the meeting. For Plan participants, if the Trustees have not received directions from the undersigned by 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time, on June 12, 2017, the Trustees will vote the shares for which they do not receive instructions (“Undirected Shares”) in the same proportion that they votes shares for which they received timely instructions, unless the Trustee(s) determines that to do so would be contrary to law. Further, under the Plan(s), participants are “named fiduciaries” as defined under ERISA to the extent of their authority to direct the voting of the shares held in their accounts and the proportionate share of Undirected Shares in the Trust(s).

You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes. However, if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations, simply sign and return this card.

This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted by the individuals named on the card (or the individual properly authorized) in the manner you have directed.indicated. If you return a signed proxy with no direction given, itdo not specify how you want your shares voted, they will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations. If you hold shares in more than one account, you must vote each proxy and/or voting instruction card you receive to ensure that all shares you own are voted.

A:

Whenever possible, registered shares and plan shares for multiple accounts with the same registration will be combined into the same proxy card. Shares with different registrations cannot be combined, and as a result, you may receive more than one proxy card. For example, shares held in your individual account will not be combined on the same proxy card as shares held in a joint account with your spouse.

Street shares are not combined with registered or plan shares and may result in your receipt of more than one proxy card. For example, shares held by a broker for your account will not be combined with shares registered directly in your name.

If you hold shares in more than one form, you must vote separately for each notice, proxy and/or voting instruction card or email notification you receive that has a unique control number to ensure that all shares you own are voted.

If you receive more than one proxy card for accounts that you believe could be combined because the registration is the same, contact our transfer agent (for registered shares) or your broker (for street shares) to request that the accounts be combined for future mailings.

A:

The Company and its intermediaries may engage in “householding”, which refers to the process pursuant to which delivery requirements for proxy statements and notices may be satisfied with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address through the delivery of a single proxy statement or a single Internet Notice addressed to those shareholders, unless contrary instructions have been received. If your proxy materials are being householded and you would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement or notice, or if your household is receiving multiple copies of these documents and you wish to request that future deliveries be limited to a single copy, please notify your broker. You can also request prompt delivery of a copy of the proxy materials by contacting the ChiefLegalOfficer,GeneralCounselandCorporateSecretaryat(224)551-4160or510LakeCookRoad,Suite100,Deerfield,Illinois60015.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    63


Back to Contents

A:

Caterpillar pays the cost of soliciting proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors’ recommendations.

▲ TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH HERE ▲

PLEASE VOTE TODAY!

SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR FOUR EASY WAYS TO VOTE.

Important Notice RegardingDirectors. This solicitation is being made by mail and through the AvailabilityInternet, but also may be made by telephone or in person. We have hired Georgeson LLC to assist in the solicitation. We will pay Georgeson LLC a fee of Proxy Materials$15,000 for these services and will reimburse their out-of-pocket expenses. We will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for sending proxy materials to shareholders and obtaining their votes. Proxies may also be solicited on behalf of the Board by directors, officers or employees of Caterpillar by telephone or in person, or by mail or through the Internet. No additional compensation will be paid to such directors, officers or employees for soliciting proxies.

A:

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting of Shareholdersand publish the final results in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

2020 PROXY STATEMENT    64


Back to be held on June 14, 2017: This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the 2016 Form 10-K are available at www.eproxyaccess.com/cat2017.Contents



ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS

Sign upBack to receive next year’s proxy materials via the Internet. To sign up for the optional service, visithttps://www.proxyvotenow.com/cat.Contents


Back to Contents


Back to Contents